Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us the Beastie Boys were more influential overall than Nirvana | Music Board
Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

the Beastie Boys were more influential overall than Nirvana

Posted on 6/6/24 at 10:49 pm
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37907 posts
Posted on 6/6/24 at 10:49 pm
Agree or disagree? I'm not a Nirvana hater, I actually like them quite a bit, and while I was present to witness the shift in pop culture that resulted after Team Spirit, and recognize the impact it had, it seems like the Beasties have never really gotten their due with respect to cultural influence.

Firstly, the music. Licensed to Ill is an ultimate summer jam classic. Yeah, it's juvenile and obnoxious, but so was the band at the time, and most of the target audience. But side 1 captures a perfect moment in time, and, along with Run DMC, introduced hip hop to the suburbs (regardless of whether you think that's a good thing or not), the popularity of which, is still strong with white kids today. The 808 drum machine continues to influence hip hop.

Paul's Boutique- I won't go into this one too much because people love to nerd out on it and anyone on a Gen Xish music board has heard it all before. But widely considered a masterpiece of sampling that had immediate impact on producers like Dr Dre, even if it wasn't considered a smash hit at the time.

Check Your Head- this is one of my favorites ,but to the point of the thread, this is where I feel their influence on 90's culture had the most impact. And that's on fashion/aesthetics. Vintage ringer t-shirts, Ben Davis, baggy pants, Pumas, skate brands like Etnies. Basically 90's skater. The flannel grunge look that Kurt Cobain popularized had a shelf life of a year or two, people were in baggy pants, vintage T's, beanies, and 'old-school' sneakers for most of the decade. It also went a long way to restore punk as a viable genre in the 90's despite containing only a couple punk songs.

Ill Communication was a massive hit and and an amazing album, but at this point, they had so many copycats, I feel like this is where their influence started to wane.

So this isn't just about the music, although I think a case can be made on that, alone, but pop culture in general.

This post was edited on 6/7/24 at 12:30 am
Posted by SouthPlains
Member since Jul 2023
1082 posts
Posted on 6/6/24 at 10:55 pm to
Depends what you mean by “influential”. If you’re talking about musically and who did more people try to emulate? Nirvana takes that in my book.

People in hip hop actually went the opposite way from what the beastie boys were doing - no live instruments, less punk rock, ditching the DJ as part of the act. Hell the 3 guys were Jewish and I didn’t see many Jews flocking to the mic. Whereas with Nirvana, people are still ripping them off…think of all the post-grunge stuff that dominates the airwaves from the mid 90s starting with the likes of Bush and Silverchair, to Creed and Nickelback, to Seether and Puddle of Mudd.

Now, if you’re talking about it from the perspective of uniqueness and turning the world on its head? Beastie Boys all day long. To your point, they made hip hop accessible to the masses, for better or worse. Nirvana wasn’t the gateway drug for an untapped market - they took what was going on in the PNW scene and just did it slightly better. Flannel and jeans wasn’t “grunge”, it was (and still is) standard attire for folks in the PNW.
This post was edited on 6/6/24 at 10:57 pm
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37907 posts
Posted on 6/6/24 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

Whereas with Nirvana, people are still ripping them off…think of all the post-grunge stuff that dominates the airwaves from the mid 90s starting with the likes of Bush and Silverchair, to Creed and Nickelback, to Seether and Puddle of Mudd.

People like Kanye are still sampling and and citing them as a major influence. Love him or hate him (not a big fan myself), he has a wider influence than Puddle of Mudd or Silverchair. Daft Punk claimed them as an influence. You seem to be limiting your examples to rock bands. They've had a huge influence on hip hop, particularly with the popularity of deep bass lines, and production in general.

Even with that limitation, Beastie Boys, arguably paved the way for bands like RATM and "rap metal" in general.


quote:

Flannel and jeans wasn’t “grunge”, it was (and still is) standard attire for folks in the PNW.
BETA Page
I've lived the majority of my life in Seattle (just moved away two years ago), and that just isn't true. It was standard attire for Aberdeen in 1990 and try-hard transplants but absolutely not 'standard attire' in Seattle since at least the mid 90's.

eta-appreciate the thoughtful response though. not just trying to be argumentative.
This post was edited on 6/6/24 at 11:14 pm
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
41930 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 12:49 am to
The fashion you're talking about I think can be more attributed to Green Day and all the pop punk bands coming out around that time. They were the next big thing after Nirvana and all the new people getting into punk in particular were dressing like that. I remember all the Green Day, Offspring, and Rancid fans wearing that kind of stuff.

As for flannel, I still wear it everyday.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23450 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 6:39 am to
I always think of Mike Watt (Minutemen/fIREHOSE) when I think of the influence of flannel in underground/punk rock... Of course the Seattle scene brought it more to the mainstream...

He even dedicated an album name/cover to the cause.. flyin' the flannel..

Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
13032 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 8:25 am to
Easily the Beastie Boys. Nirvana represent the high point of grunge but they weren't revolutionary. Paul's Boutique was a mind blowing change of direction in rap/rock. There is a playlist on Spotify with all the songs that Paul's Boutique sampled that is pretty cool. And I'm not making a who is better distinction here.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
33654 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 9:09 am to
I’m probably in the minority but I don’t think Nirvanas music has held up as well as others.

I think it was perfect timing in the early 90s when kids were desperate for something different
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
47453 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 9:48 am to
it depends on your age. I was in my mid 20’s and 30’s during the 90’s. I couldn’t name a beastie boys song with a gun to my head but I still enjoy nirvana
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86840 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 10:03 am to
Disagree. I don't see how the Beastie Boys were influential at all. It amazes me that anyone listens to them at all other than to get a giggle out of Fight For Your Right. Just terrible "music".
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61816 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 10:30 am to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86840 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 10:43 am to
Posted by timbo
Red Stick, La.
Member since Dec 2011
7900 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 1:46 pm to
I kinda agree with you and I think Nirvana basically changed popular music. Licensed to Ill, Paul's Boutique and Check Your Head helped create rap rock/nu metal. I mean, Kid Rock based much of his career off of variations of "Looking Down the Barrel of A Gun".

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95129 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Agree or disagree?


While I disagree, I would concede that the Beasties were very, very influential on much of what came after. For that matter, folks sleep on Run-DMC.

quote:

along with Run DMC


Hah, I typed before I read that.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
60205 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 5:34 pm to
I’m pretty sure I never bought another rap/hip hop album after 1990, but I can still sing along to almost every track on these:



Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29101 posts
Posted on 6/7/24 at 6:18 pm to
You make a good argument, but Nirvana was still more influential.
Posted by MyRockstarComplex
The airport
Member since Nov 2009
4987 posts
Posted on 6/8/24 at 5:36 am to
I wonder what the butterfly effect would be if License to lll went with the originally planned album title: “Don’t Be A F*gg*t”

I’d say my formative years and run in music are entirely pillared on Nirvana, Beastie Boys, NIN, and Prince.

Also, I don’t think Beasties had the long term impact on hip hop that they deserve because it didn’t fit the narrative the prison system was going for when they collaborated with (funded) the music industry to create a direct pipeline for black youths to go to jail. That meeting was very real.
This post was edited on 6/8/24 at 5:38 am
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 6/8/24 at 8:40 pm to
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31200 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 9:26 pm to
Nirvana inspired more music/bands than beastie boys. And I like beastie boys.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram