- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What's at stake if we don't crush the marxist insurrection in MSP
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:02 am to hansenthered1
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:02 am to hansenthered1
Don't believe the hype, there are always more options than black or white.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
This doesn't even qualify as a deflection. This is pure, unadulterated avoidance.
What is the "moderate" approach?
Do I need to explain to you what "false choice" means? I hope not.
Strike 2
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:35 am to Average_Comments
quote:
Don't believe the hype, there are always more options than black or white.
There's no such thing as "a little pregnant."
With some issues, there is no middle ground.
You either have borders, or you do not.
You either have immigration laws, or you do not.
The "middle ground" is non-enforcement to some degree. Period.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it. No framing needed. All you need to do is admit there is ONE other possible, reasonable policy view other than those 2 to prove my comment correct. You don't think those are the only 2 options, do you?
My fear is we passed that point 40 years ago or so, pre-internet anyway. The country needed to bend the arc of history before the current system got so entrenched.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's not a rational POV.
Then share one. You don't even have to "sell" it.
Just share a single, simple alternative (or rational, as you use).
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:52 am to Cotten
He doesn’t have alternatives or solutions. His only purpose is simply to argue
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well that's difficult. The rational option was to avoid an overly aggressive policy with ICE that increased the risk of an incident like what we saw in MN from happening.
I am now sincerely curious: Did you ever post something similar when the feds raided the Trump home at Mar a Lago? That the policy was overly aggressive????
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:46 am to udtiger
The problem is whose interpretation of the laws are we following? The answer of course is Trumps, for now....
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again, you don't get to do this meme while promoting emotional thinking over rationality like you did with your first post.
Don’t play dumb like this:
We know what the left wants.
We know how delusional they are.
We know how far they will go.
We know the mess they made is large.
We knew the clean up would not be easy.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:23 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
The last election proved that the media has no power anymore. .
Kamala’s vote % proves otherwise imo
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well that's difficult. The rational option was to avoid an overly aggressive policy with ICE that increased the risk of an incident like what we saw in MN from happening.
This is a lawyerspeak, bullshite, cop out. Provide a clear tangible example of rationality that BOTH sides would adhere to.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 1:38 pm to hansenthered1
Personally, I believe the mess should be left for the state of Minnesota to clean up. However, we all know this is STAGED. I think TRUMP should protect the Federal agency officers to the Nth degree. Treat the Federal offices like a U.S. embassy. If the protestors "cross the line" go scorched earth on them. As far as the B.S. on the street we should let them burn the M-F city down. 
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:30 pm to VOR
When Rome went to war it understood over 1000 years ago you could not keep the normal political environment intact and win a war. Too bad modern cucks can't seem to think as clearly as those who ran the Roman Republic. We are in a civil war. We don't win by being nice and acting like it's 1995
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:55 pm to hansenthered1
quote:
We are in a civil war. We don't win by being nice and acting like it's 1995
The reality of the situation.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 6:39 pm to Cuz413
quote:
This is a lawyerspeak, bullshite, cop out. Provide a clear tangible example of rationality that BOTH sides would adhere to.
Exactly and he will not do it. You might be the 4th person to ask him to do this.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 6:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No framing needed. All you need to do is admit there is ONE other possible, reasonable policy view other than those 2 to prove my comment correct. You don't think those are the only 2 options, do you?
This is a conjured narrative by the socialists/marxists to attempt to regain power.
They lost power because they let millions of illegals in. Now they are pivoting to saying it’s wrong to deport them and spreading propaganda to try and win back power.
They want power and they want open borders to get more votes.
Simple as that.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 6:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they will seize it
What is it they will seize?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:12 pm to hansenthered1
1,000 Kent States is acceptable.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:16 pm to hansenthered1
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:32 pm to Average_Comments
quote:
The problem is whose interpretation of the laws are we following? The answer of course is Trumps, for now....
Better use the laws to our advantage because we know they will.
Back to top


1









