- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Eastman officially disbarred
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:26 pm to Deplorableinohio
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:26 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
can’t wait for the payback to begin. Absolutely show no mercy.
100%
We need a national divorce in the worst way.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:30 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Just move to FL and alls well
Wrong!
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:08 pm to VOR
So he was convicted and sentenced?
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:12 pm to TigerB8
Eh, it's only CA. I don't get why, even from the bar's perspective. Guy offers up a legal theory, even if it is wrong, he should not be penalized
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:42 pm to udtiger
Once you realize they’re all on the same team, it will make sense to you
It’s not Dem vs. Rep; it’s Govt vs. Citizens
It’s not Dem vs. Rep; it’s Govt vs. Citizens
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:43 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Just move to FL and alls well
No it's not. You do not live in a utopia.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:46 pm to TigerB8
Dust this one off. It fits.
18 U.S.C. § 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.
Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.
The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.
Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.
MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS
18 U.S.C. § 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.
Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.
Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.
18 U.S.C. § 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.
Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.
The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.
Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.
MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS
18 U.S.C. § 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.
Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.
Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:47 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
. It fits.
Update: none of it fits
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:54 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
I can’t wait for the payback to begin. Absolutely show no mercy.
Wishful thinking.
You do know that nothing will ever happen, don't you?
I mean... has it EVER? Has the right EVER gotten payback and shown no mercy?
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:56 pm to VOR
quote:
VOR
Tell us again how you “argue with leftist” all the time and only on this board are you considered a leftist. I love a good fantasy
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:08 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
Dust this one off. It fits.
You send it to Halina Babba yet? You and her could wield this as a powerful sword against leftist lawfare. I can’t believe no one else has thought of it. Definitely bring it to Team Trump.
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:26 pm to Auburn1968
that depravation of rights under color of law is a useful tool that is incorporated into texas state law. I used it to rein in an out of control HOA president that was fricking with the rebuild of my house following a Hurricane wipe out. Texas DPS investigator showed up at his house and backed him out of the picture
Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Am I correct in interpreting your post as “Lol its bad they disbarred him for something I don’t think anyone should ever be disbarred for, in an effort to ruin a political opponent, but LOFL he didn’t come through on his stupid promise that he had damning evidence against the election thieves?”
Disbarring him for silly/stupid legal strategy is pretty bad, but his biggest issues are the unsubstantiated claims. Why is hiding the Kraken still seen as such a viable strategy? Revealing these crucial facts could have saved him.
And question..
What would it take for you to say, “fuuuuuck guys, this is actually getting a bit scary the lengths the left will go?”
Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:46 pm to TigerB8
Perhaps they shouldn’t break the law….lawyers, of all people, have no excuse. Did he represent himself?
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:00 pm to cadillacattack
10 years of campaigning on defunding and replacing ObamaCare.
What did we get?
This was presented as McCain's vendetta against Trump.
It was really an attack on America.
What did we get?
This was presented as McCain's vendetta against Trump.
It was really an attack on America.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:45 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
McCain was the epitome of the Republican party. Still remember how smug McCain was when he shite on each and everyone of his constituents.
The McCains of the gop are always hidden deep, and will only reveal their true selves when the gop is about to pass something Democrats hate.
The McCains of the gop are always hidden deep, and will only reveal their true selves when the gop is about to pass something Democrats hate.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:48 pm to TigerB8
The RINO and other limp wrist GOP pussies would be happy to just roll over. We have to fight these bastards and take it to them. Punch back 10x harder.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
SFP continues to run rear guard defense of lawfare.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 10:50 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
I don't get why, even from the bar's perspective.
You get why. But you’re scared of reality so you can’t admit it to yourself.
Popular
Back to top



1










