- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ketanji Brown Jackson: "Conservative Majority’s Recent Rulings Pose ‘Existential Threat"
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:07 am to Mandtgr47
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:07 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
there isn't anything she can do, legal or illegal, that would cause enough dems to vote against her...and I mean nothing....they will NOT give up that power (seat) NO MATTER WHAT.
She should be hung around the necks of all who voted for her but our politicians are all pussies scared of being called racist.
Her biggest critics should be black people with a shred of pride.
That dipshit Souter sure as Hell embarrassed me as a white guy, wasn't an idiot, just a stealth nominee guilty whyte boi piece of shite.
0
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:07 am to HeadCall
She is dumb no doubt, but I don't think she could possibly be as dumb as she comes across, could she? I believe she still believes that she is an activist, and doesn't realize she has to be a little less obvious in her current position. Someone said that she went to Harvard.....I have not looked, but if that's true, either they passed her for DEI, or she didn't go there. No way she passed there otherwise. Also, I'm assuming she passed the bar exam (although I know that it isn't extremely difficult to do).
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:15 am to SingleMalt1973
quote:
Even RBG didn’t say shite like,this.
RBG was a liberal but still a very intelligent and highly respected justice by her peers
KBJ is none of those things. I fear she is one of those toxic people that makes everyone who has to work with her miserable and that it forces some conservative justices to retire because they’re sick of dealing with it
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:22 am to Penrod
quote:
That’s a strange contrast. RBG was the height of graciousness. She was so far from contentious that she was hunting buddies with Scalia.
quote:
In an interview with the New York Times over the weekend, Ginsburg didn't hide her contempt for Trump, saying, "I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president" and that her late husband would have said it was "time for us to move to New Zealand."
quote:
She doubled down on those statements Monday to CNN, calling Trump a "faker."
"He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego...How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that," Ginsburg continued.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:33 am to KCT
quote:
She's becoming a piranha on the SC,
She is trying to create a little dysentery among the court
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:33 am to BCreed1
Black woman speaks and shite. When Wise Latina is calling her out it is bad.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:35 am to bcoop199
quote:
Listen to what Elena Kagan said just 3 years ago about nationwide injunctions.
quote:
What Made Justice Kagan Change Her Mind on Universal Injunctions?
When judges change their mind, they explain their reasons. Or at least they ought to, because that’s what makes their judgments trustworthy. But when the Supreme Court decided Trump v. CASA this term, Justice Elena Kagan suddenly changed her mind on universal injunctions—and didn’t explain why.
In 2022, she told an audience at Northwestern University Law School that it “can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stuck for the years that it takes to go through a normal process.”
She also criticized emergency actions more broadly, remarking that the court’s calendar used to be “spaced out so that we would have a break before we went back to the hothouse of decision-making. And just the relentless bringing of these emergencies petitions make that not the case anymore.”
of course that was (D)ifferent
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 6:37 am
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:06 am to Mandtgr47
She has an undergraduate and law degree from Harvard. It should be clear to people paying attention that a degree from an Ivy League school isn't what it used to be. I don't think we're too far from it actually being a negative for a lot of employers and I think it already is in some industries.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Bases her rulings on how she feels, not the constitution or laws.
Like all liberals do.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:13 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:And this gentlemen, is what I've come to learn - is the way most women lead. Those freaks Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski -- we should have thrown them back.
Bases her rulings on how she feels, not the constitution or laws.
The best woman are strong, almost like men, hang around men, want to be mothers, understand there is a difference between men and women and want to perpetuate that tradition.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 10:13 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
She is a nut.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 10:32 am to Tunasntigers92
Kunta Ketanji
Posted on 7/9/25 at 10:34 am to BCreed1
94% of black females are incompatible with western civilization. Judge Jackson falls into that group.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:52 pm to BCreed1
If there were 5 justices like her, that would truly be an existential threat for America.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:56 pm to BCreed1
She was even corrected by the wise Latina Justice Soto after the case with the federal firings where the justices voted 8-1. Wise Latina said it’s not about feelings, but the law.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 4:02 pm to oldskule
quote:
OBiden weaponized every department he could.....
Posted on 7/9/25 at 4:07 pm to BCreed1
She doesnt know the difference between a man and a woman, but noooow she's crazy. 
Posted on 7/10/25 at 5:14 pm to Tunasntigers92
quote:
Amy went in dry on her, I don't to much care for her, being shes a but of a drak horse, but she gave ketanji what for, something pretty much unheard between the justices.
It happened again-
quote:
On Tuesday, she was churning it out again, penning a 15-page dissent to an unsigned 8-to-1 order lifting a lower court's ruling that blocked the Trump administration from slashing the government workforce and dismantling federal agencies.
Jackson reeled back and let 'em have it, writing that the majority decision was 'not only truly unfortunate but also hubristic and senseless.'
'What one person (or president) might call bureaucratic bloat is a farmer's prospect for a healthy crop, a coal miner's chance to breathe free from black lung, or a preschooler's opportunity to learn in a safe environment,' she added.
Sotomayor had enough
quote:
To which fellow court liberal – and diehard Yankee fan – Justice Sonia Sotomayor threw her colleague a Bronx-style brush back pitch.
'The plans themselves are not before this Court, at this stage, and we thus have no occasion to consider whether they can and will be carried out consistent with the constraints of law,' Sotomayor wrote. 'I join the court's stay because it leaves the District Court free to consider those questions in the first instance.'
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News