- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Princewill update from Ole Miss poster Quicksilver
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:26 pm to Bundick71
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:26 pm to Bundick71
quote:
A buyout should only be triggered if he would actually try to sign elsewhere. It has nothing to do with him going in the portal. he doesn’t have to sign elsewhere just bc he goes into the portal.
the Lisfranc experts have turned into contract experts now
1
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:27 pm to Lester Earl
Well, actually, he’s correct
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:29 pm to Robcrzy
quote:
Have Todd Graves send 300k in caniac combos
I don’t think 50 caniac combos gets the job done.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:34 pm to tigerskin
quote:
It can't come from a booster but has to come out of their rev share pool which may or may not be tied up in other contracts."
That’s not what was reported during the UW-Williams saga. They said the hit came against NEXT YEAR’S Rev Share pool, which would indicate that anyone could pay it now.
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:19 pm to tigerskin
Money is money you pieces of shite. It shouldn’t matter how or where it’s paid from. Just take the money and stop holding the man hostage.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:08 pm to tigerskin
quote:
can't come from a booster but has to come out of their rev share pool
Money is money, booboo.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:14 pm to tigerskin
Can a player threaten to give no effort if they don't let him go?
And can they still be required to pay him then? Not a full out hold out, but basically the minimum to still get paid.
And at that point do you still keep him? I realize it's college and a player isn't likely to purposely tank his own draft stock, but I still wonder what would happen with paying a guy who doesn't want to be there and threatens to do nothing.
Especially if they are paying him a lot.
It's wild times.
And can they still be required to pay him then? Not a full out hold out, but basically the minimum to still get paid.
And at that point do you still keep him? I realize it's college and a player isn't likely to purposely tank his own draft stock, but I still wonder what would happen with paying a guy who doesn't want to be there and threatens to do nothing.
Especially if they are paying him a lot. It's wild times.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:23 pm to beauchristopher
quote:
Can a player threaten to give no effort if they don't let him go?
And can they still be required to pay him then? Not a full out hold out, but basically the minimum to still get paid.
And at that point do you still keep him? I realize it's college and a player isn't likely to purposely tank his own draft stock, but I still wonder what would happen with paying a guy who doesn't want to be there and threatens to do nothing. Especially if they are paying him a lot.
It's wild times.
They have to let him enter the portal if he submitted his intention to them by 11:59 PM CST on 01/16/2025. They're mandated by the NCAA to do it. His name will officially hit the portal to be contacted Monday or Tuesday due to deadline falling on a weekend. Everything else you're seeing/hearing out of Oxford or from its fan base is nothing more than nonsense.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:34 pm to Ellis_Hugh
quote:
OM is screwing that dude hard.
All these questionable actions by OM will haunt them for years to come. Let this get out how they treat their star athletes and their administration loses all respect.
OM in deep trouble….
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:50 pm to tigerskin
i feel like a provision that requires money from a certain fund to pay a buyout isn’t enforceable and would be knocked down by a court.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:52 pm to Bedtiger
OM is so desperate it is embarrassing. This proves to me that they know they aren't shite without CLK.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 9:55 pm to tigerskin
Tupelo is desperate
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:05 pm to WhoDatNC
quote:
OM is so desperate it is embarrassing. This proves to me that they know they aren't shite without CLK.
Well… of course. Put yourself in their shoes. They’ve always been garbage and for once they had a coach who was already elite coaching at a program well below his stature. Now, they know, that they have no chance and are back to celebrating 7 wins, which is their historical ceiling.
It’s probably incredibly hard to accept, I kind of feel bad.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 10:07 pm to Former_5_Star
I don't. They didn't need Kiffen remember? Frk them.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 12:53 am to tigerskin
We have spent in excess of $40 million on this class and thats before someone like Prince or Seaton. I’d have to think our revenue share has to be close to that $20.5 million limit. Being honest I think we only can take one of those guys and while Seaton is no doubt the bigger get because of the position he plays, I think we get Prince and he’s the opening game starter at DE opposite of Gabe Reliford. Not a bad consolation prize.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 2:05 am to LSUPilot07
So they really just didn’t let this kid leave against his will?
Psychos
Psychos
Posted on 1/18/26 at 2:15 am to LSUPilot07
quote:
We have spent in excess of $40 million on this class and thats before someone like Prince or Seaton. I’d have to think our revenue share has to be close to that $20.5 million limit. Being honest I think we only can take one of those guys and while Seaton is no doubt the bigger get because of the position he plays, I think we get Prince and he’s the opening game starter at DE opposite of Gabe Reliford. Not a bad consolation prize.
no we have not. We will sign Seaton also. Money is not an issue. It all depends if Seaton wants in or not
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:16 am to LSUPilot07
Well apparently last off-season LSU had the money w collective and nil and didn't have to use last years rev share payment when Many teams did.. ideally they want to stay ahead and not have to "backload' contracts.. basically sign now paid n July.. So they have the money to go get a game wrecker.. or a probable All American LT.. Bec those two players are game changers.. 10-2 is going to be extremely tough w Next season schedule.. pay those two men!
This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 3:17 am
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:56 am to DeathvalleyU
quote:
Couldn’t he unenroll and enroll at LSU? Wouldn’t that allow them to give him extra NIL on his contract to pay the buyout? That way it technically is paid by him and not LSU.
I’m pretty sure, regardless of who pays it, it comes off of next season’s rev share cap. If that is correct, there’s plenty time to work around it.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:59 am to GeauxldMember
We have an outside NIL collective that does not apply to the cap. It’s one reason we landed Kiffin.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News