- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Tariff Ruling is in: 6-3 against tariffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:19 am to LegendInMyMind
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:19 am to LegendInMyMind
So slightly more than half of 2025 tariffs have to be repaid.
2
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:19 am to BigGreenTiger
quote:
quote:
so basically it’s ok for other countries to rape us tariff wise but we cannot use tariffs to reciprocate and be used as negotiating measures without our useless congress’ direction….is that right?
Yes, that is correct. We have to follow the law.
What law is that actually that says we can be victims of other country tariffs but can't have tariffs ourselves?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:20 am to BigGreenTiger
quote:
I think it was a test to see how far he could push his power.
Me too.
In fact, I think it's obvious.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:20 am to Fun Bunch
Lets see if Johnson has the ballz to get this done through Congress
Yet we know the Rino Rs wont do it
Yet we know the Rino Rs wont do it
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:20 am to BigGreenTiger
So sounds like he can still use the act to implement tariffs, it just has to be strategic and can't be blanket.
Can easily go back and re-do them, but the clusterfrick is refunding already imposed tariffs and what is that process.
Can easily go back and re-do them, but the clusterfrick is refunding already imposed tariffs and what is that process.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Also, what power does the SC have to rule on tariffs?
You serious?
Maga is this dumb.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:21 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Congress, not POTUS
This was ideal when you didn’t have career politicians that are all bought and paid for!
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:21 am to dallastiger55
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:21 am to alive2022
quote:
If only your globalist president had picked different judges
Barrett was a mistake, for sure.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:21 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
RidiculousHype
Don't be a dumb arse.
We are all educated on what is what.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:22 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:22 am to slackster
damn it slack... I told you to stop agreeing with me so much.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:22 am to NC_Tigah
Supreme Court strikes down most of Trump's tariffs in a major blow to the president
nbcnews.com
The justices, divided 6-3, held that Trump's aggressive approach to tariffs on products entering the United States from across the world was not permitted under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The ruling was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, who was joined by three liberal justices and two fellow conservatives, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, in the majority.
"The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration and scope," Roberts wrote. But the Trump administration "points to no statute" in which Congress has previously said that the language in IEEPA could apply to tariffs, he added.
As such, "we hold that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs," Roberts wrote.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito dissented.
It is a rare setback for the administration at the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, since Trump began his second term in January.
The decision does not affect all of Trump's tariffs, leaving in place ones he imposed on steel and aluminum using different laws, for example. But it upends his tariffs in two categories. One is country-by-country or “reciprocal” tariffs, which range from 34% for China to a 10% baseline for the rest of the world. The other is a 25% tariff Trump imposed on some goods from Canada, China and Mexico for what the administration said was their failure to curb the flow of fentanyl.
Trump could seek to reimpose some tariffs, using other laws.
nbcnews.com
The justices, divided 6-3, held that Trump's aggressive approach to tariffs on products entering the United States from across the world was not permitted under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The ruling was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, who was joined by three liberal justices and two fellow conservatives, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, in the majority.
"The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration and scope," Roberts wrote. But the Trump administration "points to no statute" in which Congress has previously said that the language in IEEPA could apply to tariffs, he added.
As such, "we hold that IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs," Roberts wrote.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito dissented.
It is a rare setback for the administration at the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, since Trump began his second term in January.
The decision does not affect all of Trump's tariffs, leaving in place ones he imposed on steel and aluminum using different laws, for example. But it upends his tariffs in two categories. One is country-by-country or “reciprocal” tariffs, which range from 34% for China to a 10% baseline for the rest of the world. The other is a 25% tariff Trump imposed on some goods from Canada, China and Mexico for what the administration said was their failure to curb the flow of fentanyl.
Trump could seek to reimpose some tariffs, using other laws.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:22 am to winkchance
quote:
What law is that actually that says we can be victims of other country tariffs but can't have tariffs ourselves?
The constitution says it pretty clearly... we have to go through the proper steps to put up tariffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:23 am to slackster
The report doesn't appear to address directly whether the tariffs need to be repaid or not, mostly just stating the whole process is going to be a clusterfrick.
Ironically this is going to end up being a boon for the President as the tariffs have been the biggest thing propping up inflation, this should be a net positive for our economy
Ironically this is going to end up being a boon for the President as the tariffs have been the biggest thing propping up inflation, this should be a net positive for our economy
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 9:24 am
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:23 am to Lsut81
quote:
Can easily go back and re-do them, but the clusterfrick is refunding already imposed tariffs and what is that process.
And who do we pay. Many here say foreign companies have born the cost. Dems say consumers have paid for them.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:23 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
You think they give a tiny little squirt of piss for what the Constitution says?
They are populists. They wipe their arse with the Constitution.
Another dumbass "wackatimesthree"
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:23 am to BCreed1
quote:
We are all educated
Clearly some here aren't
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:23 am to slackster
quote:
So slightly more than half of 2025 tariffs have to be repaid.
And then they should require all those companies to repay everyone that purchased items from them where they just passed on the increased tariff cost to the end customer.
Page 4 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News