- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Moves to Overturn Manhattan Conviction, Citing Immunity Decision
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:22 pm to HailToTheChiz
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:22 pm to HailToTheChiz
Yeah that never happened 
0
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:24 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
You’re saying he paid her off in benefit of his company, not political reputation?
I'm saying that was his defense at trial, to justify why corporate funds were used.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:24 pm to Riverside
Again, no refutation of my post.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
Except for the trial testimony that utterly refutes your misinformation.
Here’s the jury instructions;
Here’s the jury instructions;
quote:
Justice Merchan: The first of the People's theories of unlawful means is Federal elections law, including as to the office of the President of the US.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:30 pm to Riverside
quote:
Except for the trial testimony that utterly refutes your misinformation.
It does not
Please tell me how many jurors voted to convict based off of federal election issues.
quote:
Here’s the jury instructions;
Several potential crimes were listed.
This post was edited on 7/1/24 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
The retrial gonna be fun!
Assuming that idiot actually tries again.
Assuming that idiot actually tries again.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:38 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I'm saying paying off a hooker with hush money to protect your reputation isn't an official act as President.
What was the crime?
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:38 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:none of it as bad as raping your daughter in the shower. See how that’s done?
Ordering the prideboys to hang Mike Pence because he believed it was necessary to enforce election security, sure. Paying off a hooked to protect his reputation doesn't smell quite the same.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:39 pm to TigerFanatic99
This post was edited on 7/1/24 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:40 pm to Timeoday
They collect evidence from his Presidency, so….. not going to hold up…
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:41 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
none of it as bad as raping your daughter in the shower.
Just so we're all clear. That's not an official act either
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:41 pm to stout
Ow would th unity argument apply to actions taken before he was in office?
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Correct it would be in state court!
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Biden can’t stand trial he doesn’t remember anything about anything, lol
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Show us where "hush money" is illegal. Also explain the congress hush money fund while your at it.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:48 pm to stout
“Testimony or private Records of the President or his advisors probing such conduct may not be admitted as evidence at trial”. Page 7
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:51 pm to stout
quote:He was (farcically) convicted of falsifying business records. That's not a presidential act.
immunity from prosecution for official actions he took as president,
The SCOTUS decision won't even apply here with a massive ssstttttreeeeechhhhhh. Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:53 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:It's not. Nor is it a crime. Hell, that wasn't even what he was charged with. Because... it's not a crime.
I'm saying paying off a hooker with hush money to protect your reputation isn't an official act as President.
This post was edited on 7/1/24 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:54 pm to Taxing Authority
Meh depends on what is admissable assuming Fat Albert decides to go for a retrial. His shite is going to get over turned.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 8:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I can't wait to read the briefs discussing how corporate payments for a "hush money" settlement were official acts of the President of the US. I think the payments were made post-election, but pre-inauguration, too.
Long shot, but….
Some of the testimony appears to have relied on information involved in what would/could be official acts. Would that not taint the verdict and call for a retrial?
Didn’t Roberts specifically point out that information received from official acts could not be used in trials regarding unofficial acts?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News