- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 12 year worldwide meta-analysis study revealed Chemotherapy has a 97% failure rate.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 10:29 pm to KillTheGophers
Posted on 2/14/26 at 10:29 pm to KillTheGophers
Chemo is the only drug that doctors actually make money from when people take it. The doctor buys the chemo and literally sells it to his patients for thousands of dollars mark up value. They make a few thousand Everytime someone takes it.
It's the only drug that is sold this way , the only drug that doctors can sell directly to patients and make money off of.
Chemo is nothing more than mustard gas that was used in world war 2 , it kills cancer cells but it also kills good cells . It's like finding a rotten floor in your house and burning your whole house down instead of fixing the one floor .
There are many cures for cancer natural cures but doctors don't make millions of dollars off of natural cures. B17 , high doses of vitamin D , fasting for days will all help cure cancer cells, cutting out all sugars which cancer feeds on will help but most people only listen to bought and brainwashed doctors who tell you what they have been taught to tell you from years of indoctrination.
It's the only drug that is sold this way , the only drug that doctors can sell directly to patients and make money off of.
Chemo is nothing more than mustard gas that was used in world war 2 , it kills cancer cells but it also kills good cells . It's like finding a rotten floor in your house and burning your whole house down instead of fixing the one floor .
There are many cures for cancer natural cures but doctors don't make millions of dollars off of natural cures. B17 , high doses of vitamin D , fasting for days will all help cure cancer cells, cutting out all sugars which cancer feeds on will help but most people only listen to bought and brainwashed doctors who tell you what they have been taught to tell you from years of indoctrination.
0
Posted on 2/14/26 at 10:56 pm to Ailsa
Anyone with any sense knows the chemotherapy racket is just that. My highest contempt is for oncologists, the modern day equivalent of medieval blood-letters, who actually tell desperate patients that they’re “cancer free.” Knowing that there’s no way to know that for sure. These witch doctors take your last dime and vacation in Europe while you puke your guts out in the tub.
This post was edited on 2/14/26 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:22 pm to Ailsa
quote:
There are cures but they will not release them as cancer is too profitable.
One of the absolute dumbest talking points to anyone with an IQ above 50
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:22 pm to Ailsa
quote:
I know two researchers that both found cures for cancer but when they presented their findings they were told to bury them...cancer is too profitable.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:23 pm to LintLicker
quote:
There’s so much more money in chronic disease managed pharmacologically than cured pharmacologically or naturally.
Another retard.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:27 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
The problem is people think a “cure” to cancer means we just don’t get it anymore
Ahh someone’s IQ is above 50! Refreshing to see someone else understand the difference between “cure” and “eradication!”
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:30 pm to Penrod
quote:
The funny thing about this is just using elementary logic shows the stupidity of it. Who came up with these cures? Why wouldn’t they go to market with them? If it’s Big Pharma that owns the current technology then why did they spend so much R&D looking for cures that they were never going to use? Why would we ever get medical advances if this were true? It’s laughable.
It takes a millisecond of 5th grade level critical thinking to debunk the whole “cures are being buried bc they aren’t profitable” nonsense.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:31 pm to the808bass
quote:
Think how much a cure for cancer would be worth for an individual. My daughter gets cancer and I wouldn’t pay every dollar anyone would give me for the cure?
And despite this cure, there will still be patients diagnosed with cancer daily. Besides the fact it’s just the right thing to do for humanity, it sounds extraordinarily profitable to me
This post was edited on 2/14/26 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:33 pm to Ailsa
quote:
I know two researchers that both found cures for cancer but when they presented their findings they were told to bury them...cancer is too profitable.
That’s nothing. In the 70s a guy designed a carburetor that got 100 mpg. Big oil bought the patent from him and buried it so nobody else could replicate his work.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 11:53 pm to Flats
People aren't wrong to intuit that distortions in medical markets exist and they make this intuitive cognitive jump:
If the system has profit distortions --> maybe breakthroughs get hidden.
But how distortions actually show up in the world is really quite complex & variable depending on the kind of distortion. E.g., high prices yields access barriers, patent games result in delays in generics, administrative complexity turns into waste, and there is a robust literature for all of it. But where is that for suppressed cures? You can't find it and have to appeal to CT-logic (conspirators naturally conceal evidence) to preserve the possibility, and that's plausible enough to keep people hanging in for it if they're motivated to believe it (and lots of people get shafted by the medical system in many ways and many other industries as well, so there are lots of such people out there). Unfound suppressed cures could of course just still be hidden just waiting to be found, but meanwhile year after year modern medicine is doing this to cancer survival whether those suppressed cures are there or not:
If the system has profit distortions --> maybe breakthroughs get hidden.
But how distortions actually show up in the world is really quite complex & variable depending on the kind of distortion. E.g., high prices yields access barriers, patent games result in delays in generics, administrative complexity turns into waste, and there is a robust literature for all of it. But where is that for suppressed cures? You can't find it and have to appeal to CT-logic (conspirators naturally conceal evidence) to preserve the possibility, and that's plausible enough to keep people hanging in for it if they're motivated to believe it (and lots of people get shafted by the medical system in many ways and many other industries as well, so there are lots of such people out there). Unfound suppressed cures could of course just still be hidden just waiting to be found, but meanwhile year after year modern medicine is doing this to cancer survival whether those suppressed cures are there or not:
This post was edited on 2/15/26 at 12:12 am
Posted on 2/15/26 at 7:13 am to SlowFlowPro
two thumbs up
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:32 am to St Augustine
quote:
This is the dumbest shite. So they let relatively young folks die rather quickly instead of drawing out the treatment for years and actually making more money?
Seems like if they “cure” the able bodied people of cancer with these hidden cures they could then profit off of other maladies or relapses, etc.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. part 1:
Pharmaceutical companies, the media, and the medical industrial complex have been lying to us for years about wellness. And one of the biggest webs of lies they feed us is about cancer. Fifty years ago, Rick Hill was given 60 days to live by the Mayo Clinic where he was having his cancer treated.
After grueling surgery and morphine for pain management, the cancer spread throughout his entire body. With no real hope left, Rick was told about an alternative treatment that was helping a whole host of people recover—for good.
He took a risk and traveled to Tijuana for something that was not widely available previously and something that the medical industrial complex warns us about. It’s not ivermectin, and it’s not fenbendazole. It’s a combination of Laetrile, enzymes, and a few other key factors. And this treatment saved Rick’s life.
He’s now been cancer-free for 50 years because of it. Rick joins us today to tell his story and explain how this treatment is saving the lives of those experiencing aggressive forms of cancer we’re seeing right now.
.......................
part 2
Then Rick got a letter in the mail. Just one sentence, from a pastor affiliated with the John Birch Society: “If you want to live, you’re going to need to leave the Mayo Clinic.”
Rick called the pastor in disbelief. “You want me to leave the citadel of modern medicine?” he asked.
“Yeah,” the man replied. “They know all about medicine—but they don’t know much about the immune system.”
The pastor told Rick to fly to San Diego… then cross into Tijuana—as soon as possible. At first, Rick thought it was a joke. “I don’t want to drink tequila,” he said. “You want me to go eat apricots in Tijuana?”
Later that night, Rick broke the news to his family.
They stared at him in stunned silence. One brother said, “We always knew you were stupid—we just didn’t know how stupid.”
But then something unexpected happened.
“My father-in-law stood up and said, ‘I like it. I’ll take him. And I’ll help pay for it.’”
That moment changed everything.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:35 am to Penrod
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. “They [kill] a lot of people sooner than they would have if they had just actually left them alone.”
Dr. Gene Posca explains that the FDA has had a troubling history of approving experimental drugs while sidelining safety.
Yes, many of these drugs shrank tumors — but there was a devastating cost.
“[Patients] died more often and earlier,” Dr. Posca lamented.
It’s a grave reminder that efficacy is not the most important aspect of a drug — safety is. And this reality is one that the medical industry has ignored for far too long.
#ad: This clip comes from an eye-opening new film by @TTAVOfficial.
If you’ve wondered why Americans are sicker than ever — and why no one stopped it — this film lays it all out.
I’ve already watched it, and it tells the corruption story masterfully. You can watch it now for free here:
https://unpackthelies.com/fox
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:37 am to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:39 am to mauser
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Chemotherapy is so toxic that the people who make it have to wear hazmat suits and gloves. What about radiation? The problem with radiation treatment for cancer is that it damages DNA. And what's the consequence of damaging DNA? Potentially cancer.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:42 am to onmymedicalgrind
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.For the other 95%, chemo is “palliative at best,” he said. The truly sobering detail that Dr. Marik mentioned was that despite advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgical treatments over the past 30 years, the overall life expectancy of a cancer patient has been extended by a measly 3.9 months.
Dr. Marik urges cancer patients to ask their oncologists a vital question: “Is this [chemotherapy] going to cure my cancer, or is it just going to palliate and extend my life a month or two with terrible side effects?”
“Hopefully, they’ll be honest,” he added
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:50 am to Ailsa
Well, I guess that makes me a 3%er, saved my life
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:52 am to phaz
This thread is a perfect illustration of the horror of the internet.
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 2/16/26 at 10:58 am to phaz
Chemo gave my mother an additional 10 years of enjoyable life
It’s not perfect and going to help or save everyone but it’s not evil either
This thread does make me think of the movie “Dallas Buyers Club” though
FDA is certainly gate keeping good treatments that could help or at the least wouldn’t hurt someone in desperate need of any hope
It’s not perfect and going to help or save everyone but it’s not evil either
This thread does make me think of the movie “Dallas Buyers Club” though
FDA is certainly gate keeping good treatments that could help or at the least wouldn’t hurt someone in desperate need of any hope
Posted on 2/16/26 at 11:11 am to KillTheGophers
quote:
97% failure rate seems mathematically impossible.
statistically, would doctors not push other forms of treatments if 97% is the number
Most doctors will not take chemo or radiation therapy themselves if they are diagnosed with cancer but prefer to live out their lives and when needed, be made comfortable with palliative care.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News