- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Foreign-Born Judge Controls Trump’s National Security Powers
Posted on 12/25/25 at 12:18 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Posted on 12/25/25 at 12:18 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
IDGAF where he was born or if he’s naturalized or not. His allegiance is not solely to the US and he’s not an elected official. He should not be stonewalling executive action.
Full stop.
Full stop.
1
Posted on 12/25/25 at 12:23 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
He may think he does, but that order is a dead man walking.
No one has a right to a security clearance and as C-in-C, Trump has the unfettered discretion in granting or revoking them.
No one has a right to a security clearance and as C-in-C, Trump has the unfettered discretion in granting or revoking them.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 12:29 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The problem/issue is that Trump has a tendency to completely ignore the established/statutory procedures for doing things that he does have (eventually) the right to do. he cuts corners, and thereby violates the law.
There's no "procedure" for revoking a security clearance. You have one or you don't and your ability to maintain it is at the whim of the authority that can grant or revoke it.
Wanna guess who that authority is?
Posted on 12/25/25 at 1:26 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
ignoring binding precedent that says otherwise
Our courts are trash.
quote:
expected, Trump cut corners.
The courts create corners not justified by the constitution all the time.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 1:29 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
In the US Constitution and our system of laws? Abso-fricking-lutely.
You like to stack retarded like sfp.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 1:42 pm to udtiger
You're wasting your time talking to an idiot that tosses his salad in his mom's basement to fans only sluts and reads Democratic underground and Reddit like they're the sole truth.
I'd like to meet some of these morons in real life. Just have a conversation over a beer and see in person how truly fricked up they are.
I'd like to meet some of these morons in real life. Just have a conversation over a beer and see in person how truly fricked up they are.
This post was edited on 12/25/25 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 12/25/25 at 2:25 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
So, one judge gets to determine who gets security clearance? Theoretically, that judge could allow any of our enemies access to classified information.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 2:42 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:Engrish prease.
You like to stack retarded
Posted on 12/25/25 at 2:49 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:Only those who are born here from parents who are citizens should be in these types of positions.
naturalized US citizen
Posted on 12/25/25 at 2:51 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
This case involves the government’s retribution against a lawyer because he represented whistleblowers and other clients who complained about the government, carried out by summarily canceling the attorney’s security clearance without any of the process that is afforded to others.
In a nutshell - without any of the process afforded to others - not "due process" not "mandatory process"
This judge just ruled on "feels" because others had some other reason rather than a unilateral termination of a security clearance.
This is a quick reversal and... again, our feckless house refuses to punish judges that are incompetent at best and plain evil at worst.
From ChatGPT: Department of Navy v. Egan (1988): This Supreme Court case affirmed the president's authority over national security decisions, including the revocation of security clearances. It emphasized the executive branch's sole responsibility in these matters, making it difficult for courts to intervene.
This post was edited on 12/25/25 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 12/25/25 at 2:53 pm to loogaroo
quote:
I don't know if it's Hank
Oh, it’s Hank all right. I don’t think he even bothers to deny it. Admins are asleep at the switch on this one.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 2:55 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
He was born less than ten miles north of upstate New York.
And yet you posted a pic of Toronto over 80 miles away. What a dummy.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 3:05 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The First Amendment prohibits government officials from retaliating against people for engaging in ... protected activities. See Nieves v. Bartlett, 587 U.S. 391, 398 (2019)
So, if the attorney says "I'm going to give state secrets to everyone". That's a violation of his free speech for removal of security clearance ? Right....
SCOTUS has spoken on this - I'm riding with them until they say otherwise
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:14 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
EXCEPT where the White House acts in violation of the Constitution. Here, the contention is that the White House revoked Zaid's clearance in violation of his First Amendment rights. In particular, the contention is that Trump revoked the clearance because Zaid has been critical of Trump.
Unless there is a fundamental right to a security clearance, the reason for the revocation is meaningless.
There isn't.
The President has absolute authority.
That's why every other lawsuit against Trump by other lawyers has FAILED on the issue of the revocation of security clearances.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:17 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He should not be stonewalling executive action.
So you dont believe there should be any checks on executive action?
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:21 pm to texag7
quote:I posted a pic of a city in ONTARIO. A pic of a city that most well-read people would recognize ... in response to the stupid-assed post about this judge coming from the "third world." No one would have recognized a photo of Kingston, Ontario. Hell, most have never HEARD of Kingston, Ontario.quote:And yet you posted a pic of Toronto over 80 miles away
He was born less than ten miles north of upstate New York.
You seem to be chronically angry at everyone and everything. Take a breath. Relax before you have an aneurysm.
This post was edited on 12/25/25 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:37 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Nobody cares what you think Hank. Your current account won’t be active much long.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:40 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I posted a pic of a city in ONTARIO. A pic of a city that most well-read people would recognize
Ontario isn’t a city it’s a province
Go pretend to be well traveled somewhere else you dummy.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:43 pm to texag7
quote:I am aware ... though I am surprised that YOU are.
Ontario isn’t a city it’s a province
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:44 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
I’ve traveled there over a half dozen times for business.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News