Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Update: War in Iran thread | Page 58 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Update: War in Iran thread

Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:47 am to
Posted by AndrewAnglin
Member since Dec 2025
15 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:47 am to
The Shah hasn’t been in Iran in almost fifty years. It is very unlikely the Iranians would accept his rule. I’m sure the Iranian diaspora would tell you otherwise but that’s to be expected.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24427 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:52 am to
Wrong.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
28918 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:55 am to
RQ 180s are mostly used for EW but they do carry weapons. I would have to assume a massive build up there of them is to either bring Irans internet back on or jam the Chinese trash blocking starlink. Trump is going to want this on video and he likely doesn’t want innocent people bombed
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
57539 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Eli David is the director of Mossad. He definitely knows something

quote:

US CENTCOM announced

quote:

As of January 14, 2026, the **current leader (Director) of Mossad** is **David Barnea** (also known as Dadi Barnea). He has held the position since June 1, 2021, succeeding Yossi Cohen, and his standard five-year term is set to end in June 2026.

Recent reports from December 2025 indicate that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu nominated **Maj. Gen. Roman Gofman** (his military secretary) as the next Mossad director to replace Barnea upon the completion of Barnea's term in June 2026. This appointment has been widely covered and appears to have been approved or advanced (including congratulations from the IDF Chief of Staff), but Gofman has not yet assumed the role.

Sources like The Times of Israel, Haaretz, and others consistently describe Barnea as the incumbent director, with Gofman positioned as the designated successor starting mid-2026. No indications of an early transition, extension of Barnea's term, or change in leadership have appeared in the most recent available information. Mossad directorship appointments are made by the Prime Minister and typically last five years (extendable by one year).
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:07 pm
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
73482 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

It is very unlikely the Iranians would accept his rule. I’m sure the Iranian diaspora would tell you otherwise but that’s to be expected.

I don't think it is a given that he would be a stable option longterm. There is a sizable portion of the Iranian populace that is against any monarchist rule. It would probably suffice and be accepted in the short term, however, simply due to the desire for change.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:18 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149802 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:08 pm to
Hes talking a big game now about being more of a stabilizer that would look to implement democratic processes that would allow the Iranians to choose their own type of governance

But the sincerity of that who the hell knows
Posted by VolInBavaria
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Dec 2015
4628 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

The Shah hasn’t been in Iran in almost fifty years. It is very unlikely the Iranians would accept his rule. I’m sure the Iranian diaspora would tell you otherwise but that’s to be expected.


You obviously haven’t watched a single video that’s came out of Iran in the last 2 weeks. They all want him back
Posted by Boomdaddy65201
BoCoMo
Member since Mar 2020
4379 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

IRAN SENDING FAKE PROTESTERS TO SET PEOPLE UP AND KILL THEM


So Pelosi and Wray are calling the shots in Tehran as well?

Let it be known, at least the Mullahs buy nothing but the best.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
28918 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:08 pm to
Israel is prepping to close their airspace if needed citing pre attacks



They fricked
Posted by VolInBavaria
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Dec 2015
4628 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:09 pm to
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
28918 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:12 pm to
We are going to rain down hell there sometime in the next 24 hours. I am guessing tomahawks for IRGC facilities and other larger targets and more precision aircraft to take down the regimes leaders.

Trump is iceman
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:16 pm
Posted by VolInBavaria
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Dec 2015
4628 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

We are going to rain down hell there sometime in the next 24 hours. I am guessing tomahawks for IRQC facilities and other larger targets and more precision aircraft to take down the regimes leaders. Trump is iceman


I’m skeptical of us taking out high level people in the regime. Hope I’m wrong though
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
5766 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:15 pm to
This is why muslim leaders in iran need to worry.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149802 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:15 pm to
Plus dont you really need boots on the ground when it comes to that stuff?
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
57539 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:16 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

REPORTS SAY A U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER JUST ENTERED THE RED SEA... BUT IT DIDN’T

Turns out, the USS Roosevelt aircraft carrier did not show up in the Red Sea at all.

CENTCOM's announcement about a Roosevelt in the Red Sea was about something else: a destroyer with the same name, not the massive carrier.

The real USS Roosevelt carrier is still sitting in San Diego.

Source: CENTCOM, USNI News
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
28918 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:17 pm to
We have aircraft that have the precision capability to take them down. We would almost certainly want men on the ground for confirmation though, especially if we actually target the ayatollah
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
73482 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

CENTCOM's announcement about a Roosevelt in the Red Sea was about something else: a destroyer with the same name, not the massive carrier.

This isn't the first we've seen this specific confusion with the Roosevelts.
Posted by VolInBavaria
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Dec 2015
4628 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5722 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

You obviously haven’t watched a single video that’s came out of Iran in the last 2 weeks. They all want him back


The most popular guy on the team is the backup QB. Hatred of the leader can produce love for any other option.

The fall of Iran’s government will be one hell of a dragon to try and ride. Absent major US involvement I’d be hard pressed to see a friendly, stable and liberal government emerging. Their neighborhood is rough.
Posted by VolInBavaria
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Dec 2015
4628 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:23 pm to
Jump to page
Page First 56 57 58 59 60 ... 216
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 58 of 216Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram