- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bill Clinton to Snitch on Trump
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:28 pm to davyjones
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:28 pm to davyjones
quote:
Can I assume that you also believe that it’s possible for Clinton to have done such, and in the same universe Trump did no such thing??
Yes.
Regardless of what the mouth breathing moron in the post above yours thinks, the point of my post wasn't Trump, it was Clinton.
Trump's name is only in it because that's who Clinton presumes to "testify" against.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:29 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
That’s because you’re a moron. All evidence is to the contrary.
That's why I said "theoretically possible," not probable.
You fricking dullard.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:30 pm to Leopold
quote:
Also, do I believe he blew a guy named 'Bubba'?
No you don’t. You just don’t want him to be president and don’t care if clear lies bring him down. Hint: they won’t…so you’re just making a complete fool of yourself for nothing.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:30 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
That's why I said "theoretically possible," not probable. You fricking dullard.

Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:33 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Trump's name is only in it because that's who Clinton presumes to "testify" against.
Is that actually the case, or perhaps I could ask is that a thing, beyond just chatter on online discussion forums? Genuine question.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:36 pm to dafif
quote:
If you do not have the evidence, I will report this to the mods because to accuse someone of that is as obscene as it gets and you should be banned.
He boldly and bravely stands behind his allegation, and fears no reprisal, for his work is just…….as long as he can hide behind the anonymity that this forum provides.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:41 pm to davyjones
quote:
He boldly and bravely stands behind his allegation,
It is not an "allegation" what he wrote is legally libel. Not sure the board mods want to allow this forum to be spreading libel. Creates a bit of an issue for them as well.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:47 pm to dafif
Well, I’ll reserve commentary on the legal aspects of what you’re referring to, but at least for now I will definitely say that it’s a sorry arse post, from, and he leaves me no choice here, from a sorry arse poster. It is a bridge too far, IMO.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:53 pm to SoFlaGuy
Bill ain't snitching shite.
Hillary would have used it in 2016. Check this out. This bitch went to epic lengths to muster up a fake dossier of Russian collusion that tried to derail Trump's run. Now dont you think if Epstien was on the table, she would have in a "New York" second used it to win her presidency?
Bill snitching on Trump is wild.
Hillary would have used it in 2016. Check this out. This bitch went to epic lengths to muster up a fake dossier of Russian collusion that tried to derail Trump's run. Now dont you think if Epstien was on the table, she would have in a "New York" second used it to win her presidency?
Bill snitching on Trump is wild.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:58 pm to Speckhunter2012
Better than what Monica spit
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:06 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
Now dont you think if Epstien was on the table, she would have in a "New York" second used it to win her presidency?
And would have been used again in 2024. Yet, nothing. Yeah this point has been raised about 763 times, and each time it’s ignored by 98% of those who continue to insist that Trump’s a pedophile, and it’s all there in “the files.” And of course it would have been known to co-conspirators as well, obviously, Clinton(s) in this case, who again as you’ve astutely pointed out - they have apparently elected not to use this supposed Presidential campaign-killing info against Trump. Not even to help her own campaign. It would have all but guaranteed her victory. But I guess out of the goodness of her heart, being such a stand up person, she declined to do it.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:29 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Same thing can be said about the morons claiming Trump did anything nefarious with Epstein. Right? Oh wait…you’re one of those morons. the irony.
I think Trump’s no more guilty than that piece of shite Clinton. And maybe not even as guilty. And hell I think Donnie’s more into porn stars than 14 and 15
Year olds.
And back to the original point, what I thought; So no proof.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:30 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
And back to the original point, what I thought; So no proof.
No proof of what? That he was an fbi informant. I agree. There is however proof that the attorney of one of Epsteins victims said Trump was the ONLY person willing to help his client and talk to the authorities.
What does that tell you?
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:15 am to boosiebadazz
Sounds a lot like hubris…
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:55 am to SoFlaGuy
Imagine if in like 1992 I told you that Clinton would be impeached for lying under oath about getting a blowie from an intern and that it would undermine his credibility over 20 years later during a hearing about pedophile stuff during the Donald Trump administration.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:00 am to MikeD
quote:
This is the guy that said he smoke weed, but didn’t inhale
And sticking his dik in some fat chicks mouth and then coming all over her face isn't 'having sex' with her.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:56 am to SoFlaGuy
Literally lost his law license for perjury and obstruction of justice.
Popular
Back to top


1







