- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New shooting in Minnesota
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:33 pm to ABearsFanNMS
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:33 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Ummm you are defending a guy that was armed and resisting arrest….stop and think about that for a second.
He’s a DEI dumbass.
0
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:33 pm to TDTOM
quote:hopefully many more. Why don’t you go up there and check it out.
Holy shite, how many more murders are they going to commit in this city?
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:33 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
My point still stands that having a gun found isn’t immediately inculpatory evidence.
You know where the likelihood is headed here. Keep huffing and puffing.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:34 pm to ChiGator
quote:
I thought this board was pro 2A? Just not when it’s a liberal I guess
This is stupid.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:34 pm to beebefootballfan
quote:
Don’t give them a reason to fire the first shot and the others don’t really matter.
This is objectively false.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:34 pm to ABearsFanNMS
ANY city in this country you approach a LEO with a weapon on you, or if he conducts a traffic stop or any interaction, he is going to disarm you. Period.
If you resist, you may get shot. Now we all know that. If you are being arrested by a LEO in any city in this country and you go for a weapon, you likely get shot. Again, indisputable,
If this person went for a gun, why is this different? Why bring a weapon to a protest where just such as this could happen?
If you resist, you may get shot. Now we all know that. If you are being arrested by a LEO in any city in this country and you go for a weapon, you likely get shot. Again, indisputable,
If this person went for a gun, why is this different? Why bring a weapon to a protest where just such as this could happen?
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:34 pm to the808bass
Ya super comparable dumb frick. One was breaking into a political building during a riot, the other was standing on a public street.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:35 pm to ChiGator
quote:
the other was standing on a public street.
Then what happened?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:35 pm to the808bass
quote:
You know where the likelihood is headed here. Keep huffing and puffing.
when he was shot, the guy dropped the gun on the sidewalk
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:36 pm to ChiGator
quote:
Ya super comparable dumb frick. One was breaking into a political building during a riot, the other was standing on a public street.
Just as I suspected. You’re fine with conservatives being shot and you’re a giant hypocrite. And you sound like you smell.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:36 pm to Victor R Franko
quote:
Doesn't matter now clean or not. People will see what they want to see out of it, and they'll argue over it until the cows come home.
This is correct. We are in Rorschach test politics now. There is no one side of truth, everyone see what they want and the truth is defined upon political ideology for the left.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:36 pm to the808bass
quote:
And that means?
Would your response be the same if he had a long rap sheet?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:37 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
“At 9:05 AM CT, as DHS law enforcement officers were conducting a targeted operation in Minneapolis against an illegal alien wanted for violent assault, an individual approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun," DHS said in a statement"
Approached armed with a cell phone seems more accurate. Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. if he reached for a gun during the altercation there would be a reason to shoot, but they really are reaching with that PR statement.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:37 pm to ChiGator
quote:
Ya super comparable dumb frick. One was breaking into a political building during a riot, the other was standing on a public street.
Disengenuous count.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:37 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Would your response be the same if he had a long rap sheet?
Yeah.
Does it matter if the agents involved have long histories with the agency and clean records?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:38 pm to the808bass
quote:
ou know where the likelihood is headed here. Keep huffing and puffing.
He’s all but confessed he knows this was a good shoot. He’s just too loyal to his side to admit it.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:38 pm to antibarner
At the end of the day, you are a certifiably brain dead fricking RETARD if you do not put your hands behind your head and immediately make it known to law enforcement that you are legally carrying a concealed firearm in the event they decide to arrest you. Period and end of discussion. The communist got killed because he was a fricking moron.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:38 pm to ChiGator
quote:
Ya super comparable dumb frick. One was breaking into a political building during a riot, the other was standing on a public street.
Another gator retard
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:39 pm to ChiGator
quote:
Ya super comparable dumb frick. One was unarmed, breaking into a political building during a riot, the other was armed, fighting with federal LEOs on a public street.
Added more facts you left out, for some reason.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:39 pm to the808bass
That wasn't a cell phone they showed. He had a weapon . Why bring a weapon to a protest like that? The height of stupidity.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 12:42 pm
Page 17 of 67
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News