Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Thune says he’ll force a vote on the SAVE Act | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Thune says he’ll force a vote on the SAVE Act

Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:24 pm to
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
2718 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

The sentiment is that it's not going to pass until Trump wants it to, and the timing will be for maximum exposure/impact to damage the D Party & their RINO counterparts, and not a moment too soon.


Well you have to get it passed pretty soon if you want it to matter for the midterms. Otherwise they’ll say it’s not enforceable until the next election or some judge will say it’s too close to election time and is voter suppression or some other bullshite
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36444 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

This MUST pass!

It won’t. But yay I guess?

At least there will be political theater.
Posted by LSUDonMCO
Orlando
Member since Dec 2003
8496 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:28 pm to
I'll take "Lying RINO" for $100 Alex!
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36444 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

He needs to change the filibuster rules and pass it.

What would the change be?

Removing it entirely would be the most shortsighted and stupid thing possible.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36444 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

And they better force it through.

They aren’t ditching the filibuster. You know that already.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36444 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Per the Senate Rules and tradition, when holding the floor and speaking, a senator cannot sit, cannot take bathroom breaks, and cannot consume anything except water or, by existing precedent, milk.

The loophole here is that they can yield for questions during their speech. So every Democrat senator can go on indefinitely during each members speech with “questions”.
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
9961 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:47 pm to
Just getting a vote in to act like he's doing something for Murkowski and Turtle to shoot it down. DOA. Uniparty wins
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
22451 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

thought i read where the GOP was looking into bringing back the "talking Filibuster" as a floor rule


I've heard this from several podcasts I watch. The Republicans don't want to do this because they are lazy and entitled.
If they force it, one day they will have tobstand for 24 hours talking....

None of the Senators want to put in the work
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
22451 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 1:08 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:



In the SOTU, @POTUS called on the GOP controlled Senate to pass the SAVE America Act.  

Here is a primer of the Senate rules re how the GOP Senate can pass the SAVE America Act with a simple majority. 51 votes. NOT 60.

1.  @chiproytx and @BasedMikeLee, with support of @SpeakerJohnson put the entire content of the SAVE America Act into a Senate bill (S1383) that had already passed the Senate and was at the HOUSE awaiting consideration. 

2.  The House passed S1383 containing the SAVE America Act language.

3.  S1383 SAVE America Act is now back to the Senate, awaiting Senate action.  It can be called up and moved to floor by simple MAJORITY vote.  Not 60 votes.  Any time.

4.  Once the bill is on the floor, it is ready for consideration. Sen Thune is in charge of it.  

5.  It faces a filibuster.  Thune can then do one of two things:
- try to cut off the filibuster which requires 60 votes and will kill the bill.  

WE DONT WANT HIM TO DO THAT. That is a deliberate move to kill the bill.
  - the other option is to simply allow the Democrats to filibuster the bill.  
THATS WHAT WE WANT

6.  There are 50 GOP Senators pledged to vote yes.  So if we can get to the other side of the filibuster, SAVE America Act can pass with 51 votes.  

7. Make the Democrats actually DO the filibuster.  Make them talk about the bill.

8.   Why do they oppose proof of citizenship for registering to vote?

9.  Why do they oppose photo idea to vote?

10. Why do they oppose requiring states to clean voter rolls?

11.  Let the filibuster run its course.  Let the toddlers have their tantrum 

12.  Then, when that’s over or when they are tired, the SAVE America Act can pass with a simple majority.  51 votes. 

THAT is what we want Sen Thune to do. It is all within his control. 

He just needs to stand up, look the Democrats in the eye and say “okay, guys, let’s go.  Let’s have a filibuster”

That’s what the American people want.  Don’t get sucked into the false narrative that the SAVE America Act must have 60 votes to pass.  Not true. 

What is required is a leader who’s not afraid to lead and a Republican majority who’s not afraid to work.  And to fight for something that matters to the American people.  

We are watching and pushing.  A cloture motion before any debate is intended to kill the bill.  Is that what Sen Thune wants- to be the one who kills the SAVE America Act
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
95046 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Wonder if his constituents have been blowing up his office since SOTU



That's cute that you believe they GAF what we have to say
Posted by SNAP
Member since Nov 2025
242 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

The loophole here is that they can yield for questions during their speech. So every Democrat senator can go on indefinitely during each members speech with “questions”.


The Senator who retains control of the floor must remain standing while the question is being asked.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29567 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 1:43 pm to
Gee, I hope he doesn't pull a hammy or something doing his actual job.

Speaker Johnson is a worthless pile of shite, too, but compared to Thune he looks like the greatest statesman we've ever had.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
164156 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
12901 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

What would the change be? Removing it entirely would be the most shortsighted and stupid thing possible.


No it wouldn’t. The Dems will do it first chance they get.
Posted by Bamafig
Member since Nov 2018
6302 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:02 pm to
What to watch: if any Democrat is “allowed” to vote in the affirmative, the bill is doomed. These would only be show votes for purple districts.

Fetterman may the the sole exception
Posted by Load Toad
Haughton, LA
Member since Aug 2008
2511 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:16 pm to
They need pass the bill with s simple majority. 2 LA senators must vote yea.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10254 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:40 pm to
Ahhhhh ….. the requisite indulgences must have been paid
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
1861 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Is this where they pull the football out from under Charlie Brown again?


Who will be the vote that kills the measure?
Posted by tigerfootball10
Member since Sep 2005
10061 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:44 pm to
Bill Cassidy
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
11535 posts
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:10 pm to
quote:


Getting them on record is fine, but I would rather see it pass. He needs to change the filibuster rules and pass it.


This.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram