Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Tim Walz: Well would you look at that | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Tim Walz: Well would you look at that

Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:41 pm to
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
36814 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:41 pm to
The driver doesn't have to wait for impact to take decisive defensive action.

Yet, from the body cam footage, it sure looks like the vehicle did contact the agent before he opened fire.

I haven't scrolled very far yet, but has Clark already been here to triple down on this being a cold-blooded murder?
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35101 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

It doesn't exactly say that....


Yeah that quote definitely doesn’t read like a statute
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
15244 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

And you're calling someone else a retard?

Are you saying when you read that jpg you expected that to be a word-for-word direct quote from a legal statute? Have you ever read a single law before? You couldn't immediately tell it was abbreviated or paraphrased?
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 9:50 pm
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21065 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:51 pm to
Posted by BigEasy92
Member since Oct 2025
482 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:51 pm to
Police officer or federal agent?
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
35634 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:54 pm to
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 9:54 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35814 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Police officer or federal agent?


The statute says “peace officers”, in which federal law enforcement most certainly is included.

Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21281 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:07 pm to
So in totality, deadly force is authorized when the following occurs:

(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:

(i) can be articulated with specificity;
quote:

There is no ambiguity as to what happened here. It can be clearly articulated..a vehicle accelerating towards an officer would create an immediate life threatening danger which is covered here:


(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and

(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay;

quote:

from the moment the car moves forward toward the officer, it is not unreasonable for him to believe he could suffer bodily injury if he fails to act. In other words if he stands there and does nothing, there is a very real likelihood that he is injured to some degree and at the very worst he is killed. Being that he was previously dragged down the street and seriously injured in a similar situation, it is reasonable to believe he is fully aware of the consequences of a car hitting him, and takes action to protect himself. A 4 thousand pound car impacting a human body can cause serious injury and or death even at a very low speed. You can't simply dismiss this fact away with a "he wasn't hit too hard" explanation... and finally the time frame between her backing up and accelerating forward is mere seconds

This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 10:11 pm
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6303 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:09 pm to
Let's hear the spin from Relentless Analysis and Tx Tiger on this one.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
94930 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:26 pm to
Poor progs. Always finding themselves in a tough spot.

I’m glad these threads have exposed many on this board.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
18948 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:41 pm to
And swallow.
Posted by Da #1 Stunna
985
Member since Oct 2012
2002 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:00 pm to
This is what we call a "SELF OWN"

In soccer / hockey terms, this is an "OWN GOAL"


.....hate to see it. LOL
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
46142 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

That federal agent is about to be a very rich man.

Mayor and Gov slandered the frick out him.


What about the bartender, the hoodrat and the Senators that all jumped on TV, multiple times, to call him a murderer?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156688 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:35 pm to
bo puke didn’t chime in here?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
48179 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:40 pm to
I'm surprised that loony Timmy signed that bill. The bill makes too much sense
Posted by rileytiger
Surfing The Gulf of America
Member since Feb 2007
4290 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:51 pm to
Doesn’t matter. The walls are closing in on him. This is his last stand and you can tell he is desperate for anything. It’s kind of fun to watch.

You also see how Trump has given JD full reign to dunk on this retard?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
142646 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:56 pm to
You’re are going to need more than just video evidence and the actual law on your side.

Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
1831 posts
Posted on 1/10/26 at 1:01 am to
If the stupid bitch intended to only leave the scene she would have slowly moved, until clear of the officer. But that is not what she did.
Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
1245 posts
Posted on 1/10/26 at 1:59 am to
No one cares to convince you, tardbot.
Posted by Kikicaca
1 Mile from the Atchafalaya
Member since Nov 2016
2177 posts
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:05 am to
quote:

To all the lefties on this board who have spent days arguing otherwise,

suck a giant, throbbing cock. gargle the balls too you insufferable bastards   


Already the morning routine for libtards.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram