Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Who pays the tariffs? | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Who pays the tariffs?

Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
918 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Whereas with top level tax brackets being over 90% this country grew and thrived at unprecedented and since unmatched levels. Curious.
What is the point you are trying to make? Legitimately curious.
Posted by frogtown
Member since Aug 2017
5957 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I really wish people would be as disgusted with the income tax as much as they are with with tariffs.


I am disgusted with all of it. What equally disgusts me is there are many in the GOP who cannot even admit tariffs are a tax.
Posted by Harry Caray
Denial
Member since Aug 2009
21045 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

What is the point you are trying to make? Legitimately curious.

That income taxes are more effective/go further for the country's interest when the ultra wealthy have to pay more from the top bracket.
Posted by frogtown
Member since Aug 2017
5957 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

So how does that compare to the 2020s?


Read it.

link
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
918 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

when the ultra wealthy have to pay more from the top bracket
I’d prefer a consumption tax. Then no one, including the ultra wealthy, could avoid paying their ‘fair’ share.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83655 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:58 pm to
The consumer always pays for tariffs

Always.

That has never NOT been the case.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58986 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

So how does that compare to the 2020s?


17% effective federal tax when top bracket was 91%.

25.9% effective federal tax rate in 2024.

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58986 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

The consumer always pays for tariffs Always. That has never NOT been the case.


Estimates between 4-18 percent are out there on exporters eating the cost of the tariffs.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83655 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:04 pm to
Eating the cost. .

Would love to see that "paid for" study.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12110 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Taxing Authority

Informative, data driven post with links to research. We need more of that around here
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
27974 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Eating the cost.


Only for tariffs, apparently. Post a topic about raising the wage of a fast food worker and they immediately grasp the consequences.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
31080 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

It's a long-game, for sure.

The blame is on who outsourced all our labor and forced us to do so much importing of goods.

Those who sold us out many decades ago are to blame.
Factually this occurred when nat'l unions became too powerful and took over control of our manufacturing, and transportation industries, along with many other national, state and local entities in the country.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

25.9% effective federal tax rate in 2024.


Holy crap. Really?

The IRS is getting really good at collecting taxes.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5590 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:17 pm to
Canadian site that sells direct to US adds 30% at checkout to US orders and eats 10%.....

U.S. Customers . . . . Please note that there is now a 35% tariff on Canadian goods. With brokerage fees, this adds about 39-40% to the price -- payable before entering the U.S.... We try to help by charging only 30%, and paying the remaining 9-10% ourselves... Also, there is no sales tax on orders shipped from Canada... This exemption can further reduce your extra cost to 20% -- depending on your location. It is unknown if this tariff will be reduced in the future.
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 4:18 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87160 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:17 pm to
The real issue, I think, is continuity. You're not going to get really big nearshoring or domestic production in the next 2-3 years. You'll get a success story here or there, but not enough to justify the upheaval in the eyes of the public. And you're not getting the rebalancing advertised (which isn't surprising).

Even if those things are going to eventually happen (which is generous) - what's the realistic chance we string together enough mixed party leadership to see the meaningful results? My best defense to that is that Biden kept some of the tariff structure (a lot on China) and it's a proof of concept that the Dems may be more willing to leave some of this stuff in place now that Trump has cracked open the seal on it.

But, that's a gamble that could come at high political cost over the next 3 years if the efforts are unraveled AND we lose.

Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
918 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

25.9% effective federal tax rate in 2024.
As we got more settled into our careers, that effective rate starting creeping higher than 20%. The extra ~5% for SS/MC cherry on top had me wanting to join a militia. I have told my children for the last ten years…buy as many guns and as much silver as possible. I don’t know if that will really ever matter, but it sounds like a cool ‘daddy-wisdom’ thing to say.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3215 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

So how does that compare to the 2020s?


17% effective federal tax when top bracket was 91%.

25.9% effective federal tax rate in 2024.

You gonna respond or continue looking stupid and illiterate like you normally do
Posted by Rodo
Houston
Member since Aug 2011
1883 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:24 pm to
The consumer and Wall St pay for the tarrifs. Now, ask yourself who pays for free trade. Middle American labor pays the vast majority. You can't have free trade with countries that do not have your regulatory environment and standard of living. In that scenario, all your doing is exporting labor.

Rodo
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3215 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

That income taxes are more effective/go further for the country's interest when the ultra wealthy have to pay more from the top bracket.


It doesn’t matter what they get taxed because the government will just spend it all and then some.
When taxed too much the people they used to hire are now out of work and rely on government.
It’s a great way to make socialism a reality which you are probably for.
Posted by GamecockUltimate
Columbia,SC
Member since Feb 2019
9427 posts
Posted on 2/24/26 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Estimates between 4-18 percent are out there on exporters eating the cost of the tariffs.


Which is why it's frustrating that the idea of the tarriff money going back to companies is being tossed around. If it goes to anyone , it should be the citizens of the US but goodluck figuring all that out.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram