- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The republican party should embrace gay marriage.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:40 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:40 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Gays can’t marry, no matter what the law calls it. As soon as two biological men or two biological women can pro-create without any outside “help” get back to me.
Since when did marriage = procreation? I have news for year, not every male and female that engages in vaginal intercourse wants to have a child.
1
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:40 am to Chaka
Chaka
Member since Aug 2022
14 posts
look you are new here - perhaps you are very young also.
You seem to be a person of good intentions - but be aware you are bringing up a topic which many of us who have been around the block a few times instantly realize as one of the early 'requests' which we - as normal people wanting everyone to enjoy their own lives as long as they leave us alone' - soon realized that others with absolutely evil intent were using people like you to destabilize the entire concept of productive civilization.
THEIR goal is not to make lives better for people like you - THEIR goal is to become the overlords of civilization itself, where THEY can sort people into 'groups' to get HOSTILITY between them over trivial and non-existent 'problems'.
They have preyed on OUR fundamental desire to help people out - to bend to reasonable requests, only to have repeatedly been stabbed in the back by those who pleaded for 'just a little 'acceptance' - we are tire of it - we are seeing the destructive effects we have 'allowed' to happen out of our generosity.
People like me - whose ONLY concern right now is how my 3 great grandchildren will be able to survive in the "bar scene from Star Wars future" being rammed down out throats. If any one of them wants to shack up with another guy - that is ok - but I want them to each have a chance to engage in things THEY want to do without the 'lords of the universe' telling them what they HAVE to do.
open your eyes - try to safeguard the future. Try to accomplish something more worthy of your existence other than where you enjoy "placing your d**k" - that is insulting to our intelligence and our good will.
Member since Aug 2022
14 posts
look you are new here - perhaps you are very young also.
You seem to be a person of good intentions - but be aware you are bringing up a topic which many of us who have been around the block a few times instantly realize as one of the early 'requests' which we - as normal people wanting everyone to enjoy their own lives as long as they leave us alone' - soon realized that others with absolutely evil intent were using people like you to destabilize the entire concept of productive civilization.
THEIR goal is not to make lives better for people like you - THEIR goal is to become the overlords of civilization itself, where THEY can sort people into 'groups' to get HOSTILITY between them over trivial and non-existent 'problems'.
They have preyed on OUR fundamental desire to help people out - to bend to reasonable requests, only to have repeatedly been stabbed in the back by those who pleaded for 'just a little 'acceptance' - we are tire of it - we are seeing the destructive effects we have 'allowed' to happen out of our generosity.
People like me - whose ONLY concern right now is how my 3 great grandchildren will be able to survive in the "bar scene from Star Wars future" being rammed down out throats. If any one of them wants to shack up with another guy - that is ok - but I want them to each have a chance to engage in things THEY want to do without the 'lords of the universe' telling them what they HAVE to do.
open your eyes - try to safeguard the future. Try to accomplish something more worthy of your existence other than where you enjoy "placing your d**k" - that is insulting to our intelligence and our good will.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:44 am to Chaka
Or just call for an end to government marriage licenses.
You shouldn’t need the states blessing to get married. No matter who you are.
You shouldn’t need the states blessing to get married. No matter who you are.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 5:45 am
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:52 am to Hayekian serf
quote:
Or just call for an end to government marriage licenses.
You shouldn’t need the states blessing to get married. No matter who you are.
Exactly. Same goes for divorce. You should be able to form and dissolve relationships as you see fit. None of the government's business.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 5:53 am to Chaka
quote:
Respect for Marriage Act
I love the way they name bills these days. You instantly know what it does by the name alone.
The trick is to think the opposite of what the words are telling you.
Works almost every time.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:00 am to Chaka
Shut up! 
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:24 am to Chaka
Let religious institutions handle marriage.
Governments need to stay out of it.
Governments need to stay out of it.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:27 am to Chaka
quote:So we should be ok with the federal government dictating what law a state can pass?
The party of small government should really stop caring about what consenting adults do between themselves
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:30 am to Tmo Sabe
quote:
Let religious institutions handle marriage.
Why do these modern non-traditional arrangements seek out validation from traditional systems that they reject?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:31 am to Chaka
quote:
The party of small government should really stop caring about what consenting adults do between themselves.
How the he'll is expanding government involvement in an institution small government ?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:33 am to Chaka
Individual states should make this decision.
Like for abortion.
Like for abortion.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:41 am to Chaka
We don’t care if you marry Simon. Go for it.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 6:45 am to Chaka
Here’s something that will blow your mind. Trump was the first president during his initial campaign to support gay marriage.
Stfu with the embrace stuff they already do. They don’t want to get rid of it. It’s legal
Stfu with the embrace stuff they already do. They don’t want to get rid of it. It’s legal
Posted on 11/16/22 at 7:23 am to Chaka
quote:
The party of small government should really stop caring about what consenting adults do between themselves.
quote:You contradict yourself here. They should be small govt and stay out of private lives by passing a law about private lives? The Court has ruled. The law is unnecessary and nothing but a political game.
Hopefully, they vote for the Respect for Marriage Act this week
And if this is the issue keeping you from voting republican there is something wrong with you. Think about what a picayune and settled matter you're putting before all of the other issues that impact your life.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 10:55 am to TrueTiger
quote:
validation
Because once the traditional system validates their filth, the system has invalidated itself. And that's the goal.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 11:03 am to Chaka
No. This is pathetic.
At what point does a Conservative Party actually conserve something? I refuse for an American Conservative Party to go the way of conservative parties in Europe and Canada.
Conservatives don’t need to openly campaign against it, but they need to combat it via policy.
This issue is solely unpopular due to media.
It’s all manufactured consent.
At what point does a Conservative Party actually conserve something? I refuse for an American Conservative Party to go the way of conservative parties in Europe and Canada.
Conservatives don’t need to openly campaign against it, but they need to combat it via policy.
This issue is solely unpopular due to media.
It’s all manufactured consent.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 11:11 am to Chaka
quote:
But what makes me just short of calling myself a republican is their opposition to gay marriage.
What's next...polygamy?
There is literally no moral difference between polygamy and homosexuality. The Bible certainly condemns homosexuality in much harsher language than it does plural marriages. Both are the acts of consenting adults who want to have their unions and their families recognized by law and having those protections.
Yet polygamy remains illegal in all 50 states.
How can gay marriage be constitutional but not polygamy?
I'm not for legalizing polygamy. There are other issues traditionally associated with polygamy...child marriage, welfare fraud, etc. But that's no justification for making the entire practice illegal. while recognizing gay marriage. At some point, polygamists may take to the courts and win.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 11:15 am to BamaGradinTn
Go get the conservative blacks, Hispanics and gays.
You have to grow the base. Conservatives should support stability in marriage.
You have to grow the base. Conservatives should support stability in marriage.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 11:16 am to finchmeister08
quote:Currently given federal protection under a SCOTUS ruling (Obergefell). This legislation would codify the protections statutorily, such that they would remain in place even if Obergefell is overturned.quote:Gay marriage is already legal. What makes this even more legal?
Respect for Marriage
Posted on 11/16/22 at 11:17 am to Tmo Sabe
quote:
Because once the traditional system validates their filth, the system has invalidated itself. And that's the goal.
Yes.
It's pretty much a vindictive way of making traditional people bend the knee.
Page 2 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News