- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court Live re Birthright Citizenship and Nationwide Injunctions
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:36 am to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:36 am to IvoryBillMatt
Alito slapping the table?
0
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:38 am to IvoryBillMatt
Exactly. The nationwide injunctions and how they get it wrong a lot.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:38 am to IvoryBillMatt
Sotomayor teeing it up now....
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:39 am to RIPMachoMan
They are not getting rid of birthright citizenship. That would be a level of judicial activism that any serious conservative would be horrified to see.
The solution here is to amend the constitution. If the votes are not there, then they are not there.
The solution here is to amend the constitution. If the votes are not there, then they are not there.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:40 am to StGeorgeTiger
The fact that we have to argue that a District Court in the NW shouldn't be able put an injunction on the whole country is crazy to me.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:41 am to IvoryBillMatt
I’m at work and can’t follow. Are we getting decisions on birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions separately, or are the issues tied into one decision?
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:42 am to LSUFanHouston
This is as much about the nationwide injunction as anything else.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:42 am to IvoryBillMatt
the guy for the injunction is really going into the weeds of where immigration courts handle the issues he speaks of.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:46 am to Rip Torn
quote:
If you thought they were going to end birthright citizenship then you will be disappointed, it’s never going to happen
Good. The President took an oath to preserve the Constitution.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:48 am to BCreed1
quote:
This is as much about the nationwide injunction as anything else.
I do think they might put limits on that. They need to. For a district judge to issue a national injunction should be a massive issue in an emergency with a very short time period.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:50 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
I do think they might put limits on that. They need to. For a district judge to issue a national injunction should be a massive issue in an emergency with a very short time period.
Well, Justice Thomas said as much.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:50 am to LSUFanHouston
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Imagine the USSS taking each and every case and then failing to hear some of them, so the executive is (*no pun) trumped on foreign and domestic policy he or she commands.
It is nuts. They will then have to do this with each President. The USSS will be the President.
Does she not know there are immigration courts she wants to also trump?
This post was edited on 5/15/25 at 10:55 am
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:55 am to High C
quote:
I’m at work and can’t follow. Are we getting decisions on birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions separately, or are the issues tied into one decision?
I think it will only be on nationwide injunctions. I went with the C-Span title which was "Birthright Citizenship," but by half-listening at work, I think the only thing fully briefed is on nationwide injunctions.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:57 am to IvoryBillMatt
Jackson sounds like AOC.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:59 am to IvoryBillMatt
Next up immigration attorney
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:00 am to IvoryBillMatt
I'm not so sure. From seeing Roberts step over Sonia to hearing his remarks about how many times they have to tell district judges I'm optimistic right now - if roberts votes the right way the decision will go the right way
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:00 am to IvoryBillMatt
Dear God.
Just listening to Ketanji Brown Jackson, a member of our highest Judicial System, speak and ask questions for 10 minutes is enough to understand.
Our nation is doomed.
Holy fricksticks that woman is dumb as dirt.
Just listening to Ketanji Brown Jackson, a member of our highest Judicial System, speak and ask questions for 10 minutes is enough to understand.
Our nation is doomed.
Holy fricksticks that woman is dumb as dirt.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:03 am to BCreed1
immigration attorney from some think tank that has full politics of resisting Trump.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:04 am to IvoryBillMatt
Agree - that's what they are deciding - birthright citizenship as a constitutional right is a big enough issue on its own - both of these issues deserve to be fully briefed and argued on their own merits - fyi I am against nationwide injunctions and do not believe "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" confers birthright citizenship to non-citizens
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:05 am to BCreed1
quote:
Next up immigration attorney
I hate to admit it, but I think she is getting the ball over the goal line. District Court nationwide injunctions will remain a thing.
Page 2 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News