- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Tariff Ruling is in: 6-3 against tariffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Then why didn't you cocksuckers step up, march you little faggity asses to washington and provide a solution? Because you're full of shite!
There is a post history showing this
4
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:45 am to Indefatigable
quote:
That would be the question, because it only resulted in confusion
No. It cleared the matter up.
quote:
and wasted time.
No again. Tariffs were in place and they will be in place.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:45 am to GRTiger
quote:
Everyone needs politics to be a drama series these days.
I mean the whole thing is being run as if it were a reality tv show so it makes sense that people who didn't use to take part in the process would now view it through that lens
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:45 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Then why didn't you cocksuckers step up, march you little faggity asses to washington and provide a solution? Because you're full of shite!
That post made me laugh.
Not with you, though.
It made me laugh at you.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:46 am to BCreed1
quote:
It cleared the matter up.
Yea. I bet clarifying this legal issue was the goal all along. Because spending a quarter of the term on that endeavor is good strategy that accomplished a lot?
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 9:47 am
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:46 am to loogaroo
quote:
The Dems do this constantly.
Exactly. They are just playing the same game
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:46 am to wackatimesthree
Imagine that you were the owner of a business that closed down directly due to tariffs? Or an employee? This has to sting.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:46 am to scottydoesntknow
I think most people would be fine with tariffs that are fair, well researched and make sense. But what most people don’t like is how Trump would wake up on the wrong side of the bed and just make up tariffs as he went along. None of it made any sense other than just political pressure on countries.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:47 am to RollTide4547
quote:
RollTide4547
Thank you for my morning entertainment. It is like watching a toddler try to do math,.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:47 am to Deuces
quote:
There’s most likely a work around for this.
I never understood how this didn’t have to go through Congress.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:47 am to AGGIES
quote:
quote:
Some people want to believe Trump is stupid and that he is surrounded by stupid people. He isn't.
He is surrounded by Howard Lutnik.
LOL that you think that is the only person. WOW>
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:47 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Then why didn't you cocksuckers step up, march you little faggity asses to washington and provide a solution? Because you're full of shite!
Man, yall are strange. No one cares that much
But pretty much all of us that have some legal background, even those of us like myself that are very right leaning, said it was questionable at best that this act would work.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:47 am to BCreed1
quote:
SHHH!!! You mean Trump "accidentally" preempted them?
It almost sounds like.... nah. Trump is a dumb arse. All of these things that happen is just coincidences.
Lol You're the tard
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:48 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
when the Dems are in control again. And when they are in power, they don't pussyfoot around. They go all in
But not with the IEEPA.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:48 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
The President is only executing laws that were passed by Congress already to levy tariffs.
He chose a law that did not authorize tariffs
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:48 am to wackatimesthree
I understand why people would be in favor of Trump just acting and attempting to expand exec power
People of sick of Congress doing fricking nothing at all, especially when Rs are in place. And Trump just does things. He acts
But what happens when you get the Dem Trump and a Dem Congress...
People of sick of Congress doing fricking nothing at all, especially when Rs are in place. And Trump just does things. He acts
But what happens when you get the Dem Trump and a Dem Congress...
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:48 am to wackatimesthree
quote:I'm not with you either on most things. But JEEZ us there are so many full of shite know-it-alls here that have never accomplished a damn thing in their whole lives...
wackatimesthree
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:48 am to Figgy
quote:
Imagine that you were the owner of a business that closed down directly due to tariffs? Or an employee? This has to sting.
Much like businesses that shut down from COVID regulations, a necessary evil. At least Walmart and Amazon could absorb their customer base though!
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:49 am to BCreed1
quote:
It cleared the matter up.
What needed clearing, exactly?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:49 am to JimEverett
quote:Aye. But the president made several mistakes. First, we aren't at war. There is clear intent that the powers were delegated for wartime. Similarly, "Neeneer neeneer they did it first" retalitory tariffs aren't an emergency. Second, the president didn't tariff selectively. He tried to tariff almost all countries. Too broad. Third, he kept changing the tariffs almost daily at some points. That indicates an exercise of capricous power, not trying to solve an emergecy.
The President's argument is that Congress gave the power to tariff to the Executive under certain conditions. Not that the President has the power to tariff without Congressional approval.
As usual with SCOTUS it's worth reading the opion itself LINK rather than relying on what polical tard influencers say about it.
That said... this part sounds familiar....
quote:
The President asserts the extraordinary power to unilat-
erally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and
scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional
context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear
congressional authorization to exercise it.
IEEPA’s grant of authority to “regulate . . . importation”
falls short. IEEPA contains no reference to tariffs or duties.
The Government points to no statute in which Congress
used the word “regulate” to authorize taxation.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 9:53 am
Page 9 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News