- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lack of Harlem Berry
Posted on 12/28/25 at 4:20 pm to coopsdad
Posted on 12/28/25 at 4:20 pm to coopsdad
Berry would be a dumbass to leave and follow a man that never even fricking plays him. What a joke. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a coaching staff as a whole that made as many dumb decisions as this last season.
0
Posted on 12/28/25 at 4:22 pm to Lester Earl
Yeah, Berry fumbles too much and Durham can't find a hole to save his life. Early in the game, he ran into a huge pile for NO reason. 4 feet to the left there was a hole you could drive a truck through and still would be running. Durham has the worst LOS scrimmage vision I have ever seen. The LSU OL is bad enough for sure but the NCAA DOES now allow you to cut towards daylight. Durham never does.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 4:48 pm to NotaStarGazer
Everything I’ve pretty much heard of Durham I haven’t quite seen yet…
Posted on 12/28/25 at 5:28 pm to lovinLSU
Well his track speed I assume has been hurt by him being injured both seasons and playing hurt. But apparently at Duncanville HS, they always opened a hole for him exactly at the designated spot so he didn't have to change directions at the LOS.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:03 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:
Berry gets a little stronger and more secure with the ball
stop shitting on him, bro!
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:11 pm to coopsdad
Berry told Frank he wasn't going to OM with him and Frank punished him with only 3 carries.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:17 pm to coopsdad
Correct
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:18 pm to Underteaux
Yep
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:19 pm to TaderSalad
We could have ran wild with Berry!
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:23 pm to coopsdad
I’m curious when you think we should have seen another touch for a freshman RB that fumbled?
I mean I love Berry, but how exactly do you think he would have impacted the game in a positive way after he committed our only turnover? In other words, did this actually make a difference?
I mean I love Berry, but how exactly do you think he would have impacted the game in a positive way after he committed our only turnover? In other words, did this actually make a difference?
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:34 pm to OceanMan
quote:
I’m curious when you think we should have seen another touch for a freshman RB that fumbled?
Les, is that you?
Harlem Berry was/is our declared RB1. He was the leading non-QB rusher with 45 yds in 3 carries. No other RB had more than 4. Yes, thats right, 4 yds. So we gutted our offensive chances by benching him. And by the way there were NO points scored off of that TO.
Now, Lane is in a litttle bit of damage control mode to keep Berry although I think it not likely he would follow Wilson now...
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:48 pm to PensaTigers
uh
the sample size is 104 (the denominator) the events is 3 (the numerator)
stating facts isn't an analysis, and you misspelled comparison
not totally sure what this means, but i'm not sure you do either
the sample size is 104 (the denominator) the events is 3 (the numerator)
stating facts isn't an analysis, and you misspelled comparison
quote:
Not analyzing statistics is some libtard shite
not totally sure what this means, but i'm not sure you do either
Posted on 12/28/25 at 6:54 pm to coopsdad
Frank is a great guy and amazing recruiter but he’s an absolutely terrible RB coach.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 11:31 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Harlem Berry was/is our declared RB1. He was the leading non-QB rusher with 45 yds in 3 carries. No other RB had more than 4. Yes, thats right, 4 yds. So we gutted our offensive chances by benching him. And by the way there were NO points scored off of that TO.
Again, specifically at what point would getting berry touches have actually made a difference? Do we really think not rotating Berry back in cost us the game? If so, when? Did we have a RB problem last night?
This seems to be yet another unproductive dig at the previous coaching and regime.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 2:33 am to coopsdad
He mistook Berry for timeouts and vice versa. Only gave Barry three touches but thought he had a half dozen timeouts after the two minute warning.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:44 am to Basura Blanco
Isn't it the running backs coach's job to teach ball security? Frank had all season to teach Berry.
Maybe Frank should have taken himself out of the game after that fumble!
Maybe Frank should have taken himself out of the game after that fumble!
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:46 am to Lester Earl
He's not a really big dude...when he gets stronger this off season, the fumbles will drop.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:50 am to coopsdad
quote:
Lack of Harlem Berry
A proven losing formula.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:58 am to coopsdad
Did someone rewatch the play? Was the knee down as the ball came out?
The broadcast quickly moved on. I wanted a second look.
I would not have pulled him from the game.
The broadcast quickly moved on. I wanted a second look.
I would not have pulled him from the game.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:48 am to coopsdad
… IF berry heads to OM you’ll be able to answer your own question as to
Why
Why
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News