- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Premise Iran wants to Nuke Israel and the US!
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:47 am
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:47 am
People who oppose the US and Israel's actions against Iran must not believe that Iran would use a NUKE if they had one. Facts are that by Iran's own admission they had enough enriched uranium to make 10 nuclear bombs. By the ICBM attack on Diego Garcia they had the range to reach Europe. If left unimpeded they would have the capability to Nuke the target of choice within a 2K mile range. So what other option do these people who oppose US involvement offer to resolve the problem. I am trying to understand the opposing position but I just do not understand. Of course TDS factors into some of this.
18
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:53 am to TigerPlate
They have been two weeks away from a nuke for twenty years. It was and still is propaganda. Why does Israel get nuclear weapons? Are we prepared to put boots on the ground in North Korea?
We supposedly devastated their nuclear capabilities months ago but now we need a full scale war?
Now the new propaganda is they are speed racing to a nuke and we need to put boots on the ground to stop them. (Per Ben Shapiro)
None of this was worth it and none of it will be worth it. All of it was propaganda to strengthen Israel's position in the region.
We supposedly devastated their nuclear capabilities months ago but now we need a full scale war?
Now the new propaganda is they are speed racing to a nuke and we need to put boots on the ground to stop them. (Per Ben Shapiro)
None of this was worth it and none of it will be worth it. All of it was propaganda to strengthen Israel's position in the region.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:54 am to msutiger
Are you really this retarded?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:00 am to TigerPlate
quote:
People who oppose the US and Israel's actions against Iran must not believe that Iran would use a NUKE if they had one. Facts are that by Iran's own admission they had enough enriched uranium to make 10 nuclear bombs. By the ICBM attack on Diego Garcia they had the range to reach Europe. If left unimpeded they would have the capability to Nuke the target of choice within a 2K mile range. So what other option do these people who oppose US involvement offer to resolve the problem. I am trying to understand the opposing position but I just do not understand. Of course TDS factors into some of this.
Ok, Mark Levin
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:00 am to msutiger
quote:
Why does Israel get nuclear weapons?
Has Israel's stated purpose for decades been to wipe all mooslums out of existence?
Has Israel sponsored terrorism for decades?
Israel has not proven itself to be a fanatical death cult that kills its own citizens for protesting in the streets.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:01 am to LSUnation78
quote:
Are you really this retarded?
Netanyahu has been begging for this war for 30 years
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:01 am to msutiger
quote:
They have been two weeks away from a nuke for twenty years. It was and still is propaganda. Why does Israel get nuclear weapons? Are we prepared to put boots on the ground in North Korea?
Holy shite you are dumb
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:03 am to msutiger
quote:Propaganda by whom?
It was and still is propaganda.
The Iranian delegation claimed it had enough fissile material to build 11 nuclear bombs. That was their claim.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:07 am to msutiger
You seem to lack understanding of what it means when they say Iran is X months away from a nuclear weapon. It refers to how long it would take if they made a decision to go for it. Not a design or technical capability that is two weeks away from being done.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:09 am to msutiger
quote:
They have been two weeks away from a nuke for twenty years
This was a bad talking point and should have never been said. But the possibility exists that there was incomplete intelligence during that timeframe which lead to that belief. Either way, it should have never been stated in that manner.
quote:
Why does Israel get nuclear weapons?
They more or less stole the technology. From us.
quote:
Are we prepared to put boots on the ground in North Korea?
No. They already have a nuke. And a crazy leader calling the shots. And presumably their ability to use their nukes are limited. They seem just as likely to have that think blow up on the pad than in enemy territory.
quote:
We supposedly devastated their nuclear capabilities months ago but now we need a full scale war?
Their capabilities, yes. The material they already produced? It's still out there. And supposedly it takes about two weeks to get it up to 90% enriched. Centrifuges are not very big. Seems pretty easy to acquire more of them or to build more of them. They do have the technology.
quote:
Now the new propaganda is they are speed racing to a nuke and we need to put boots on the ground to stop them.
A dirty bomb, at best, IMO.
quote:
None of this was worth it and none of it will be worth it. All of it was propaganda to strengthen Israel's position in the region.
I guess we will see when it's all over. Maybe you'll be right. But for now you dont know jack schitt.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:09 am to TigerPlate
Israel has no qualms of ultimately using nuclear weapons against Iran if all other options are ineffective. We know* that Israel has nuclear weapons. We also know* that Iran does not at this time.
Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty and at least on record saying they will not develop. The same cannot be said of Israel.
Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty and at least on record saying they will not develop. The same cannot be said of Israel.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:10 am to msutiger
Iran has been doing that for 47 years so maybe that’s why Israel did
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:12 am to LSUnation78
quote:
LSUnation78
Are you a retarded NPC?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:13 am to TigerPlate
Anyone who thinks Iran would actually nuke the US or Israel is an absolute fricking retard
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:16 am to msutiger
quote:
Why does Israel get nuclear weapons?
Because we said so. Are you a globalist?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:18 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Anyone who thinks Iran would actually nuke the US or Israel is an absolute fricking retard
Sooo..... you are calling the Iranians retards.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:23 am to msutiger
So you think they weren't getting nukes are they would not use them on us if they did?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:26 am to TigerPlate
The error in thinking comes from assuming the IRGC cares about their own lives or the lives of their own people in the slightest compared to their irrational zealous devotion to their blood cult and desire to wipe out Jews and Christians for their god.
Because of course, their god can’t wipe out his own creation without the help from the Islamic nutballs.
You aren’t dealing with rational people here, not in the slightest. They’re radicals in the strongest definition of radical possible.
Because of course, their god can’t wipe out his own creation without the help from the Islamic nutballs.
You aren’t dealing with rational people here, not in the slightest. They’re radicals in the strongest definition of radical possible.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:28 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Has Israel's stated purpose for decades been to wipe all mooslums out of existence?
Yes
quote:
Has Israel sponsored terrorism for decades?
Yes, absolutely.
quote:
Israel has not proven itself to be a fanatical death cult that kills its own citizens for protesting in the streets.
Not exactly but yes.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:29 am to TigerPlate
Why would Iran use a nuclear weapon?
What would happen if Iran used a nuclear weapon?
The people who run Iran are not in a suicidal death cult. They are like politicians here hungry for money and power. Getting more money and maintaining power.
"Death to America" is a political slogan. America is an international boogeyman for them. Do you listen to some of the shite politicians say here?
Iran is the leading state sponsor of terrorism. They are a major pain in the arse but not a threat to the United States.
A nuclear weapon would provide the regime with a security blanket. The same blanket North Korea has along with Pakistan and India.
So how do we manage Iran. The answer is the same way we have for decades. It's obvious we have outstanding intelligence and have the power to reign them in as necessary.
But even if someday they developed a bomb the world would adapt and adjust. It's not something we want to happen of course but we would manage it just fine.
Saying Iran can never have a nuclear bomb puts the United States in a box, not the Iranians.
How many more dead Americans do we need in the global shithole known as the middle east?
Do you honestly think the next regime even if there were one is going to be any better? Do you seriously believe that? Why would you believe that?
We are negotiating with the current regime to end the war. Do you think they will now somehow start to play by the rules?
On the contrary, they will continue to desperately try to obtain a nuclear weapon because they think it would provide them the means to stay in control. Not to launch it against the United States.
Read some books. Stop swallowing propaganda.
What would happen if Iran used a nuclear weapon?
The people who run Iran are not in a suicidal death cult. They are like politicians here hungry for money and power. Getting more money and maintaining power.
"Death to America" is a political slogan. America is an international boogeyman for them. Do you listen to some of the shite politicians say here?
Iran is the leading state sponsor of terrorism. They are a major pain in the arse but not a threat to the United States.
A nuclear weapon would provide the regime with a security blanket. The same blanket North Korea has along with Pakistan and India.
So how do we manage Iran. The answer is the same way we have for decades. It's obvious we have outstanding intelligence and have the power to reign them in as necessary.
But even if someday they developed a bomb the world would adapt and adjust. It's not something we want to happen of course but we would manage it just fine.
Saying Iran can never have a nuclear bomb puts the United States in a box, not the Iranians.
How many more dead Americans do we need in the global shithole known as the middle east?
Do you honestly think the next regime even if there were one is going to be any better? Do you seriously believe that? Why would you believe that?
We are negotiating with the current regime to end the war. Do you think they will now somehow start to play by the rules?
On the contrary, they will continue to desperately try to obtain a nuclear weapon because they think it would provide them the means to stay in control. Not to launch it against the United States.
Read some books. Stop swallowing propaganda.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News