Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us SFP explaining to us why Elon Musk is going to jail | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: SFP explaining to us why Elon Musk is going to jail

Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:59 pm to
Posted by DefCon1
Member since Dec 2017
785 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:59 pm to
They forgot that Trump can pardon Elon.
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
9934 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:59 pm to
THEY GOT HIM!!!!!1!1!1111!1!
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
89931 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:02 pm to
Legal Analysis presented by TikTok lol
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
40065 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:10 pm to
I was going to say she reminds me of Chrissie Hynde of the Pretenders
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15444 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:12 pm to
Jokes on them he would just buy the jail.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
48383 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

SFP explaining to us why Elon Musk is going to jail


That actually is Slow Mo Fo. He started transitioning on 11/6/24.
This post was edited on 2/8/25 at 7:54 pm
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32121 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

There is no such thing as “unauthorized” when you are hired by the Executive to perform a function at the executive branch


Jack Smith’s lawfare was ruled unconstitutional (as it should have been) because it came from DoJ/Executive branch if my memory serves me correctly.

Not disputing the validity of DOGE as it exists and used by Truman, Clinton, and Obama. Just that the executive has the ability to be overruled.
Posted by David Fellows
Chicago but Georgia on my mind
Member since Mar 2024
1578 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

all those laws she mentions makes me wonder how DOD has been getting away with using so many contractors for data processing all these years.


They were all elected. I remember voting for them.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
39953 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:57 pm to
Isn’t DOGE a rebranded Obama agency?


USDS - United States Digital Service
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34951 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Just that the executive has the ability to be overruled.


Not on such mundane issues as the ability to hire and direct IT staff.

Has the judiciary ever weighed in on low-level staffers and what their duties are allowed to be?

Or ANY hiring decisions beyond those requiring senate approval?

This should be a career-ending ruling.

Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
22052 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 5:11 pm to
She’s too dumb to insult.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5745 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 5:12 pm to
I can hear the sound of cockroaches scurrying across her floor and can smell the stench of cat shyt over burning incense sticks.
Posted by CrotchetyCowboy
Ward, AR
Member since Jul 2022
790 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 5:39 pm to
She is correct. She’s not a lawyer
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29589 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 5:54 pm to
AI.

You can see the micro-jumps in the video that do not occur with normal recordings.
Posted by JohnJuan
Member since Jan 2021
44 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Not even a month in and it’s already impeachment season.


Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24242 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

There is no such thing as “unauthorized” when you are hired by the Executive to perform a function at the executive branch.



Half the "suggestions" I make on here are made in jest.

However, this is one that might actually be worth contemplating.

Trump should issue everyone in DOGE an official letter (with a stamp and notary) on presidential letterhead authorizing the holder of such letter to have full access to all the alphabet agencies facilities and computer hardware "pursuant to the powers vested in the President of the United States."

Can't get any more “official authorization“ than that.
This post was edited on 2/9/25 at 5:24 am
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
17803 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 7:08 pm to
Who says any of this is unauthorized?
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
20446 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

how DOD has been getting away with using so many contractors for data processing all these years.

Easy. They were authorized by the proper DOD authority. DOGE is authorized by the president to do what they're doing.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
11573 posts
Posted on 2/8/25 at 10:20 pm to
What a dumb bitch.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram