- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tim Walz: Well would you look at that
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:41 pm to FLTech
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:41 pm to FLTech
The driver doesn't have to wait for impact to take decisive defensive action.
Yet, from the body cam footage, it sure looks like the vehicle did contact the agent before he opened fire.
I haven't scrolled very far yet, but has Clark already been here to triple down on this being a cold-blooded murder?
Yet, from the body cam footage, it sure looks like the vehicle did contact the agent before he opened fire.
I haven't scrolled very far yet, but has Clark already been here to triple down on this being a cold-blooded murder?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:43 pm to xGeauxLSUx
quote:
It doesn't exactly say that....
Yeah that quote definitely doesn’t read like a statute
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:49 pm to xGeauxLSUx
quote:
And you're calling someone else a retard?
Are you saying when you read that jpg you expected that to be a word-for-word direct quote from a legal statute? Have you ever read a single law before? You couldn't immediately tell it was abbreviated or paraphrased?
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:51 pm to FLTech
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:51 pm to FLTech
Police officer or federal agent?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:54 pm to FLTech

This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:58 pm to BigEasy92
quote:
Police officer or federal agent?
The statute says “peace officers”, in which federal law enforcement most certainly is included.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:07 pm to LegendInMyMind
So in totality, deadly force is authorized when the following occurs:
(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:
(i) can be articulated with specificity;
(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and
(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay;
(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:
(i) can be articulated with specificity;
quote:
There is no ambiguity as to what happened here. It can be clearly articulated..a vehicle accelerating towards an officer would create an immediate life threatening danger which is covered here:
(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and
(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay;
quote:
from the moment the car moves forward toward the officer, it is not unreasonable for him to believe he could suffer bodily injury if he fails to act. In other words if he stands there and does nothing, there is a very real likelihood that he is injured to some degree and at the very worst he is killed. Being that he was previously dragged down the street and seriously injured in a similar situation, it is reasonable to believe he is fully aware of the consequences of a car hitting him, and takes action to protect himself. A 4 thousand pound car impacting a human body can cause serious injury and or death even at a very low speed. You can't simply dismiss this fact away with a "he wasn't hit too hard" explanation... and finally the time frame between her backing up and accelerating forward is mere seconds
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:09 pm to FLTech
Let's hear the spin from Relentless Analysis and Tx Tiger on this one.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:26 pm to tigerfan 64
Poor progs. Always finding themselves in a tough spot.
I’m glad these threads have exposed many on this board.
I’m glad these threads have exposed many on this board.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:00 pm to Houag80
This is what we call a "SELF OWN"
In soccer / hockey terms, this is an "OWN GOAL"
.....hate to see it. LOL
In soccer / hockey terms, this is an "OWN GOAL"
.....hate to see it. LOL
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:31 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
That federal agent is about to be a very rich man.
Mayor and Gov slandered the frick out him.
What about the bartender, the hoodrat and the Senators that all jumped on TV, multiple times, to call him a murderer?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:35 pm to Hangit
bo puke didn’t chime in here?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:40 pm to coolpapaboze
I'm surprised that loony Timmy signed that bill. The bill makes too much sense
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:51 pm to FLTech
Doesn’t matter. The walls are closing in on him. This is his last stand and you can tell he is desperate for anything. It’s kind of fun to watch.
You also see how Trump has given JD full reign to dunk on this retard?
You also see how Trump has given JD full reign to dunk on this retard?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 11:56 pm to FLTech
You’re are going to need more than just video evidence and the actual law on your side.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 1:01 am to Blizzard of Chizz
If the stupid bitch intended to only leave the scene she would have slowly moved, until clear of the officer. But that is not what she did.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 1:59 am to LegendInMyMind
No one cares to convince you, tardbot.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:05 am to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
To all the lefties on this board who have spent days arguing otherwise,
suck a giant, throbbing cock. gargle the balls too you insufferable bastards
Already the morning routine for libtards.
Popular
Back to top



0







