- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Slippery Slope - MN Shooting
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:42 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:42 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
The fundamental issue that Good and her ilk (including posters on this site) don't understand is that their social justice beliefs are not superior to state and local laws.
Rodo
Rodo
0
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:43 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Impeding an officer" means unlawfully hindering or obstructing a law enforcement officer from performing their official duties, which can range from physically resisting arrest (resisting arrest) and disobeying lawful orders (disobeying lawful orders) to creating obstacles or interfering with investigations, often under state or federal statutes like 18 U.S. Code § 111 for federal officers, and carries penalties like fines or imprisonment depending on the severity and use of force.
From quick search, this is what she did for an extended period of time. She put officers in danger along with impeding their actions. Sure, it was somewhat passive however she continued for too long. Also, go park your car sideways in a street and lay on the horn until LEO arrives, see if they just let you drive away
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:44 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
TELL US WHAT crime she was committing.
Interfering/obstructing
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:45 am to SixthAndBarone
why do you troll this board, bot? Are you a TEMU SFP? Go make some additional salient points elsewhere
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 10:47 am
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:47 am to canyon
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:49 am to tigeraddict
Resisting lawful order
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:55 am to Audustxx
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:58 am to CDawson
quote:
if a law enforcement officer gives you a lawful command, like stop, you must comply.
quote:
CDawson
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:00 am to PalletJack
You're right. And to show how far we've gone down the slippery slope consider this...
In the 1950s if an officer tells you do to something you comply. If you don't he draws his gun and points it at your head and repeats the order. You comply. Result? Nobody ever gets shot.
In the 1950s if an officer tells you do to something you comply. If you don't he draws his gun and points it at your head and repeats the order. You comply. Result? Nobody ever gets shot.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:04 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Yes, she was being an arse. Yes, she is a lunatic. Yes, she shouldn't have been doing what she was doing. But BEFORE the shooting, the federal agent ordered her out of the car. Therefore, he must have had the power to arrest/detain her for a crime he's allowed to enforce. What was it?
I was going off of just what the intital video showed (as opposed to statements)..that she was blocking the bike lane and most of a lane of a two lane one way street...to say that the video itself didn't necessarily show a violation of FEDERAL (ICE can't detain for state crimes) law.
Once the video came up of her selectively blocking all of Portland (what a coincidence) Avenue, there was indisputable video evidence of a violation of 18 USC 111. Therefore, the attempted detention was certainly lawful and should be able to defeat any Minnesota attempt to bypass the shooting agent's federal, qualified immunity.
The issue never related to whether or not the agent was guilty of murder. He reasonably feared for his life. I was just curious if he would be able to avoid Minnesota "justice." He might have gotten railroaded like Derek Chauvin.
With the cellphone video from the officer, the total "blocking" video, and the FBI shutting Minnesota out from the investigation, I don't think Minnesota will even attempt to prosecute the ICE agent.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:10 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Did a federal law enforcement agent have the authority to arrest/detain Good for the crime she was committing? BEFORE you argue back, TELL US WHAT crime she was committing. Not what crime you think.
You do realize that law enforcement detains people every single day without charging them with a crime right? If police suspect you of DUI, the first thing they do is detain you for breathalyzer and field sobriety tests. Once you fail the test, then they arrest you. Two people fighting outside or inside a Walmart? They will detain both persons until their investigation of the incident is complete and make arrests based off that investigation.
Removing her from the car does NOT equal arrest. It allows them to detain them and ascertain intentions, threat levels and investigate why two women are parked sideways across a lane of traffic creating a massive disruption.. Feel free to go try what they were doing anywhere. People are going to call cops and cops are going to show up and begin the exact same of interaction.. Being antagonistic and attempting to bait cops is going to result in them detaining you until they figure out exactly what you're up to and your intentions.
There is a huge possibility that they are detained, questioned and released if they had any common sense, but instead they wanted to cosplay as super heroes. Theses "well trained ICE resistors
" did what most dumbasses do in this situation, and that is escalated a situation beyond a simple detainment to a level of a felony, "fleeing" and "assault with a deadly weapon on law enforcement". . A sad example of this is the idiot who murdered a Pelham, AL police officer on the interstate a few years back. He was a pharmacist with zero criminal history. He got stopped for a simple speeding ticket late at night and decided to shoot the officer in the head. Now he's on death row. So when you say what crime were they committing, that's extremely disingenuous. Their behavior prior to law enforcements arrival and during the interaction was sufficient enough to warrant detainment and investigation of their intentions.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:13 am to L5ut1g3r
“Impeding a federal law enforcement officer dumbass!”
Jan 6 ..?
Jan 6 ..?
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:14 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Explain in legal terms.
She was physically obstructing through use of her vehicle hindering and endangering the officers legal authority in that moment. She was also hindering and harassing the officers in their official capacity. The Supreme Court has ruled that you must give them 15 ft of clearance, they did not and thus she was in the process of committing a crime in which she attempted to flee using a deadly weapon.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:17 am to Thecoz
United States Capitol Police (USCP) officers are federal law enforcement officers
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:19 am to SixthAndBarone
You are dumb.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:38 am to SuperSaint
I guess we now know why thugs don't comply. If they do they only get one to suck off, instead of the buffet the want in prison.
Buffet of pricks or die!!
Thanks for clearing that up, bud.
Buffet of pricks or die!!
Thanks for clearing that up, bud.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:39 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
TELL US WHAT crime she was committing
Ok, if you must know:
Section 23 of the Summary Offences Act 1981
Every person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or a fine not exceeding $2,000 for resisting or obstructing any constable or authorized officer acting in the execution of their duty.
Oh, BTW wifey should have been arrested.
The section also includes provisions for inciting or encouraging such actions.
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:45 am to ljhog
Man I am as pro blue as they come and the officer walks if I am on the jury..
but you have mistaken the word execution on that description.. it is for the officer’s job.. not that person doing the violation.
but you have mistaken the word execution on that description.. it is for the officer’s job.. not that person doing the violation.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:48 am to Narax
And just like that SixthandBarrone disappears from the thread
Posted on 1/11/26 at 12:32 pm to GnashRebel
quote:
And just like that SixthandBarrone disappears from the thread
Low information voters need us to google search for them!
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News