- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PANIC in DC: Pending EPA SCOTUS Ruling Edition
Posted on 6/28/22 at 3:31 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 6/28/22 at 3:31 pm to VoxDawg
Hey Jaybird Kuo
Here’s a newsflash
Congress lacks the power to delegate its rule making authority.
We gotta pass our laws in public Bubba, not by a
Bureaucrat who is trying to impress the oligarchy that he will eventually become a “policy advisor”
for . WTAF is wrong with that.
Here’s a newsflash
Congress lacks the power to delegate its rule making authority.
We gotta pass our laws in public Bubba, not by a
Bureaucrat who is trying to impress the oligarchy that he will eventually become a “policy advisor”
for . WTAF is wrong with that. 
1
Posted on 6/28/22 at 3:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Mate what's your prediction on how SCOTUS will rule on EPA?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 3:35 pm to The Maj
quote:
Yep, I wish someone would sue them over continuing resolutions and force them to pass a budget... No way CRs are constitutional...
As they say in Brooklyn and in the Irish Channel of New Orleans :
America Foist !!
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:26 pm to Champagne
Fox
One more blockbuster Supreme Court decision could still be coming even after Friday's abortion ruling
One more blockbuster Supreme Court decision could still be coming even after Friday's abortion ruling
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:58 pm to Kjnstkmn
Hey Barry, frick your pen and cell phone.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:08 pm to VoxDawg
The thought of the possible end of Chevron deference?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:12 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Hey Jaybird Kuo Here’s a newsflash Congress lacks the power to delegate its rule making authority. We gotta pass our laws in public Bubba, not by a Bureaucrat who is trying to impress the oligarchy that he will eventually become a “policy advisor” for . WTAF is wrong with that.
It’s just not fair because of that piece of shite Trump.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:12 pm to Clames
quote:
The thought of the possible end of Chevron deference?
it would be glorious but even if they ignore it like the did in Becerra case this term, I'd be happy.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:14 pm to Kjnstkmn
The administrative state is SO LARGE and been doing this for SO LONG it’ll be interesting to see IF the ruling is for the plaintiffs how it could set precedent for so many other agencies like this
Then, same at the stage levels. Time to move some of these asshats to the private sector and let them try and hack it on the other side of the table
Then, same at the stage levels. Time to move some of these asshats to the private sector and let them try and hack it on the other side of the table
Posted on 6/28/22 at 9:17 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
The Supreme Court is Trump’s poison pill for the Leftist goonery in this country.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:18 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
This is more important than the abortion decision, to me. I know that sentiment won't be shared.
The 4th Branch of Government has to be reined in, significantly.
Take the Abortion and the green new deal pieces out of these, I kind of see them as equal. They attack different major issues with 2 of the 3 brances of the govt. Dobbs turned the tide on SCOTUS making national law, and returning the rights back to the States. This EPA one will take powers away from agency's that have become political bully's, and puts things back where it should be...Congress and agencies apply their rules.
Now we need to figure out how to slow down the presidential EO process.
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 6/28/22 at 10:56 pm to KAGTASTIC
Would someone explain in layman's terms how the result of this upcoming decision may directly impact Chevron so much as to either invalidate it, nurture it, or neuter it.
I fully understand what Chevron is, but how does the EPA decision change Chevron? I'm legally stupid, ignorant, whatever, okay, but.. I understand how Chevron tips the scales, so to speak, in favor of the government. I assumed EPA was a chink in the armour, but it seems there are some here who see it as a barrel full of dynamite in the middle of the dam. Why?
I fully understand what Chevron is, but how does the EPA decision change Chevron? I'm legally stupid, ignorant, whatever, okay, but.. I understand how Chevron tips the scales, so to speak, in favor of the government. I assumed EPA was a chink in the armour, but it seems there are some here who see it as a barrel full of dynamite in the middle of the dam. Why?
Posted on 6/29/22 at 12:51 am to VoxDawg
Federalism is back baby.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 3:04 am to SirWinston
I’m nervous about this one. It’s going to take some serious balls to take on the alphabet soup state.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 3:36 am to VoxDawg
What a tasty little melt by the left.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 7:31 am to VoxDawg
Another cherished right may be reversed. The right to have a well regulated population may be a thing of the past.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 7:46 am to anc
quote:
If the court overturns Chevron, it should be a federal holiday. That 1984 case has done a lot to harm America. It has literally been used to defend government overreach for decades.
To be honest, I've never actually read Chevron. However, I've read cases that have used it to come to its decision.
Chevron "deference" should be limited STRICTLY to regulations and the like that INTERPRET a particular statute. And, it should basically be used in a case where the statute might not be totally clear and the agencies "interpretation" has 50/50 or greater probability of being the correct way to interpret the statute.
I do not believe that having a alphabet soup government agency used to actually MAKE LAWS and policy is either constitutional OR was how Chevron was ever meant to be interpreted. However, activist courts have used Chevron to justify the overreach of these agencies to implement political agendas that could never be passed as laws.
The Odumbf*ck administration put this overreach on steroids.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 7:51 am to MMauler
Will this effectively jettison tens of thousands of regulations made by govt agencies? Will this result in the loss of what some might call good regulations in the area of consumer protection or investment matters?
If so, I doubt this ruling goes in WV's favor or if it does it will be very narrow.
If so, I doubt this ruling goes in WV's favor or if it does it will be very narrow.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 7:56 am to Jake88
quote:
If so, I doubt this ruling goes in WV's favor or if it does it will be very narrow.
You are harshing my buzz, dude.
In all seriousness, you're probably right. I don't see SCOTUS actually doing something that has far reaching effects.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 7:59 am to UTMaverick
If Chief Justice Milquetoast didn't want to overturn Roe, I'd be very doubtful he'd allow this ruling, which could be more impactful to everyone, to upend decades of bureaucrat rule.
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News