Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Earliest ‘Jesus is God’ inscription found | Page 3 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Earliest ‘Jesus is God’ inscription found

Posted on 11/20/24 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
149243 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

The 1,800-year-old mosaic, discovered by an inmate
and the OT likes to talk down on inmates and former inmates. . shame ... Jesus still loves yall tho
This post was edited on 11/20/24 at 5:47 pm
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
41926 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 5:47 pm to
Posted by Stinger_1066
On a golf course
Member since Jul 2021
2899 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 5:49 pm to
I predict great things for this thread.
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
60009 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

and the OT likes to talk down on inmates and former inmates. . shame ... Jesus still loves yall tho
both St. Peter and St. Paul were in jail
This post was edited on 11/20/24 at 6:05 pm
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
16363 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Very Christ-like of you.


Sorry for partying.
Posted by Mushroom1968
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2023
5736 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

It’s kind of hard to challenge the Catholic Church’s interpretation of the Bible when the early Catholic Church wrote the Bible in the first place.



When it comes to early Church, is what Eastern Orthodox is today, the same as Catholics from the early Church? They just didn't want a pope?
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
6777 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24329 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Two centuries later constitutes “the very beginning”? The lady doth protest too much, methinks


Well considering we don’t really know when the bc/ad split happened and even at 230 years it’s like 3 generations removed from the eye witnesses. I’d say it’s a pretty good indicator of what was believed from the very beginning.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61141 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Me too!
how? It was a long time ago.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
10247 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

When it comes to early Church, is what Eastern Orthodox is today, the same as Catholics from the early Church? They just didn't want a pope?


Sort of. They split away from Rome and had patriarchs instead. They are considered to have apostolic succession just like Catholic bishops and priests because they have an unbroken line back to the 12 apostles and Jesus much like the Catholic Church.

That’s why the Catholic Church recognizes the Eucharist in the Eastern Orthodox Church as legitimately the body and blood of Christ since they have the power and authority to do that because of their unbroken line back to Christ and the apostles.

Pastor Jo Bleaux from First Harvest Church down the street is not considered to have that legitimate authority since he would not have a line back to Christ Christ and the apostles.
This post was edited on 11/20/24 at 6:17 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
47567 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:15 pm to
Posted by Mushroom1968
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2023
5736 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:16 pm to
Appreciate the reply
Posted by tiger2180
Member since Nov 2015
465 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:18 pm to
If you can’t beat them join them and control the narrative. The Romans tried to stop it and couldn’t, so they adapted/adopted.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
10247 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:21 pm to
No problem, my brother. I like talking about this stuff.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
70621 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

Well considering we don’t really know when the bc/ad split happened and even at 230 years it’s like 3 generations removed from the eye witnesses. I’d say it’s a pretty good indicator of what was believed from the very beginning.



Not only this, but you have the writings of the early Church Fathers that were circulating in the region around this time. These include the writings of such figures as Irenaeus of Lyons, a leader in the early Church who died about the year 202 - some 28 years earlier than when this tapestry is said to be dated. Irenaeus was a student of the early Christian bishop Polycarp of Smyrna who himself was a student of the Apostle John (author of the Gospel of John, Revelation, etc.). That's how close the year 230 was to the beginning of the Christian movement in historical terms.
This post was edited on 11/20/24 at 6:33 pm
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20943 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

John 12: 49 For I did not speak on My own initiative

He was humble about driving a Honda.
Posted by CatholicLSUDude
Member since Aug 2018
1036 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Cor 8:6: yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live. 2 Corinthians 11:31 The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, who is to be praised forever, knows that I am not lying. There is one God, the Father. Jesus has a God, who is the Father. Jesus is Lord. He is not equal to the Father. The Father has put all things at Jesus's feet and in not subject to Jesus. (I Cor 15: 27 For he “has put everything under his feet.”[c] Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28 When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.)


News like this must really hurt, huh? Yet another piece of solid evidence that the earliest Christians all knew Jesus was God. On this point the Church Fathers are clear. Your man-mad interpretation of those scriptures is devoid of any grounding in historical Christianity.

Also, John 1:1.


Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24329 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

the writings of the early Church Fathers


I don’t know how anyone reads the early church writings and doesn’t convert to Catholicism.
Posted by wasteland
City of peace
Member since Apr 2011
5917 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 7:12 pm to
Would love to bang a noon on that
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
5992 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

don’t know how anyone reads the early church writings and doesn’t convert to Catholicism.


All the other stuff in the 2,000 or so year history of the catholic church?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram