Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us When Law Enforcement Intentionally Creates Justification For Shooting | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: When Law Enforcement Intentionally Creates Justification For Shooting

Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:32 pm to
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
9016 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

TX Tiger


Example 1: You do not hate leftists enough.
Posted by SpecialK_88
Member since Dec 2025
273 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

Get this propaganda out of here…


You say it's propaganda, but he was already going for his gun before the car started moving, instead of, you know, getting out of the way.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127260 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:39 pm to
It’s propaganda because it’s untrue. The source documents do not support the claims of the YouTuber that TxFager uncritically repeated here.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41223 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

he was already going for his gun before the car started moving


A LEO is taught to be prepared to defend against a potential impending attack.
Posted by GetMeOutOfHere
Member since Aug 2018
1089 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:46 pm to
Damn, how did he press the accelerator from outside the vehicle?

Is ICE offering telekinesis training to their officers? AND a sign up bonus?
Posted by SpecialK_88
Member since Dec 2025
273 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

A LEO is taught to be prepared to defend against a potential impending attack.


So, he thinks there could be an impending attack, but instead of stepping to the side where he would be safe, he decides to get his gun ready and stay in front of the car, and then try to claim self defense...

Prosecutor will have a field day with that one.

Also, a LEO is taught not to walk and stand right in front of a car. So there's that.
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 6:52 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27281 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

When Law Enforcement Intentionally Creates Justification For Shooting


So if they just stand in front of my car they can shoot me?

Or do I HAVE to drive my car at them in order for them to shoot me?
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35804 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:59 pm to
What’s next, “don’t place yourself in front of a perps gun barrel, if you get shot it’s your fault!”
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41223 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Prosecutor will have a field day with that one.


One doesn’t need a law degree to laugh at this nonsense:

She utilized her freedom to hit the accelerator in the direction of a LEO.

No prosecutor will be able to prove otherwise. His hand being ready to defend doesn’t prove otherwise.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16967 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:01 pm to
Oh well hell... if MR GLOBAL said so! I MUST rethink my entire stance on life! I been getting my propaganda from Mr Nation. I dumped Mr State when I found Mr Nation too. He seemed so trustworthy too.

Damn... Mr solar system could save us all now.

This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 7:04 pm
Posted by Mobile Patriot
Mobile
Member since Aug 2024
855 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:08 pm to
I think every local and federal police officer is well aware that using deadly force will seriously interrupt their lives. Not one of them "want" to do it unless there is no other choice. This poor ICE agent is now worried about his wife and kids safety. There is a cop in prison for killing a suspect that died of a drug overdose. No matter how gung ho you are, it's a last resort.
Posted by SpecialK_88
Member since Dec 2025
273 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

No prosecutor will be able to prove otherwise. His hand being ready to defend doesn’t prove otherwise.


Won't be able to prove otherwise? That doesn't make sense.

It's very simple, LEO is meant to defuse a situation, it comes with the Job. Standing in front of a car and getting your gun ready instead of de-escalating the situation by getting out from right in front of the car will easily be used against him.

So will all of the freeze frames showing the moment the first shot was fired, he was no longer in front of the car. (This is a big one)

Everyone here is so hung up about him getting nudged by the car, that doesn't mean he gets to shoot after he's no longer in front of the car and claim self defense.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41223 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Won't be able to prove otherwise? That doesn't make sense.


They would need to prove the dumb lady did NOT accelerate in the direction of a LEO to have a case.

Getting his gun ready in case the perpetrator makes a dumb move is irrelevant to that point.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
19091 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:12 pm to
If you think about it, it’s literally a skit Dave Chappelle or Shane Gillis would come up with.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13292 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

You say it's propaganda, but he was already going for his gun before the car started moving, instead of, you know, getting out of the way.


He had already been run over by another whacko. An officer can draw his weapon to protect himself.

I bet you make excuses for illegal immigrants who rape and murder, too. Probably say that those girls had it coming.
Posted by Csmims
A sandy beach in paradise
Member since Jan 2019
3743 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:16 pm to
What a waste of good air.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108484 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:16 pm to
You’re a POS Hack. Lol
Posted by SpecialK_88
Member since Dec 2025
273 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

He had already been run over by another whacko. An officer can draw his weapon to protect himself.


An officer can draw a weapon to protect himself when there's no other option. They are held to an even higher standard than normal citizens. He also didn't actually shoot the gun until he was no longer in front of the car. Case is closed right there, what the car was doing no longer matters as it's no longer self defense.

Also, sounds like this guy isn't too bright if he didn't learn his lesson about standing in front of potential whacko's car the first time.

None of you guys are helping his case.

This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 7:23 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41223 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

He also didn't actually shoot the gun until he was no longer in front of the car.


As soon as she hit the accelerator, and then hit him, the cop was allowed to defend himself until the threat was neutralized.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
54908 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

Something is seriously wrong with you


Well, he is a Democratic Socialist.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram