Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Why does Alex Jones have to pay for media hoax? | Page 8 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Why does Alex Jones have to pay for media hoax?

Posted on 8/5/22 at 5:18 pm to
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

What about him?
You took the position that the press couldn’t defame people in that case. I assume that’s changed now.


Everything is the same!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127458 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 5:21 pm to
You’ve devolved quite a bit in 7 or so years. You good?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127458 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

I didn’t even comment or follow Jones’ case at all until the default judgment was handed down and then the compensatory damage ruling yesterday.


Mea culpa. I lumped you in with the others and improperly so. Apologies.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81427 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

Why does Alex Jones have to pay for media hoax?


And why hasn't Biden had to pay for repeating the Fine People Hoax?

Not only did he not pay, he was rewarded with the presidency.
Posted by taylork37
Member since Mar 2010
15769 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

And why hasn't Biden had to pay for repeating the Fine People Hoax?

Not only did he not pay, he was rewarded with the presidency.


Because your shitty and uninformed political opinions aren't credible legal accusations...
This post was edited on 8/5/22 at 6:38 pm
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
8686 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

The threat of defamation actions is a safeguard against muckraking and similar "journalistic" practices.


Sounds like someone needs to make Trump's lawyers aware of this...
Posted by 504LikeitwasB4
Member since Oct 2021
452 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 6:04 pm to
Fauci didn't pay for his claim that the vax prevented the spread of covid...
Oh wait, it's only freedom of speech when it fulfills the agenda. My bad
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

You’ve devolved quite a bit in 7 or so years. You good?




Bro, you’re the one that has devolved into grievance politics. Jfc!
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 11:49 pm to
(no message)
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 11:51 pm to
quote:

Why is he in a court room in the first place? For what he SAID.

So you think both the 1st and 2nd amendments cannot be infringed
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

on the basis of a huge list of bizarre "coincidences" that no one seems to have a logical explanation for. That's not even getting into the seemingly fake behavior of the purportedly grieving parents.

Why don't you post links to support each of these assertions.

It should be amusing at least.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
54047 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 7:19 am to
quote:

I’m waiting on you to post the exact defamatory quote.

This is silly. Hank stated that Jones repeatedly and publicly accused parents of faking their kids’ deaths. Is that true or not?

This is a message board, and as such we are not held to the same level of proceedings that govern a court of law. That would stifle the discussions. If it’s true, Hank doesn’t have to sort through the transcripts in order to satisfy a message board.

I don’t know a thing about this issue. Jones might be completely innocent as far as I’m concerned. But why don’t you address Hank’s accusation? Did Jones make the accusations Hank claims he made? If so, they seem libelous to me.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
54047 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 7:23 am to
quote:

The medical examiner was all over the board with his supposed findings when he spoke to the media, and he also was cracking jokes, which was really bizarre. There was no sense of urgency from the first responders on the scene

So this was a conspiracy that included the “parents”, the medical examiner, the ambulance drivers, police, etc.? And presumably some people who set the whole thing up? That’s SOME conspiracy. Amazing that they kept it from leaking. Good eye by you guys to catch them out.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Sounds like someone needs to make Trump's lawyers aware of this...


not to worry.
hes suing CNN for calling him a liar.
the suit claims trump believes there was fraud even after barr told him there is none and Sidney Powell admitted in court she made up her stories.


Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 9:28 am to
quote:

But why don’t you address Hank’s accusation? Did Jones make the accusations Hank claims he made? If so, they seem libelous to me.


great post altogether.

Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
25024 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 9:49 am to
He also had like the shittiest lawyers of all time.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31215 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 10:14 am to
quote:


Such a dumb take. Defamation laws exist.


Who was defamed?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 10:18 am to
quote:

So you think both the 1st and 2nd amendments cannot be infringed


Well, only one of them uses that language. Unsurprisingly, it's the one that you fully support infringement upon.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58671 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 10:44 am to
quote:

the suit claims trump believes there was fraud even after barr told him there is none


Guess Barr didn’t check with the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Posted by HVAU
Up over here
Member since Sep 2010
5165 posts
Posted on 8/6/22 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Who was defamed?


In this specific case Neil Heslin which resulted in harassment of her and his wife Scarlet Lewis. In the upcoming case Lenny Posner. Then in Connecticut there are others.

I don’t think this is just about saying somebody’s name though. When a person is showing videos of children’s choirs at sports events and claiming that those are actually the living children from the Sandy Hook massacre, a specific name isn’t necessary. The damage can be done by saying something like “these parents are crisis actors. Their children never died.” When people know what “these parents “ mean I don’t think a name is required.

But…also he named Heslin. He named Posner and published his address on air.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram