Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us I think Our President is hinting at something. I can't think of what though | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: I think Our President is hinting at something. I can't think of what though

Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:15 pm to
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4495 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

American people deserve to know the truth, regardless of statutes of limitations. Vindication of those of us who have been called “election deniers,” and “conspiracy theorists,” for years now, even when it was blatantly obvious what happened… is important.


HEAR HEAR!!
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3770 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Of course there's none on treason... however.


Sedition (Seditious Conspiracy)

18 U.S.C. § 2384
5 years
From last overt act in conspiracy.

Election Tampering/Fraud

52 U.S.C. §§ 20511, 30145; 18 U.S.C. § 241
5 years
Applies to federal elections; state laws may differ for non-federal.

Abuse of Power/Hijacking Government

18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 2383, 371, 1031
5-7 years (generally 5)
Varies by specific charge; no limit if death involved.


Why did he wait that extra year instead of charging into this the minute he took office?
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
7686 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:28 pm to
That's one of my favorite gifs.
The fuller context of that, when you watch that episode, is downright hilarious.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3770 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

The frickery will be yuge later this year and in 2028. Democrats will not allow another conservative administration to postpone their plans.


yet they let Trump win in 2024?

327 level chess, I guess...
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3770 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

American people deserve to know the truth, regardless of statutes of limitations. Vindication of those of us who have been called “election deniers,” and “conspiracy theorists,” for years now, even when it was blatantly obvious what happened… is important. And attempting to make sure the uniparty cannot get away with this in the future is also important for the future of our nation.



What if they've been told the truth for 5 years and some of you just delude yourselves into believing it isn't the truth?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62575 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

American people deserve to know the truth, regardless of statutes of limitations.


You will find a good number of local attorney types who conflate/confuse a legal decision with truth.

The truth is what matters. Some of them think something like a SOL running means the act didn’t happen.
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 5:40 pm
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
5877 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:27 pm to
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
347 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:42 pm to
LOL…you think the court system would do that for Trump? The judicial is currently comprised of a bunch of Obama/Biden appointees and you cannot count on the “conservative” judges on the SC for any important vote in our favor. Lawyers almost universally hate Trump, and thats what judges are
Posted by Sizzle_DAWG
Sanford Stadium
Member since Jan 2024
2075 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:43 pm to
Doesn’t matter. As someone already posted, if it’s still proven that it was fraudulent it ultimately voids all laws/decisions the Biden administration enacted and has legal grounds to give Trump administration power to overturn everything without any courts standing in his way.

But I’ll believe it when I see it. I’m still doubtful Trump has the balls to do what needs to be done. This could all be a big show to amp up his base for the midterms.

I hope I’m wrong. We only have 3.5 years left to save our country from permanent third world, authoritarian status via the Marxist Democrats.
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 6:46 pm
Posted by hansenthered1
Dixie
Member since Nov 2023
2638 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:47 pm to
Awesome! You'll win the debate about the election in 2020 just as MAGA loses in 2026.

MAGAF are idiots.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
20913 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Is there a Statute of Limitations for treason, sedition, election-tampering, weaponizing powerful agencies and hijacking a certain North American gubmint apparatus?


Why would one leave out RICO?
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
4495 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Why would one leave out RICO?


The easiest way to take them all out in one fall swoop.



Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55193 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:58 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Cool, let's fricking cook then!!

But don't put out this vid and 3 years from now the nation is still racking up $2 trillion dollar deficits and the Bureaucratic State Skunks are still free and walking the streets of DC rather than being in a prison where they belong.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
7000 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Statute of limitations is going to make justice very hard to achieve.

NYC laughs at letting SoL get in your way.
Posted by Jesterea
Member since Nov 2011
1206 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 8:10 pm to
What I don’t get is them gaining control of the government and then letting Trump win. Why didn’t they just cheat again? Were they stupid?
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
4196 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

American people deserve to know the truth, regardless of statutes of limitations. Vindication of those of us who have been called “election deniers,” and “conspiracy theorists,” for years now, even when it was blatantly obvious what happened… is important.

sooo...lawfare
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12183 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

If proven that BIden wasn’t elected, the entire political apparatus implodes on itself.


Not to throw cold water on anyone, but the big thing is that voters in US do not directly elect the president.

Voters in the Electoral College vote on who becomes president. It is up to the states to send a electors for the Electoral College.

Also, the President of the Senate and House members then count the elector ballots. Now if two sets of electors are sent from a state, then it is up to Congress to invalidate both or select a set of electors to accept from a state. If neither candidate gets 270 after throwing out a set of questionable electors, the House then votes on a president which each state counting as one vote.

If something was fishy with the Georgia and Arizona vote counts, Congress should have grew a pair and invalidated those electors on Jan 6th. But with the Congress in the hands of the Democrats, this would not have done any good since Congress voted accept the electors from Georgia and Arizona.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram