- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jacques Doucet Just Posted This on X
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:57 pm to BottomlandBrew
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:57 pm to BottomlandBrew
I wouldn’t really think it was anything he did but something they could find to site the clause. It could be something as simple as the lawsuit from the Gregg Brooks family. I’m sure Lsu has done their internal investigations.
0
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:58 pm to jmon
quote:
Lawyers love it,
Litigators maybe.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:00 pm to DByrd2
It was deleted because it was inaccurate. There is a lot of misdirection going on, which is a good thing in my opinion. Get people chasing their tails while they go conduct business and get a new coach.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:00 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The most lsu thing ever to come out of this would be LSU owe Kelly more than the original buyout because Governor Aligator Hunter leaked false info about Kelly out there and then he wins a defamation case to go on top of his buyout
He'd have to sue Landry directly, not LSU.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:00 pm to HangingWithMrCooper
No one knows why it was deleted.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:00 pm to HangingWithMrCooper
quote:
There is a lot of misdirection going on, which is a good thing in my opinion. Get people chasing their tails while they go conduct business and get a new coach.
I actually agree with this 100%.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:04 pm to DByrd2
What's crazy is that we are all giving a sigh of relief that it's not $54M, ...yet it's still an absurd $27M.
If $27M is reasonable now, then Lanning's $20M buyout is a straight up bargain.
If $27M is reasonable now, then Lanning's $20M buyout is a straight up bargain.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:06 pm to GeauxFish31
LSU not having the full buyout money disproves a lot of narratives.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:08 pm to mdomingue
The very reason that Kelly would agree to renegotiate is to keep the information that they’re siting private.
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:08 pm to The Baker
quote:
Maybe the drinking issue creeping up on him would be the most logical explanation
We have a winner. And the buyout is at 27 million. I told y'all LSU wouldn't fire time unless the buyout was less than 30 million.
I thought that meant in two years, but here we are.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:08 pm to fastlane
The name is pretty easy to find
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:08 pm to DByrd2
quote:
Kelly's buyout was negotiated down to $27 million, about half of what he was owed. This was done through the violation of morality clauses in his contract.
If this is true, why does LSU owe him anything?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:09 pm to LSUFreek
If the report is accurate, and the buyout was negotiated to a 27 million lump sum payment, it is actually mutually beneficial. Kelly gets his money upfront that he can invest however he wants and potentially turn it into 40 million or more. It probably also then would not be tied to his future employment. For LSU they get to reduce the large buyout number and be done with Kelly forever.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:09 pm to Mo Jeaux
Kelly could have easily said give me half in a lump sum and remove offset language based on other employment.
If he gets hired now and gets $6 or $7 million per year, he actually get more money this way.
It helps LSU pay a known amount and then if he doesn’t take a year off, saves them money that no offset for a year lost.
It’s a win-win for both parties.
If he gets hired now and gets $6 or $7 million per year, he actually get more money this way.
It helps LSU pay a known amount and then if he doesn’t take a year off, saves them money that no offset for a year lost.
It’s a win-win for both parties.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:10 pm to reauxl tigers
Looks like it was taken down.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:11 pm to Geauxgurt
Also, by firing Kelly first, it reduces the buyout for the assistants to at most 6 months from the date he was fired. 
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:12 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
He was at the time of hire. Not so much after.
the depression of living in Louisiana will make you do some immoral things
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:16 pm to HangingWithMrCooper
quote:
It was deleted because it was inaccurate. There is a lot of misdirection going on, which is a good thing in my opinion. Get people chasing their tails while they go conduct business and get a new coach.
Moscona mentioned morality as well. It’s probably accurate
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:17 pm to DByrd2
If there was violation of the morality clause, LSU powers that be, didn't just found out about this Sunday morning. They had to have known about it.
So, if LSU was still ranked No. 3 and heading to the playoffs, the moral violation wouldn't be an issue? That would be slimy as hell on LSU part.
And...I'm glad Kelly is gone, but put the facts out there and let the chips fall where they may, on both sides.
So, if LSU was still ranked No. 3 and heading to the playoffs, the moral violation wouldn't be an issue? That would be slimy as hell on LSU part.
And...I'm glad Kelly is gone, but put the facts out there and let the chips fall where they may, on both sides.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:18 pm to bdavids09
quote:
Moscona mentioned morality as well. It’s probably accurate
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News