- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Historical polar motion... has fully ended
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:12 pm to m2pro
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:12 pm to m2pro
So not even 1 km of change per decade?
So over 5000 years we're looking at a 300 to 500 km shift in altitude max?
So Lake Charles would be looking at weather similar to Hot Springs Arkansas in 500 years?
So not exactly 'don't service your AC' type change over the next five centuries
Thanks for letting us know, we'll be ready
So over 5000 years we're looking at a 300 to 500 km shift in altitude max?
So Lake Charles would be looking at weather similar to Hot Springs Arkansas in 500 years?
So not exactly 'don't service your AC' type change over the next five centuries
Thanks for letting us know, we'll be ready
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 11:17 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:13 pm to DarthRebel
quote:Because if the Earth's core decouples, elevations will change all over the world. Just because something is at 7k feet today, doesn't mean it will stay that way
I am going to need a 140IQ person to explain how Orlando is above sea level and Vail ski resort is under water?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:19 pm to somethingdifferent
That’s not how any of this works
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:21 pm to Spocks Brain
quote:Excellent overview. We'll apparently have a good idea by June but could know sooner
If you want this taken seriously (and I mean really seriously), here’s what would be required:
1. Persistence over 6–12 months
2. Agreement across:
• IERS C04
• Independent VLBI solutions
• LOD anomalies
3. A physical mechanism, not just curve-fitting
4. Error analysis showing this is not endpoint bias
5. Demonstration that previous Chandler collapses are qualitatively different
quote:I think this is why most physicists are in a wait and see mode. The data will paint the picture
Now it’s time to slow the inference down to match the physics
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:25 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Feel free to investigate on your own. People are getting bent out of shape for the wrong reason. A person looked at some data from NOAA and IERS and make an extrapolation. He apparently showed his mathematical calculations. Yes, there are alternative viewpoints. It's either going to happen or not. We don't know right now. We should have a much clearer picture by June. If the data is an anamoly, stand down from red alert. Otherwise, get your earthly affairs in order because we're about to experience turbulence
Who the frick are these people supposed to be and why should I care about them?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:28 pm to m2pro
Hey, listen OP.
I was just talking to some buddies the other day about a hike I did and how much shift there has been in magnetic north since the 70s and early 80s (based on an old topo map I had sent to me by one of my men, that he found from this thing we did in Latin America).
So when I got home, after crunching the numbers on the AT with an old SOCOM buddy of mine ... we did an overlay and then put the question to grok .... and it blew our minds. It has drifted about 750 miles from where it was on the old maps we were issued on that mission.
Then we called another one of our buddies, over in Atlanta, who had been a base commander up in Alaska, and presented him with the numbers and he told us he was aware that the drift was accelerating even back before he retired 10 years ago.
For any map readers who have ever relied on topo maps and had to put a compass on a map ... it's a dramatic thing to suddenly see and realize.
I don't see how it cannot be a potential catastrophe in the making ... but Grok says there's nothing to worry about any time soon. It's arching toward Siberia.
I was just talking to some buddies the other day about a hike I did and how much shift there has been in magnetic north since the 70s and early 80s (based on an old topo map I had sent to me by one of my men, that he found from this thing we did in Latin America).
So when I got home, after crunching the numbers on the AT with an old SOCOM buddy of mine ... we did an overlay and then put the question to grok .... and it blew our minds. It has drifted about 750 miles from where it was on the old maps we were issued on that mission.
Then we called another one of our buddies, over in Atlanta, who had been a base commander up in Alaska, and presented him with the numbers and he told us he was aware that the drift was accelerating even back before he retired 10 years ago.
For any map readers who have ever relied on topo maps and had to put a compass on a map ... it's a dramatic thing to suddenly see and realize.
I don't see how it cannot be a potential catastrophe in the making ... but Grok says there's nothing to worry about any time soon. It's arching toward Siberia.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:28 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:It has already been stated that there are alternative viewpoints. The data isn't conclusive right now but it's definitely something that's possible
That’s not how any of this works
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:55 pm to somethingdifferent
Basic geological knowledge says different.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 2:34 am to m2pro
I can't believe I live in a time where I'd get to experience at least 10 apocalypses in 25 years.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:41 am to somethingdifferent
quote:First off, the magnetic field generated in Earth's outer (molten fluid) core is caused by, not the cause of, coupling. "Coupling" itself is gravitational, not magnetic.
The rebuttal is Core-Mantle Decoupling. If the magnetic field fails, the crust and mantle become "free" from the core.
A shift in flow of Earth's molten outer core can cause a magnetic shift, and this has happened many times in Earth's history.
However, there is no scenario where the crust and/or mantle becomes “free” of the core in a physical sense, and as stated, there is no circumstance in which Earth meets any Dzhanibekov criterion, much less all of them.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 5:49 am
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:44 am to somethingdifferent
quote:No it isn't.
It's just an acknowledgement of something that could happen based on data we currently have.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:52 am to m2pro
Well I'll be 65 next week. This better not frick around with my Gunsmoke or Bonanza episodes!

Posted on 1/3/26 at 5:54 am to m2pro
Interesting to theorize but it will be inconsequential.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 6:59 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
A shift in flow of Earth's molten outer core can cause a magnetic shift, and this has happened many times in Earth's history.
However, there is no scenario where the crust and/or mantle becomes “free” of the core in a physical sense, and as stated, there is no circumstance in which Earth meets any Dzhanibekov criterion, much less all of them.
How this is not common knowledge is an indictment of our educational system - HOWEVER the larger problem is the ease with which nonsense 'theories' such as this can find any support whatsoever.
Shows total ignorance wrt any aspect of how the universe works or the basics of logical reasoning.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:09 am to m2pro
This world will end one day…. Get your heart right with Jesus and quit worrying about it…
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:52 am to m2pro
quote:You quit the meds?
If you are in America, and find some weird way to survive the oceanic flooding and violence that comes with that, move as far northeast as you can. Before that, only those that find themselves 5000ft above sea level have even a remote shot. Ground salinity from oceanic flooding will render farming useless for a couple years before rain has washed the grounds clean. Greenland is ideal for the new equator.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 8:25 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:As I said when science sold out to climate change and some of the healthcare bullshite, credibility lost is not easily regained. Lack of credibility opens the doors for folks to thumb their nose at basic physics (because all mainstream science is called to question) and instead make bank off of pseudointellectual fantasy. Sad.
HOWEVER the larger problem is the ease with which nonsense 'theories' such as this can find any support whatsoever.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:03 am to m2pro
So, what does this mean? What is the result of the polar shift? Don’t just leave us hanging, brah.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 9:13 am to BTROleMisser
Man is the causation for pole change. Man’s use of electronic devices has affected the magnetic fields of earth and created an existential threat. We must immediately ban cell phones, computers, and A/Cs. The tipping point will occur within 5 years. We must act NOW!
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 1/3/26 at 11:22 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Not according to some scientists
Basic geological knowledge says different
Popular
Back to top


0







