Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us NIL money, not McMahon, the problem with men's basketball | Page 2 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: NIL money, not McMahon, the problem with men's basketball

Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:33 am to
Posted by rented mule
Member since Sep 2005
2754 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Let's see what Coach McMahon can do now that he has a reasonable amount of money to use in securing players


McMahon had the number 17 and 14 recruiting classes 2 of the last 3 years, with current NIL support. Why didn't McMahon do a better job then?
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
9576 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:35 am to
Posted by LINOESC
Member since Jan 2025
472 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:50 am to
Well you’re pretty delusional then. He will prove that theory wrong next year and be fired after the season!!
Posted by MS_Tigers07
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2015
1739 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:52 am to
So I just looked... (via 247 sports)

They had the 14th ranked HS class. (5th in SEC)
They had the 65th ranked transfer class. (14th in SEC) The only two schools below us? South Carolina and Oklahoma.

Overall, they had the 6th best class in the SEC. It's clear he has to use the portal more effectively. Maybe he does have more money to work with now, but who knows.

Either he will do well and make the tournament, or we will be looking for a new coach.



Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
4623 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:54 am to
You have the mentality of a middle schooler.

It does not surprise me IN THE LEAST that you buy the bullshite narrative that McMahon didn't have money.
He had at least middle of the SEC pack money. I don't care what the company line put out by our administration through the media tries to sell anyone. McMahon couldn't have signed several top 20 classes without MONEY!!! Bailey who is absolute garbage was paid $450k last year.

In addition ching chong, even if he was saddled with no money (and he wasn't), if McMahon was a good coach you would have still seen consistent flashes of success, and an upset or three.

NONE OF THAT with this loser!!! And watch what Wade does in the ACC jackass. It'll be the exact opposite of what we have here.

Now here's another statement, and one you will absolutely love: The most impressive feat that McMahon has accomplished at LSU is to make your boyfriend Johnny Jones look like a Hall of Fame coach in comparison.

You really are an unbelievably simple minded person (based on your years of post history), and I am mystified how you actually navigate life with any success at all.
Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
4623 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:02 am to
I hear you, but the WORST thing that can actually happen with McMahon next year is that we sneak into the First Four of the tournament get hammered, and the morons on this board think we have arrived.

This pathetic excuse for a coach either needs to have a solid or better season with a tournament bid AND a win or two to make me or any reasonable fan believe he can be a good coach here, or he needs to repeat or do worse than this past year so it's clear to remove his arse (like Stevie Wonder can't see that shite now after three years of this travesty).
Posted by BowDownToLSU
Livingston louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
21401 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:08 am to
Whatever you say Mascona
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34996 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Overall, they had the 6th best class in the SEC. It's clear he has to use the portal more effectively. Maybe he does have more money to work with now, but who knows.


What McMahon is saying, without saying, in his statement that he "now understands the importance of the transfer portal" is that his approach for the last 3 years was to allocate a big portion of the funds towards HS recruiting with the plan to build a roster by stacking HS signing classes year or year. He now accepts that isn't a path to success anymore. Primarily because (1) most HS signees don't stay at a place for more than 2 years and (2) you can't account for the experience transfers bring to the table.

That said, unless something changes, LSU's transfer capacity for next year is relatively limited. There are only 4 open spots if no more players enter the portal. As of now, the roster will be:

3 True Freshmen
4 Sophomores
2 Seniors/5th year players (Reed and Collins)
4 open spots
Posted by DaBeerz
Member since Sep 2004
18309 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:14 am to
Who believes in him to give them money?
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34996 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:17 am to
quote:

I hear you, but the WORST thing that can actually happen with McMahon next year is that we sneak into the First Four of the tournament get hammered, and the morons on this board think we have arrived.


I agree 1000%

The expectations of the program shouldn't be lowered simply because the expectations for McMahon are incredibly low. Texas just fired a HC, who made the NCAAT 3 straight seasons, for a record/postseason appearance I think many fans on this board would be thrilled with if LSU achieved it next year.

There is NO reason LSU can't build their way to where Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Auburn are now. NONE! That should be the ultimate goal for the program. It takes finding the right coach to make that happen. Being happy with barely making the NCAA Tournament and quickly getting bounced should not be viewed as "good enough"...even if it would be "good" for McMahon.
Posted by MS_Tigers07
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2015
1739 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:20 am to
quote:

There is NO reason LSU can't build their way to where Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Auburn are now.


Until we commit to basketball like they do, we will continue to have the same results. It also helps they all have top 10 coaches in the game.

Can we go steal BYU’s coach? They’re at least fun to watch.
Posted by WaydownSouth
Stratton Oakmont
Member since Nov 2018
10840 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:26 am to
You are wrong Scott.

McMahon was a terrible hire. You should feel bad. Probably should put down the fork as well
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
46681 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

The problem is McMahon has recruited HSers and college basketball is about Senior transfers. VJ Miller is going to be an electric player in 3 years...right now he is a high volume shooter that makes Freshman mistakes. You obviously want to keep him because he is an awesome talent, but even next year, if you plan on being good and not just barely squeak into the NCAAT, VJ Miller should be a guy off the bench like Terry Martin used to be

I could see V Miller transferring to a small school and scoring 20 a game then go back to a P4 school for JR and SR year and we watch him drop 25 in a Sweet 16 game
Your second statement seems more likely now.
Posted by LSUButt
Lowcountry
Member since Jan 2006
15995 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:32 am to
I think LSU has to be at least mid pack of the SEC next year. A 6-12/7-11 sec record then losing the 11 seed game SHOULD get him canned

But we are dealing with Woodward here…
Posted by Pnels08
Member since Jul 2014
10434 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:35 am to
quote:

A 6-12/7-11 sec record



They would definitely keep him if he pulls one of these off. I am assuming as long as he is in Next four outish territory they will run it back as "His best season yet"
Posted by rutiger
purgatory
Member since Jun 2007
21834 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:35 am to
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
25843 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:25 am to
quote:


McMahon had the number 17 and 14 recruiting classes 2 of the last 3 years, with current NIL support. Why didn't McMahon do a better job then?


You have too much faith in the "rankings."
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
46681 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

McMahon had the number 17 and 14 recruiting classes 2 of the last 3 years, with current NIL support. Why didn't McMahon do a better job then?
quote:

You have too much faith in the "rankings."

Now it's the rankings fault.

CoachMc still recruited and signed them. If he was signing the 364th ranked recruiting class, but identifying talent and coaching them well, no one would care about a ranking.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34996 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Until we commit to basketball like they do, we will continue to have the same results.


The "commitment" wasn't there at first. They found the right guy...who secured the commitment. It wasn't that long ago LSU had, at least decent, "commitment" too. At least from an NIL front (even though it wasn't called "NIL"). The right HC will generate it. This isn't like the Kardashian sisters where if you throw enough money at an ugly duckling you can turn her into a swan. Money is not going to overcome poor coaching/leadership.

Get the right guy and, like magic, you'll see the "commitment" (on the NIL side) follow.
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10748 posts
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:07 pm to
How's NIL working for McNeese?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram