Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Togo Island/Swamp Donkey Sting | Page 7 | Outdoor Board
Started By
Message

re: Togo Island/Swamp Donkey Sting

Posted on 12/26/25 at 9:54 am to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86848 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Yes, yes I would laugh at you about shooting “management bucks” in a free range environment.
Meh, the term is maligned unnecessarily.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13106 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Meh, the term is maligned unnecessarily.

I agree. You don't shoot management bucks to increase antler size. You shoot them to reduce deer population.

Last weekend my nephew killed a 225# buck that was 15 inches wide and a 6pt with heavy horns. Probably at least 5yo or maybe 6 or 7yo.

We shot him because we shoot our bucks when they get to that age regardless of antler size. If they antlers are big, then it's a trophy. If the antkers are small, then it's a management buck
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86848 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 10:35 am to
quote:

We shot him because we shoot our bucks when they get to that age regardless of antler size. If they antlers are big, then it's a trophy. If the antkers are small, then it's a management buck
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
28759 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 11:10 am to
I've been trying to get someone to shoot this one all year, his horns have been that way for two years now.

Management, Cull, whatever you want to call it I'm tired of feeding him

[/img]
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26740 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 11:29 am to
quote:

…the term is maligned….


Agreed, however it’s almost impossible to positively effect genetics in free ranging deer herds.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86848 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 11:38 am to
quote:

positively effect
I know this is the popular thing to say, but the fact remains that this buck will no longer breed. He will no longer eat. We must shoot bucks.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26740 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:

We must shoot bucks.


Absolutely

Point out where I said otherwise.

I’m simply stating that if your goal is quality management of your deer herd, eliminating deer based on perceived genetic inferiority ain’t the way to go.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86848 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Point out where I said otherwise.
I did not say you said otherwise.
quote:

if your goal is quality management of your deer herd, eliminating deer based on perceived genetic inferiority ain’t the way to go.
It absolutely is be when combined with age. It's the predicting the future part where people go wrong.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26740 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

It’s the predicting the future part where people go wrong.


Agreed

So in the early 2000’s we had a buck on our place in Illinois that was easily identifiable. It had a half tail. We figure a coyote may have gotten it when it was young and it eventually escaped. Anyway, it was easy to confirm which buck he was from the time he was young.

When he was four, he was a narrow, thin eight and some in our group used the “management buck” criteria to put him on the shooters list.

When he was five, he was again a narrow eight, but had gained some decent mass. Still, he was only about 14 inches wide and so when he walked by a friend on a late October hunt, he shot him. Right square in the arse.

Non fatal, the deer disappeared for the remainder of the season.

As a six year old, he was again a narrow eight point but now he had some really nice mass. I field judged him at 140 to 150 inches. Again, he was placed on the shooters list but no one got close to him.

And then came the year he turned seven. The growth was astonishing. He blew up into a 10, probably 18 inches wide but with mass you dream about. He was killed that season on the adjacent property and scored 173”.

That one encounter with a free ranging deer, combined with research from guys like Charlie Alshiemer taught me that we can never fully know what a deer is going to grow into given enough time.

And for that reason I simply refuse the “management buck” theory on free range deer.

Younger bucks need to be killed as you mentioned in order to gather baseline data and determine if your management plan is actually working. However, those deer shouldn’t be shot under the guise of helping to genetically alter the local wild herd.
This post was edited on 12/26/25 at 12:05 pm
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26740 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

I’m tired of feeding him


Do you have more than one season of photos of him?
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
28759 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Do you have more than one season of photos of him?


Yes, his rack was smaller last year but the left side only had that spike horn.

We assume he was injured or something, I've heard if they have a limb injury it can cause this but who knows.

Everyone has stopped hunting so he will make it another year if he survives natural death.
Posted by Jim Hopper
Ocean Springs Mississippi
Member since Sep 2019
4644 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

That one encounter with a free ranging deer, combined with research from guys like Charlie Alshiemer taught me that we can never fully know what a deer is going to grow into given enough time.
agree with pretty much all of this because I’ve harvested 2 separate deer who blew up at 7 becoming non typical deer. However i look at as a numbers game. On my properties 4-5 year old 8 points are still going to get harvested so more food can be available to the 2-3 year old 10 points or better. It’s not a correct way to do it but its been successful and we both seen outliners of bucks blowing up at older ages but its been rare but possible.
Posted by 257WBY
Member since Feb 2014
7363 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 3:22 pm to
My guess is the state is happy to offer more buck tags in their battle against CWD. Especially if the club will shoot older bucks, which have a higher rate of CWD.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86848 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 8:34 am to
Mississippi wanted the river clubs to shoot 50% of their deer.
Posted by Citica8
Duckroost, LA
Member since Dec 2012
4015 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Last weekend my nephew killed a 225# buck that was 15 inches wide and a 6pt with heavy horns. Probably at least 5yo or maybe 6 or 7yo.

Sounds like a trophy. Pics?
Posted by upgrade
Member since Jul 2011
14690 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Younger bucks need to be killed as you mentioned in order to gather baseline data and determine if your management plan is actually working


Yeah, I’m doing my part here.
Posted by jeranamo17
Member since Dec 2025
6 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 2:13 pm to
Why would it be hard to believe? I can guarantee they have flown drones over the property as well as everyone else in the CWD areas. But to step foot on our property and search they still have to have probable cause. If they saw something on a drone, that would give them probable cause. But we have nothing to see. So why is it hard to believe? I love that a place you don’t actually hunt occupies so much of your time and head space
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26740 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

…probable cause


I was sitting at the camp one day during hunting season. It was the first year of the CWD bait ban in Louisiana. The phone rings and my landowner asks if I’ve seen any GW’s around. Just about the time I was about to say no, someone knocked on the door.

When I opened it there were to Wardens standing there asking if they could speak to the owner. When I told he wasn’t around but that I was the land manager they took out a phone with OnX and asked about a particular spot on the property.

Is this part of this property?

Yes it is.

Okay, we have reason to suspect that baiting is taking place. One of them took a small zip lock bag out of his pocket and asked me to identify its contents. I looked at the bag and then looked at each of them expecting to see them smiling. I honestly thought they were playing a joke on me.

I asked, are you guys serious?

Yes sir. Can you identify this? We found a pile of it on this property.

Guys, that’s fertilizer and wheat seed that obviously fell out of the spreader when we parked it. It then rained and washed the residue out of the seeder onto the ground.

Well, we’re going to have it tested anyway. Thanks for your time.

This is what they can legally call “probable cause.”
Posted by Turnblad85
Member since Sep 2022
5031 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

jeranamo17


It's nice of the members to let their help kill a few deer. I know you work hard for it.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13106 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:40 pm to
The latest rumor on this is that they are investigating the presence of farm raised deer transported onto the property for clients to harvest. They apparently have a money and paperwork trail back to a deer farn.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram