- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:18 am to Sam Quint
quote:
I mean, say what you will about the tenets of National Socialism, at least it's an ethos.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:18 am to Sam Quint
Yeah, you can count me in
I said it a couple times- I couldn't see how she could win, but I was also not ready to say he would be called. I had hope, but not extreme confidence.
Watching them hold the call on Georgia and Pennsylvania for hours, when it was sitting over 90% and he was up 100k... kept thinking "here we go".
I said it a couple times- I couldn't see how she could win, but I was also not ready to say he would be called. I had hope, but not extreme confidence.
Watching them hold the call on Georgia and Pennsylvania for hours, when it was sitting over 90% and he was up 100k... kept thinking "here we go".
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:20 am to Scoob
quote:
Watching them hold the call on Georgia and Pennsylvania for hours, when it was sitting over 90% and he was up 100k... kept thinking "here we go".
Yep. I remained fully black pilled until about 0200
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:20 am to Sam Quint
I myself dabbled in pacifism at one point,not in 'Nam of course.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:22 am to floyd of pink
quote:
If the vast majority of the poli board doesnt check in here, they are idiots. For the past year or so, all i've read is people saying there's no way they will let him win.
Well guess what, pussies. He did it
Yes. I kept saying to save the crying until it was appropriate, IF it would be necessary.
Look here baws, it never was ......
That's ok, our flag covers the weak as well as the brave!
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:23 am to Sam Quint
quote:
I'll admit that I was fully black pilled and did not believe there was any way they would allow Trump to win regardless of the votes.
Same.
I thought the machine couldn’t be broken again after 2016.
Glad to be wrong.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:26 am to Sam Quint
It's a long way to the Inauguration. Nothing is official until then. I'm surprised people are so confident after what happened in 2020. I will never underestimate the depravity of the people that want to wield power in this nation.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Stupid.
There is still a large "they won't certify" or "much 14th amendment" population. They won't give up on the doomer dream
Scum like Raskin opposed certification in 2017. They may well try to do the same this time. The fact that Marxist scumbags "won't certify" will be totally irrelevant to the outcome.
"They won't certify" is a probable fact which has no impact whatsoever on the fact Trump will be certified.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:28 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Scum like Raskin opposed certification in 2017.
And how much support did he get?
quote:
They may well try to do the same this time. The fact that Marxist scumbags "won't certify" will be totally irrelevant to the outcome.
"They won't certify" is a probable fact which has no impact whatsoever on the fact Trump will be certified.
The claims are that the DEMs are going to commit to thwarting certification, not that one or two rogue pols get press via puffery.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:28 am to POTUS2024
quote:
It's a long way to the Inauguration. Nothing is official until then. I'm surprised people are so confident after what happened in 2020. I will never underestimate the depravity of the people that want to wield power in this nation.
This doesn't sound like crow eating. Come back later and try again.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:29 am to Sam Quint
quote:
This doesn't sound like crow eating. Come back later and try again.

Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:32 am to Sam Quint
I’m, sadly, one of those peeps. I saw no way they would not throw the whole house at Blumpf and let him win. Lo’ and behold, MAGA 2.0 has risen
Forgiveness [DENIED]ACCEPTED
Congrats to America for this referendum on pedo Joe and his acolytes
Forgiveness [DENIED]ACCEPTED
Congrats to America for this referendum on pedo Joe and his acolytes
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:33 am to Sam Quint
I wasn't posting here but I'll admit I was afraid they'd pull the same shite if it was close enough to get away with.
Instead I had a dangerously increasing boner from about 9 PM EST through 1 AM when it reached peak. Hasn't subsided. I guess that makes me sound more like a blue pilled crow eater.
Instead I had a dangerously increasing boner from about 9 PM EST through 1 AM when it reached peak. Hasn't subsided. I guess that makes me sound more like a blue pilled crow eater.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:No. That is your characterization of "the claims".
The claims are that the DEMs are going to commit to thwarting certification
"The claims" are that the DEMs are committed to obstructing Trump by any means necessary. If attempts at thwarting certification can accomplish that to any extent, Dems will ABSOLUTELY do it.
However, the election was not nearly as close as those "claims" trepidatiously anticipated. Antithetically, many of the same posters hopefully referenced "too big to rig," which is what we actually got.
So, based on the margin, my guess is Dems will largely sideline the "thwarting certification" option, and opt instead for acting like Holier-Than-Thou angelic acceptors of the result, drawing PR contrast to J6.
But they absolutely will obstruct in any way possible. There will be zero cooperation. BAMN!
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:56 am to Sam Quint
It’s still early.
I’m not black pilled. But, it’s still early.
I’m not black pilled. But, it’s still early.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 6:59 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
No. That is your characterization of "the claims".
If it's a threat, then it would be an actual effort.
If it's puffery, then why do they keep bringing up a nothingburger?
quote:
"The claims" are that the DEMs are committed to obstructing Trump by any means necessary.
Specifically him becoming President. That's the discussion. What efforts they will engage him to prevent him from being sworn in as President in 2025.
quote:
So, based on the margin, my guess is Dems will largely sideline the "thwarting certification" option, and opt instead for acting like Holier-Than-Thou angelic acceptors of the result, drawing PR contrast to J6.
I already said this...in July.
Trump landslide. Dems don't do shite as they move to the middle for 2026.
That is COMPLETELY the opposite of the black pilled claims of what is going to happen.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 7:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Specifically him becoming President.
You’re too stupid to argue with.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 7:05 am to the808bass
quote:
You’re too stupid to argue with.
By keeping things on topic? OK pal.
Motte and Bailey fallacy usage should be called out.
This is a thread about doomers/black pilled (the bailey). We are discussing their actual claims, not trying to permit people to dishonestly move the discussion to the motte to sanitize the conversation and make the crazy look less crazy.
The point of this thread is to call the crazy, crazy.
This post was edited on 11/6/24 at 7:06 am
Popular
Back to top



0







