- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mark Kelly has filed a law suit against Pete Hegseth
Posted on 1/12/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 1/12/26 at 12:51 pm
18
Posted on 1/12/26 at 12:53 pm to hawgfaninc
He is just digging himself in a deeper hole. He needs to take his losses like a man and move on
Posted on 1/12/26 at 12:54 pm to hawgfaninc
Now THIS will be a fun lawsuit.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 12:54 pm to hawgfaninc
I would do the same thing, not that it will help Mrs. Kelly.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 12:55 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Discovery
Posted on 1/12/26 at 12:56 pm to hawgfaninc
Kelly was a real tough guy until they tried to hit his pocketbook. 
This whole movement by the left to try and masculinize their male candidates is hilariously misguided.
My favorite is Mayor Pete wearing a permanent beard now
This whole movement by the left to try and masculinize their male candidates is hilariously misguided.
My favorite is Mayor Pete wearing a permanent beard now
Posted on 1/12/26 at 1:02 pm to hawgfaninc
Saw a guy Saturday near the Sports Book in the Cirque during the playoffs that I swear was him, but this dude was a few years younger and not quite as Gollum-looking.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 1:07 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Discovery
Please preserve any and all communications related to the production of your public service announcement video.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 1:22 pm to hawgfaninc
Free publicity for Kelly and he feels it makes him look like a fighter/martyr to his constituents by standing up to the government despite his extremely harmful activity.
Remember, this is the same guy who has no problem taking away an inalienable right from the entire US citizenry due to his very own personal issue.
Selfish SOB!!
Remember, this is the same guy who has no problem taking away an inalienable right from the entire US citizenry due to his very own personal issue.
Selfish SOB!!
Posted on 1/12/26 at 1:41 pm to Timeoday
Expedite the calling into service and subsequent court martial.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 1:44 pm to hawgfaninc
Would this not have to be fought in military court?
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:00 pm to hawgfaninc
Sorry, Sir, you’re gonna take this UCMJ hammering first before you lose the civil case.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:01 pm to hawgfaninc
Good. That will require discovery.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:08 pm to hawgfaninc
Yep, this is not surprising.
Anyone who believes they are innocent has to take action in this case… Given the circumstances.
Personal opinion of this situation makes no difference. It could end up being an important case.
Anyone who believes they are innocent has to take action in this case… Given the circumstances.
Personal opinion of this situation makes no difference. It could end up being an important case.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:08 pm to hawgfaninc
Every legal everything knows there is no case against Kelly. Which is why Hegseth is trying to do everything administratively. It isn't even NJP, pretty sure you can't take a retiree to NJP, and even if you could the UCMJ is pretty specific about NJP punishments - retirement benefits isn't one of them.
Tat-boy isn't going to win, but he'll keep his bros (you all) happy with the effort, then will blame the courts for hating America when he loses. Don't worry tho, no one will stop Pete from murdering survivors floating in the ocean, because war isn't murder.
Tat-boy isn't going to win, but he'll keep his bros (you all) happy with the effort, then will blame the courts for hating America when he loses. Don't worry tho, no one will stop Pete from murdering survivors floating in the ocean, because war isn't murder.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:09 pm to PonchaTiger
You go big guy all those hard hitting posts!
Brilliant!
Brilliant!
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:14 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
"Now, Pete Hegseth wants our longest-serving military veterans to live with the constant threat that they could be deprived of their rank and pay years or even decades after they leave the military just because he or another Secretary of Defense doesn’t like what they’ve said," he added. "That’s not the way things work in the United States of America, and I won’t stand for it."
Jeez what a toad.
This is similar to the Minneapolis ICE shooting. Don't want a problem? Don't go looking for a problem. I have plenty of veteran friends and they fully understand the difference between SecWar not liking what they say and encouraging serious misconduct and seditious behavior.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:21 pm to tadman
Agreed. Kelly deserves his pension for his service. He put in the time.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:28 pm to The Pirate King
quote:Looks to me like he has not backed-down by one iota and that he is counter-punching.
Kelly was a real tough guy until they tried to hit his pocketbook.
What a coward.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 2:42 pm to Auburn80
quote:
Kelly deserves his pension for his service. He put in the time.
Well, that depends, doesn't it?
If someone is guilty of making seditious statements it doesn't matter how much time they put in, I would think they could be stripped of benefits they otherwise would retain in good standing. I doubt you retain your pension if you are court marshaled, for example, even of you have 50 years in.
On the other hand, if the court rules that the statements don't rise to the level of sedition, then Hegseth is guilty of textbook retaliation violations of the 1st Amendment.
So the amount of time Kelly has in is not the factor. Whether those remarks are considered seditious is the operative factor.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News