Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us 164 years ago today: "No terms but unconditional and immediate surrender can be accepted." | Page 6 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: 164 years ago today: "No terms but unconditional and immediate surrender can be accepted."

Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
10418 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Glad you like the overbearing Federal Government, because I for one despise it.

I bet you boycott the NFL and tell everyone on Facebook about it


You would be wrong, but how did you surmise that reasoning?
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149802 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:19 pm to
From slavery
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
10418 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

As opposed to the confederate soldiers fighting on the behalf of slave owners


Were there not slave holding States in the North during the war?
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14664 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:23 pm to
An incredibly sad chapter in our history. Brother Against Brother.

Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
10418 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Right about the time we lost this country for good too.


Bingo. We ceased to exist as a Federation of States and began on the path of becoming the Empire the founders fought to secede from in 1776.

If you're mad about the corruption in Minnesota, if you're mad about ICE in Minnesota, if you're mad about USAID, if you're mad any crap the Federal Government does no matter what your political leanings are, it is because both parties battle to control the center. When the South lost the war, the ultimate power check on the Federal Government was removed.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
70621 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Were there not slave holding States in the North during the war?



That's a very complicated question. Missouri and Kentucky tried to remain neutral but were pulled into the conflict due to their strategic importance. Maryland tried to secede but, due to its strategic location, the Federal government did everything in its power to jail secessionist leaders and replace them with loyalists. Delaware was the only slave state that remained loyal to the Union that enthusiastically committed itself to the Union. All the others had quite a bit of internal strife.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7477 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I'm talking about Lee vs. Grant you ingrate

Muh percentages lol, clown world.
He is talking about Lee and Grant, and he is talking about actual numbers, not percentages:
quote:

From 1862-1865, Robert E. Lee suffered 209,000 total casualties (killed, wounded, and missing). Over a similar period, Grant suffered 154,000 total casualties.
Reading is fundamental.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7477 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

What claim does a citizen in Kentucky have against a citizen in Hawaii if Hawaii decides to secede? This is completely ignoring Federalism
There you go again. Putting everything in state labels.

The person who lives in Kentucky is a citizen of the United States. The person who lives in Hawaii is a citizen of the United States. The United States is a nation. People from one part of the nation do not have the right to take federal property in their own part of the nation.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
10418 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

That's a very complicated question. Missouri and Kentucky tried to remain neutral but were pulled into the conflict due to their strategic importance. Maryland tried to secede but, due to its strategic location, the Federal government did everything in its power to jail secessionist leaders and replace them with loyalists. Delaware was the only slave state that remained loyal to the Union that enthusiastically committed itself to the Union. All the others had quite a bit of internal strife.


Completely agree. My response to the poster was that neither side had any interest in freeing slaves.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35645 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

. My response to the poster was that neither side had any interest in freeing slaves.



Which makes the South's decision to secede really stupid and short-sighted
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
73860 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Madison county probably has more Natchez millionaires than Natchez at this point. I personally know several that left.
Funny you should mention that because I thought the same thought (about Madison County having the most millionaires total in the State).

But honestly a million dollars isn’t what it once was.

A cursory check of AI gives me that $1M in 1860 is equal in buying power to $39M in 2026.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35645 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

Funny you should mention that because I thought the same thought (about Madison County having the most millionaires total in the State).

But honestly a million dollars isn’t what it once was.

A cursory check of AI gives me that $1M in 1860 is equal in buying power to $39M in 2026.




Hell, at one point East Feliciana was the richest county/parish in the US.

I was shocked when I learned that
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35645 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

What precedent was that?



That the Federal government could use military action to enforce Federal laws and quell a rebellion or secession effort.

Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
9926 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Pursuant to the 1934 Treaty Between the United States of America and Cuba, the lease can only be terminated: (1) by mutual agreement of both governments to end or modify the lease, or (2) the U.S. ceases to use the area for coaling and naval station purposes. The lease is perpetual; it does not have a fixed expiration date. The U.S. has indefinite control as long as it does not abandon the site.


"Perpetual" isn't perpetual when the country doesn't exist anymore, as Batista-ist Cuba hasn't since 1958. And none of that matters anyway since we're more powerful militarily and they can't kick us out. We're not staying there out of need or principle or any deep-seated reason of legality. Power. Politics.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35645 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

We're not staying there out of need



We very much are staying there out of need.



We need to have a presence in the only communist state in the Western Hemisphere.

It'd militarily and politically stupid to abandon our presence there.
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
10056 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 6:02 pm to
Most millionaires in Natchez did not support the Confederacy. The idea of war scared them to death. They had more in common with the Yankee upper class than Southern dirt farmers.
Adams County delegates voted against the Mississippi Bill of Secession in 1860.
Posted by TriStateAreaFootball
Member since Dec 2024
2038 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

How'd that work out?

It didn't work out because Lincoln's government won the war.
quote:

B. The CSA started the war. Remember those mostly peaceful cannons at Sumter?

The concept of "sovereignty" is a struggle for many people not just you.
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
2113 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

frick Grant


Who's your daddy, bitch?



You would've been one of the folks who paid a poor southern cracker to do your fighting, or used your position as a rich, slave owner to dodge the Confederate draft.
Posted by Harry Caray
Denial
Member since Aug 2009
20996 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

The concept of "sovereignty" is a struggle for many people not just you.

Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
19069 posts
Posted on 2/16/26 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

You would be wrong, but how did you surmise that reasoning?

Because you think the civil war has anything to do with modern federal oppression. Shows how clueless you are
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram