- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You think Derek wins an appeal?
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:52 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:52 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
1. No change of venue
2. Mad Maxine's comments
3. China Joe's comments
Defense witness’ former home being vandalized after testifying and certain journalists attempting to dox jurors....pretty much jury intimidation
0
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:53 pm to ninthward
quote:Biden is not a particularly intelligent individual, and this statement provides good evidence in support of that assertion, but "how did it affect the verdict?" Did a juror hear him?
The president telling the world he hopes for the right verdict. Maybe start there Matlock?
If not, it has no bearing on the case whatsoever. Same with Mensa Waters.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:54 pm to ninthward
quote:
The president telling the world he hopes for the right verdict. Maybe start there Matlock?
Along with congresswomen engaging a mob to "get confrontational" if their preferred verdict wasn't handed down. The constant reporting on the jury and minor details about each juror being leaked to the public.
The fact that the trial was held in the city of Minneapolis where the mayor openly cheered for a guilty verdict and a large mob awaited to tear apart the city if a guilty verdict wasn't handed down.
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 4/20/21 at 6:58 pm to texashorn
quote:
An appeal of what? What was the procedural defect?
Probably the thousands of pieces of evidence the prosecution didn’t disclose prior to the start of the trial. That’s the starting point for an appeal beyond the theatrics.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 7:10 pm to PeepNCroom
quote:
You think Derek wins an appeal?
he is 100% fricked
doesnt matter how much evidence there is, just like with trump, the courts will admit its was rigged but refuse to overturn it because they cant upset the iwant brigades
Posted on 4/20/21 at 7:11 pm to ninthward
quote:
Maybe start there Matlock
Posted on 4/20/21 at 7:11 pm to PeepNCroom
Should he get a new trial yes, will he no
No one wants to touch this with a ten foot pole. Everyone will pass the buck and the USSC will punt as well
What’s one life to appease the masses.
No one wants to touch this with a ten foot pole. Everyone will pass the buck and the USSC will punt as well
What’s one life to appease the masses.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:02 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
What’s one life to appease the masses.
The irony is that this is exactly what happened in the south before the vast majority of us were ever born that led to the Civil rights movement in the first place.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:10 pm to PeepNCroom
He has zero shot at an appeal. When you have the POTUS and VPOTUS on TV after a verdict saying it was the right thing there is no way no how he will ever get a fair shot at any hearing for all time. His life is over.
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:12 pm to texashorn
quote:
An appeal of what? What was the procedural defect?
CBS News threatening the jury and Waters threatening violence
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:13 pm to PeepNCroom
quote:
You think Derek wins an appeal?
The injustice system wouldn't touch our election, you think they want any part of Floyd? Hell no!
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:13 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/17/21 at 9:44 am
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:26 pm to PeepNCroom
Hopefully...will be awesome!
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:44 pm to PeepNCroom
he has about a zero percent chance of that happening
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:48 pm to PeepNCroom
I think there are very reasonable grounds around:
1. Denying the change of venue
2. Allowing all of the emotional, non-probative testimony
3. The lack of sequestration
4. The public tampering by federal officials
Practically, I do not think any judge is willing literally to risk his life for justice. The media already is doxxing a paramedic in Utah for donating $10 to Kyle Rittenhouse, and did you see what the mob did to the defense expert's former home? Do you know a judge with the balls the fairly review the appeal? I would argue they will threaten and doxx any attorney who even agrees to represent Chauvin on appeal.
I would love of Alan Dershowitz would do it pro bono. That is a great attorney and a man of principles (at least politically, TBD on Epstein).
1. Denying the change of venue
2. Allowing all of the emotional, non-probative testimony
3. The lack of sequestration
4. The public tampering by federal officials
Practically, I do not think any judge is willing literally to risk his life for justice. The media already is doxxing a paramedic in Utah for donating $10 to Kyle Rittenhouse, and did you see what the mob did to the defense expert's former home? Do you know a judge with the balls the fairly review the appeal? I would argue they will threaten and doxx any attorney who even agrees to represent Chauvin on appeal.
I would love of Alan Dershowitz would do it pro bono. That is a great attorney and a man of principles (at least politically, TBD on Epstein).
Posted on 4/20/21 at 8:49 pm to Pelican fan99
SCOTUS "Muh. No standing."
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News