- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE: Ghislaine Maxwell Not in Prison?
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:08 pm to lsuguy84
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:08 pm to lsuguy84
You don't kill people who you have granted immunity to. And none of that even matters. Because the lady they tried to say was in prison was NOT Maxwell. And the two people on the street in Ontario are BOTH dead ringer matches for Maxwell and her brother. The specifics of it all are irrelevant. She isn't in jail.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:19 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:51 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
don’t care about this women - what she did in the 90s doesn’t affect my life in any way
The victims would probably disagree
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:00 pm to AlterEd
Trust no one. Mulder was right all along.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:08 pm to Powerman
quote:
She knows he was murdered
If true, she’s a “loose end”. Why wouldn’t she also be murdered?
She knew what Jeff was doing. She could still talk at any time.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:08 pm to JawjaTigah
People can shite on this stuff all they want, but we can use AI to analyze these things now. AI says the woman in jail is not Ghislaine, but the woman in Ontario is. So I guess they can just frickin deal with it.


Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:10 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
If true, she’s a “loose end”. Why wouldn’t she also be murdered?
He wasn't frickin murdered. He was extracted too.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:17 pm to BarnHater
quote:
Just go back to your CNN, Reddit
I’ve never had a Reddit account and I’m not sure if I’ve even been on the website
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:17 pm to TDTOM
I am calm. I just use the word frick a lot.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:19 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I am calm. I just use the word frick a lot.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 5:37 pm to AlterEd
Lmao.... not saying its not possible, but definot probable.
Why would "they" allow her to roam free and have the capability to expose "them"???
That makes absolutely zero sense. If "they" had the power and influence to allowe her to walk free, "they" would have the power to simply eliminate her and any possible threat.
Why would "they" allow her to roam free and have the capability to expose "them"???
That makes absolutely zero sense. If "they" had the power and influence to allowe her to walk free, "they" would have the power to simply eliminate her and any possible threat.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 5:43 pm to AlterEd
The prisoner they are trying to sell us on is not Maxwell. Other than that, I can't make any assertions. I can see though that simple fact.
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 2/21/26 at 5:48 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I am calm. I just use the word frick a lot.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 5:54 pm to AlterEd
quote:
People can shite on this stuff all they want, but we can use AI to analyze these things now. AI says the woman in jail is not Ghislaine, but the woman in Ontario is. So I guess they can just frickin deal with it.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Grok’s response from that thread is
quote:
Based on visual analysis and recent reports from BBC, ABC, NPR, and others confirming Ghislaine Maxwell's prison deposition in February 2026, these appear to be the same person. Differences in appearance (e.g., glasses, no makeup, lighting) are consistent with aging and prison conditions. No evidence from diverse sources supports a body double.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:04 pm to Willie Stroker
Note how it says based on reports of other people saying she is in prison and shite like that. When you ask it to disregard all of that and do a strict side by side you get a completely different answer that looks more like this.
The analysis in your example is obviously flawed as it is not doing a strict side by side comparison. Should be obvious.
The analysis in your example is obviously flawed as it is not doing a strict side by side comparison. Should be obvious.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:04 pm to AlterEd
It's fake. This is the original. Does she look like Maxwell?

Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:07 pm to Willie Stroker
That AI doesn’t count. You have to use QAI. It helps them feel better about the bullshite they believe.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:07 pm to moontigr
No, it is not fake. Again.


Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:08 pm to Breaux
quote:
That AI doesn’t count. You have to use QAI. It helps them feel better about the bullshite they believe.
Try again. You can use the same AI and ask it to remove its biases and do a strict side by side and it tells you they are quite obviously different people.
Everything you post is fricking stupid.
Popular
Back to top


2




