- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal court halts bulk of tariffs
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:20 pm to TigersHuskers
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:20 pm to TigersHuskers
quote:
This is judicial overreach.
Please read Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution
0
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:20 pm to TigersHuskers
Oh, I'm even worse than a boomer. I'm a millenial.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:26 pm to BottomlandBrew
This is even better. It was a 3-0 decision, and this is who appointed the judges:
quote:
The judges on the Manhattan panel were each appointed by a different president. Judge Jane Restani was appointed to the US Court of International Trade by President Ronald Reagan. Judge Gary Katzmann was appointed to the court by President Barack Obama. Judge Timothy Reif was appointed by President Trump.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 9:16 pm to TigersHuskers
quote:
some of us still do and want us to have strong trade deals.
Without using Grok, what should be included in a strong trade deal?
I've asked this like 6 times whenever people say trump is making deals and no one ever gives an answer.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 9:37 pm to TigersHuskers
quote:Lmfao. You're an imbecile.
This is judicial overreach. Tired as frick of you boomer fricks whining about DJT.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 9:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Trump could cap health insurance company profits and the courts would strike it down.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 11:13 pm to jcaz
quote:
Trump could cap health insurance company profits and the courts would strike it down.
Yes? Why wouldn’t they?
Posted on 5/28/25 at 11:21 pm to LChama
quote:
Is that why futures rocketed?
While I was not anti tariff, this is further proof the markets prefer our government to be gridlocked. It is understandable, when the government cannot get stuff done, the people get done what they need to get done.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 11:27 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
when the government cannot get stuff done, the people get done what they need to get done.
This is the way
Posted on 5/29/25 at 5:52 am to jcaz
Yes silly - because he doesn’t have the constitutional authority to do that without congress. He’s not a dictator
This post was edited on 5/29/25 at 6:06 am
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:41 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:Elimination of restrictions, subsidies, and tariffs albeit with compensatory actions for years of damage.
Without using Grok, what should be included in a strong trade deal?
Posted on 5/29/25 at 9:50 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Elimination of restrictions, subsidies, and tariffs albeit with compensatory actions for years of damage.
Jesus Christ this is unhinged. Think about what you’re actually asking other countries to do.
You want reparations because we bought shite.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 10:59 am to TigersHuskers
quote:
I realize guys like you dont give a frick about America but some of us still do and want us to have strong trade deals.
But seriously if you want strong and lasting trade deals, call your congressman.
“The declaration of a national emergency is not a talisman enabling the President to rewrite the tariff schedules.”
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:03 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
it appears that investors like the tariffs cause the Market is shite right now
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:08 am to Robcrzy
Lots of items have already increased in price due to tariffs. They won't be going back down even if tariffs stay blocked.
So we get tariff price increases without the tariffs too.
What a shiteshow this whole thing has been.
So we get tariff price increases without the tariffs too.
What a shiteshow this whole thing has been.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:14 am to Robcrzy
quote:What?
it appears that investors like the tariffs cause the Market is shite right now
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:19 am to NC_Tigah
I always like the years of damage argument because the US has absolutely buttfricked the rest of the world when it comes to economic growth over the last 50 years.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:31 am to Robcrzy
quote:
it appears that investors like the tariffs cause the Market is shite right now
The market pretty quickly realized this decision just adds to the uncertainty and timing of any tariffs and deals. Deals will likely get slow played now and tariffs are still coming, just under different sections now.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:57 pm to Hateradedrink
quote:"NC" is fine. I don't have the walking on water thing down yet.
Jesus Christ
quote:No.
You want reparations because we bought shite.
The concept would be redress for years of bad faith actions by certain partners. E.g., BYD subsidies being presently used to price Tesla out of the Chinese market, after stealing Tesla tech and assembly processes there.
Given that dynamic, obviously willy nilly free access for BYD to US markets with elimination of restrictions, subsidies, and tariffs would not be appropriate.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 2:03 pm to ned nederlander
quote:But I am honestly confused about what authorities POTUS does and does not have.
“The declaration of a national emergency is not a talisman enabling the President to rewrite the tariff schedules.”
When Biden increased Trump's steel tariffs, it seems to have been purely executive.
LINK
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News