- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When Law Enforcement Intentionally Creates Justification For Shooting
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:32 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:32 pm to djsdawg
Just like department policy not allowing high speed pursuit, some agencies have policy about standing in front of vehicles and firing into the vehicle. What was the department policy og ICE? An officer standing in front of a vehicle is not wise.
2
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:39 pm to texas tortilla
quote:
An officer standing in front of a vehicle is not wise.
It’s not but it is irrelevant when discussing whether this were murder or self defense.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:42 pm to SpecialK_88
quote:
An officer can draw a weapon to protect himself when there's no other option. They are held to an even higher standard than normal citizens. He also didn't actually shoot the gun until he was no longer in front of the car. Case is closed right there, what the car was doing no longer matters as it's no longer self defense.
Not sure what video you watched. But, you Liberals don’t let reality get in the way of good propaganda…
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:43 pm to djsdawg
quote:
As soon as she hit the accelerator, and then hit him, the cop was allowed to defend himself until the threat was neutralized.
The threat was neutralized as soon as he was no longer in front of the car, which was before the first shot.
The guy is screwed, which is why the feds are trying like hell not to let him get prosecuted.
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:44 pm to SpecialK_88
Lol no his shot went through the he windshield.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:46 pm to Jbird
quote:
Lol no his shot went through the he windshield.
Yes, the very edge of the windshield, where the bullet would have to be traveling diagonally to hit someone behind a steering wheel.
Now class, if a bullet enters the very edge of the windshield, and travels diagonally to hit someone behind the steering wheel, where is the shooter? If you said to the side of the car then you have a basic level of spatial awareness.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:47 pm to SpecialK_88
quote:
SpecialK_88
Well, the "Special" in your username is certainly accurate.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:48 pm to SpecialK_88
quote:
The threat was neutralized as soon as he was no longer in front of the car, which was before the first shot.
The threat wasn’t neutralized until she was dead or detained. She was still in possession of the weapon she used to threaten a LEO.
quote:
The guy is screwed,
Only if one can prove she did not do what she did, and there is zero chance that can be proven thank to video evidence.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:49 pm to AlterEd
Nah, 2nd amendment
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:53 pm to SpecialK_88
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:58 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
the practice of placing oneself in front of a vehicle
What does the internal investigation say about the practice of a driver reversing a vehicle, turning the wheel as the vehicle moves backwards which changes the direction the front of the vehicle is facing, and putting a person who was standing to the side of the vehicle suddenly right in front of the front bumper just before the driver hits the accelerator and spins the tires? Because that's actually what happened. Essentially, she moved her SUV so it was aimed at the agent who had been standing off to the side. Then she ran into him.
Does the internal investigation say if that creates a justification for shooting?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:10 pm to SpecialK_88
“The threat was neutralized as soon as he was no longer in front of the car, which was before the first shot.
The guy is screwed, which is why the feds are trying like hell not to let him get prosecuted”
Wow these are the 2 dumbest things I’ve seen written on this subject since it began
And considering prior to this the dumbest thing I’d seen was the original post of this thread that’s pretty impressive.
Would you care to describe exactly how “the guy is screwed” so we can refer back to it and mock you even more than you re being now when this is ruled a legit shoot……….because the threat was not “neutralized” until he plugged all 4 shots into the dumb bitch who turned her car such that he was in front of it and accelerated toward him.
Who exactly is going to “screw” him. Feds? MN? The dumb bitches wildebeest lover in a civil? Who?
The guy is screwed, which is why the feds are trying like hell not to let him get prosecuted”
Wow these are the 2 dumbest things I’ve seen written on this subject since it began
And considering prior to this the dumbest thing I’d seen was the original post of this thread that’s pretty impressive.
Would you care to describe exactly how “the guy is screwed” so we can refer back to it and mock you even more than you re being now when this is ruled a legit shoot……….because the threat was not “neutralized” until he plugged all 4 shots into the dumb bitch who turned her car such that he was in front of it and accelerated toward him.
Who exactly is going to “screw” him. Feds? MN? The dumb bitches wildebeest lover in a civil? Who?
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:19 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:19 pm to TX Tiger
Even if this were true, it still the effect and not the cause. The cause is she was there, she was obstructing, she refused to exit the vehicle. But don't dare address any of that. Keep trying to blame leo for doing their jobs
You are pathetic. These paid agitators are running around all over the city causing havoc and harrassing innocent people for the way they look and even showing up to leo private residences. Absolutely unacceptable
You are pathetic. These paid agitators are running around all over the city causing havoc and harrassing innocent people for the way they look and even showing up to leo private residences. Absolutely unacceptable
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:21 pm to TX Tiger
That was idiotic
Walking around the front of the vehicle is not an invitation to be run over
Maybe he was just asking for it, with what he wore. . .
Walking around the front of the vehicle is not an invitation to be run over
Maybe he was just asking for it, with what he wore. . .
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:22 pm to SpecialK_88
quote:AFTER he had already been hit by the car genius
The threat was neutralized as soon as he was no longer in front of the car
quote:Factually incorrect
which was before the first shot
Besides, none of your bullcrap answer matters. "OR OTHERS." See if you can figure out what that means.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:22 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Ross was a member of that group during the time of that "practice."
patriot!
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:25 pm to SpecialK_88
quote:one of them
the very edge of the windshield
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:40 pm to SpecialK_88
quote:
They are held to an even higher standard than normal citizens.
No. They’re not.
If I was standing there and she tried to run over me, I could shoot her. Just like the cop did.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:41 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
This review included all CBP use of deadly force events from January 2010 through October 2012
The above quote is on page 2 of the document.
Are you surprised the slow talking, mis-thinking YouTuber didn’t claim agents were being trained by the Obama Administration to jump in front of vehicles so they could kill drivers?
The “training” was under Obama 13-16 years ago.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News