- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Darwin’s Doubt: the mathematical problem of evolution and DNA
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:42 am to Salmon
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:42 am to Salmon
Giant leaps in modification or creation of genes vs reaching stasis, both contained in the same theory, isnt congruent
Its like putting traffic lights on the autobahn. One person can make record time, if they make all the lights, while another can make an excuse about how slow they went due the time it took for them to make it through all the lights
Its very convenient in pushing a flawed theory forward, tho
Its like putting traffic lights on the autobahn. One person can make record time, if they make all the lights, while another can make an excuse about how slow they went due the time it took for them to make it through all the lights
Its very convenient in pushing a flawed theory forward, tho
1
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:42 am to Darth_Vader
This was new about a decade ago. It is now widely accepted. There has not been enough time for all of the crazy adaptations to have occurred randomly.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:42 am to Fun Bunch
What an amazing thread
We've hit the jackpot
No one claiming to believe in Creationism while hitting every single talking point
1. Its just a theory, not a law, and im simply challenging it by providing an alternative point of view
2. It doesnt explain how different species evolved from the same parent
3. It is mathematically impossible
4. It doesnt even adhere to the scientific method itself
Bravo. Bravo
We've hit the jackpot
No one claiming to believe in Creationism while hitting every single talking point
1. Its just a theory, not a law, and im simply challenging it by providing an alternative point of view
2. It doesnt explain how different species evolved from the same parent
3. It is mathematically impossible
4. It doesnt even adhere to the scientific method itself
Bravo. Bravo
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:43 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Well, first of all, if youre referencing the creation, this is pure stupidity on your part. The 6,000 year guesstimate is not Biblical. One priest threw it together, and the most moronic of the atheists/agnostics latched onto its fallacy. I've attended churches for decades and not once have we been taught the Earth is only 6,000 years old. Grow up
There are posters on this board who literally believe this though, so I don’t know why you’re getting angry.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:47 am to bayoubengals88
quote:
Well said. Tight and gift wrapped. And no response will be given.
You should edit to admit you were wrong. There are several response posts with links that ostensibly disagree.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:47 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Giant leaps in modification or creation of genes vs reaching stasis, both contained in the same theory, isnt congruent
why not?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:51 am to Darth_Vader
The power of time explains alot of things, 4 billion years is a very long time. Micro shifts can go a long way in 4 billion years.
Just like the pyramids they weren’t built on a modern time line. They were built over a lifetime.
The way I can be comfortable with evolution and religion is that the bible never says how or how long biblical creation took.
Just like the pyramids they weren’t built on a modern time line. They were built over a lifetime.
The way I can be comfortable with evolution and religion is that the bible never says how or how long biblical creation took.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:51 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Evolution
So how did evolution start?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:52 am to Pepe Lepew
quote:
Seems there are a few problems with accepted science
Science, just like nature, evolves over time.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:52 am to N2cars
quote:
I thought most educated scientists and researchers, whether they believe in God or not, had already dismissed the theory of evolution as a legitimate reason to explain life on Earth.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:53 am to Penrod
quote:
There has not been enough time for all of the crazy adaptations to have occurred randomly.
Says who?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:53 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
What an amazing thread
We've hit the jackpot
No one claiming to believe in Creationism while hitting every single talking point
1. Its just a theory, not a law, and im simply challenging it by providing an alternative point of view
2. It doesnt explain how different species evolved from the same parent
3. It is mathematically impossible
4. It doesnt even adhere to the scientific method itself
Bravo. Bravo
They have not brought up thermodynamics yet, but its coming
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:54 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
So how did evolution start?
I do not know, nor does the theory of evolution address abiogenesis
However there have been some extremely promising tests done on abiogenesis recently that are pretty wild
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:54 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
We evolved.
From what?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:56 am to Darth_Vader
You're right. Evolution is false. A superior being created life, and the being sent his word to Mohammad through the Qu'ran.
We're done here, right?
We're done here, right?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:57 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
And now that you've found him, despite him being amongst 0.001% of scientists who dispute evolution
This is not true. A lot of scientists have found the time frame from the Big Bang to now to be inadequate for evolution to have worked. Now that could mean that the Big Bang is wrong rather than evolution being wrong. But something needs explaining.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:59 am to Darth_Vader
The whole point of religion is to explain the why, not the how.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:00 am to Penrod
Would you look at that! Urban birds have evolved just since COVID:
Smithsonian - Beaks
"The dark-eyed junco study is also a reminder of how quickly evolution can occur. The common perception is that evolution takes place gradually, over thousands of years. But species can adapt much more quickly than that. And these changes often take place in plain sight.
“You don’t have to go to Antarctica or to the mountains in Nepal or to the plains of Africa,” Pamela Yeh, a study co-author and evolutionary biologist at UCLA, tells the Times. “You can go right out to your backyard … and see something pretty amazing happening.”"
Smithsonian - Beaks
"The dark-eyed junco study is also a reminder of how quickly evolution can occur. The common perception is that evolution takes place gradually, over thousands of years. But species can adapt much more quickly than that. And these changes often take place in plain sight.
“You don’t have to go to Antarctica or to the mountains in Nepal or to the plains of Africa,” Pamela Yeh, a study co-author and evolutionary biologist at UCLA, tells the Times. “You can go right out to your backyard … and see something pretty amazing happening.”"
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 11:04 am
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:01 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I do not know, nor does the theory of evolution address abiogenesis
Initial conditions matter and this is a glaring shortcoming in evolutionary theory (I'm being charitable because apart from having the correct initial conditions, this is not theory, but fantasy).
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:01 am to deltadummy
quote:where are we? Minneapolis?
A superior being created life, and the being sent his word to Mohammad through the Qu'ran.
Page 6 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News