- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/26/25 at 8:46 pm to OysterPoBoy
Why Pete Carroll threw on the goal line in the Super Bowl?
Why he had the Heisman Trophy winner on the sideline on fourth and one versus Texas in the Rose Bowl?
Why he had the Heisman Trophy winner on the sideline on fourth and one versus Texas in the Rose Bowl?
Posted on 8/26/25 at 8:52 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:I got two SC grads in my inner circle. I’ve been selectively reminding them of that fact on a regular basis for a long time.
Why he had the Heisman Trophy winner on the sideline on fourth and one versus Texas in the Rose Bowl?
Fight On!
Best Cheerleading Tradition in College Sports
Posted on 8/26/25 at 8:56 pm to SpotCheckBilly
quote:
Gregg Allman and Cher
I can kind of see that one due to music.
But Marilyn Monroe and Joe DeMaggio was a head scratcher….
Posted on 8/26/25 at 8:59 pm to Obtuse1
Why is a guy heard on the news saying "pull it", then WTC 7 going down?
Posted on 8/26/25 at 9:45 pm to SoDakHawk
quote:That's the one I was thinking of.
UAP sightings over New Jersey last fall. There was something like 5,000 sightings and it was all over the news. Then they were just gone and out of the news.
Unrelated--Thomas Crooks sounded like he thought he was smarter and better than everyone. Fitting that he got merc'd by professionals a second after missing his target and will be remembered as an ugly loser POS and massive failure.
Posted on 8/26/25 at 10:54 pm to OysterPoBoy
The plane debris from the Pentagon did not match the 757 that "crashed" into the building...
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:10 pm to LSUSUPERSTAR
quote:
Why is a guy heard on the news saying "pull it", then WTC 7 going down?
where the frick you mo-mo's come from?
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:14 pm to OysterPoBoy
1. Why did Archie not get traded to a real team?
2. Why did Caesar ignore the Ides of March?
3. Why did the Secret Service not do a better job of protecting Lincoln at Ford’s Theater?
4. Why do most people not understand sarcasm?
2. Why did Caesar ignore the Ides of March?
3. Why did the Secret Service not do a better job of protecting Lincoln at Ford’s Theater?
4. Why do most people not understand sarcasm?
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:16 pm to OysterPoBoy
How Mossad had no idea about October 7th and took the IDF like to respond while Hamas went nuts on their population.
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:24 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
After 9/11 I wasn't buying the conspiracy angle but after everything I've seen in the last 25 years I'm on the complete opposite side now.
Yeah, like some guy literally “found” one of the passports of the hijackers on the ground near the World Trade Center immediately after the impact and handed it to a NYC detective before the towers collapsed.
What are the chances of that happening? It’s got to be in the hundreds of millions between the impact, the passport surviving the impact, the passport getting out of his pocket or backpack, flying dozens of feet onto the street ninety stories below, a person noticing the passport among all the debris and paperwork all over the street as well as people fleeing and cops and firefighters coming upon the scene, and then thinking of handing over to a New York detective and we have no idea who handed it over to that detective nor do we have any curiosity of who did.
Obviously the CIA knew about it before hand, and once they boarded their flights put the agent into the field with a charred fake passport of one of the hijackers, and then just handed it off to an NYC detective.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 8/26/25 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:28 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
I still don't believe the attack itself was a conspiracy, but Building 7 is inexplicable to me. I've yet to hear or read any logical explanation why an office fire collapsed that building in the same exact way a controlled demolition would have.
Also the motive for doing it. I know that we’re not being told the truth about Building 7, but it completely eludes me.
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:33 pm to tiger81
quote:
Oswald did act alone. If you don't believe it, read Case Closed. There will be no doubt when you're done.
Oh please. Who am I supposed to believe? That guy who is the only person who thinks Oswald acted alone (alongside Ben Shapiro) or my own lying eyes and ears and basically everyone else. The second shot clearly came from the front.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 8/27/25 at 8:35 am
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:38 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
If you don't see how pathetic it is to still be whining 5 years later about not being able to dine out (indoors) for a few months then I can't help you.
It was way more than that. And if you’re unvaccinated, doubly frick you. You are like the Jewish Ghetto Police if so.
Posted on 8/26/25 at 11:40 pm to JEC119
quote:
Did we ever find out who was sending the anthrax letters? I remember some postal workers or one postal worker dying from it.
Yes, it was the CIA from a stockpile from Anthony Fauci.
Posted on 8/27/25 at 12:11 am to Turnblad85
quote:
where the frick you mo-mo's come from?
He’s right though. That video exists.
Posted on 8/27/25 at 12:31 am to Adam Banks
quote:
I bet you and Corinthians420 patently rejected the lab leak “theory” as well.
You’d be wrong and I have zero fricking clue how you made that connection with my post. Completely objectively speaking, the dude was wrong.
I actually think the leak theory is highly probable. It’s just the “deliberately engineered and released” conspiracy theories I get lost on.
This post was edited on 8/27/25 at 12:33 am
Posted on 8/27/25 at 12:37 am to JEC119
quote:
Did we ever find out who was sending the anthrax letters? I remember some postal workers or one postal worker dying from it.
Most likely culprit was Ivins of USAMRIID. Motive unsure, maybe to promote research funding. When the FBI was about to charge him, he committed suicide which is why the case kinda sat unresolved.
This post was edited on 8/27/25 at 12:40 am
Posted on 8/27/25 at 12:42 am to OysterPoBoy
Bidens aggressive prostate and bone cancer. That usually kills men his age within 6 months.
I seen a news article from Scranton a few weeks ago that didnt mention anything about his cancer but did say how ole Joe is as spry as ever. So either there really is 2 or 3 different Joe Bidens, it was all a lie for some reason or the elite have something that completely cures cancer but won't make it public. All reasons are nefarious.
I seen a news article from Scranton a few weeks ago that didnt mention anything about his cancer but did say how ole Joe is as spry as ever. So either there really is 2 or 3 different Joe Bidens, it was all a lie for some reason or the elite have something that completely cures cancer but won't make it public. All reasons are nefarious.
This post was edited on 8/27/25 at 1:11 am
Posted on 8/27/25 at 1:48 am to LSUSUPERSTAR
This is the quote:
I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.
That is a quote from a doc from Larry Silversrein the lease holder.
The problem with the statement is the verb "pull" does not have a specific direct object. So within the 4 corners of the quote we don't know what or whom was to be pulled just that pulling "it" may be the smartest thing.
Let's consider the context. He is talking to the commander of the fure brigade. He commander has related he does not think they can contain the fire.
Now let's consider the plain reading of the statement Silverstein says he made to the commander. He said there have been a lot of death today maybe the smart thing to do is pull "it". Is it not the most logical conclusion within the context and the words is "it" means the fire fighting effort?
Now you make the argument as to what you think that "it" means and decide whether or not that is supported by the context and plain reading.
Then watch the video and note how many of the facts the CT leans on are rebutted by the video and the failure mode is supported by the video and the internal structure of the building and how the CT theorists only use certain angles and manipulated video.
I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.
That is a quote from a doc from Larry Silversrein the lease holder.
The problem with the statement is the verb "pull" does not have a specific direct object. So within the 4 corners of the quote we don't know what or whom was to be pulled just that pulling "it" may be the smartest thing.
Let's consider the context. He is talking to the commander of the fure brigade. He commander has related he does not think they can contain the fire.
Now let's consider the plain reading of the statement Silverstein says he made to the commander. He said there have been a lot of death today maybe the smart thing to do is pull "it". Is it not the most logical conclusion within the context and the words is "it" means the fire fighting effort?
Now you make the argument as to what you think that "it" means and decide whether or not that is supported by the context and plain reading.
Then watch the video and note how many of the facts the CT leans on are rebutted by the video and the failure mode is supported by the video and the internal structure of the building and how the CT theorists only use certain angles and manipulated video.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News