Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Officer cell phone footage released | Page 33 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Officer cell phone footage released

Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by gmac8604
Green Bay, WI
Member since Jun 2012
1345 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

ICE are not police.


But ICE are police.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39289 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Fact: She was harassing ICE all day and was planning to continue that

Based on what information?



Her dyke friend.
I've asked at least a dozen times for a link to that. Why hasn't anyone been able to produce it?
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
18674 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:21 pm to
I have no sympathy for anyone other than the ICE agent, the dog and the owners of the two vehicles she demolished.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21281 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

He called her a fricking bitch immediately after shooting her


He called her a fricking bitch like anyone else who got hit by a car would.

quote:

Think for yourself and don't just parrot


This is hilarious. Lecturing people not to parrot anything while you and a handful of idiots parrot the same false narratives page after page.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
18674 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:22 pm to
Google it. It's all over the internet.

Hell, they're talking about it on NBC nightly right now.
Posted by Christopher Columbo
Member since Jun 2015
3002 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

I've asked at least a dozen times for a link to that. Why hasn't anyone been able to produce it?


If you're not cubbies, you have the exact same programming
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38567 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:25 pm to
So is your point to:
1. Exonerate Good and indict the LEO?
2. Bring down the temperature
3. Balance the perspectives
4. Have a proper conversation about law, order and protesting



Like what's the point? Because it comes off like you are trying to prove her innocence, and that's just not possible with all the evidence. And you haven't moved from that point.

Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44564 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

That's not cell phone video. It's too steady. That is body cam video


Its a cell phone.

Go to the 19 second mark look at the car's window you can see the reflection of him holding a cell phone.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

ICE are not police. A police officer would never walk in front of a suspect's vehicle. And if a police officer did somehow find themselves in this dumbasses' position, no they should not fire multiple shots through the driver side window while safely out of harms way. Filming a video the entire time and didn't even drop his cell phone


This “ICE are not police” thing is a semantic distraction. They are empowered to do law enforcement and handed weapons by the federal government. Either way, police or not, they are allowed to defend themselves.

The rest of your post is honing in on details but misses the macro view of the situation.

The lady accelerated right at him and hit him. That happened and none of your critique of his positioning changes that.

I don’t like law enforcement shooting people unnecessarily. I don’t like law enforcement putting themselves in harms way and then killing people. I instinctively and consistently criticize police, because I am generally uncomfortable with giving other citizens power over us, even though I know there is a need for law enforcement.

But again, she accelerated right at him and hit him with the car. Cops ALWAYS shoot people who do that, and it’s always justified based on their claim of self defense in the face of grave injury or death.
This was a tragedy, but we are a civilized people with laws and, thank God, we all have a right to self defense, so we should all be lamenting that it happened but moving on from it.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Narrator: beating a hasty retreat from his most recently indefensible position, The chimpanzee takes a position in a new tree from which he can continue to fling his bodily fluids.


I don't see the PoliBoard as a battle. I'm not here to establish a position and defend it at all costs.

I'm just interested in learning. I appreciate everyone who helps me with that...particularly if I didn't have the right information or my thinking was flawed.

You have helped me understand some things better. Thanks.




Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
4123 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

How much refuse did those departments produce daily? Did the deputies make a mess of the bathrooms?

high angle rescue team and search and rescue. you'd shite your pants if you tried to do what i do
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39289 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Google it. It's all over the internet.

Not finding it. Could you kindly provide a link?

tia
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
32942 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

How about if I let Justice Alito explain that one to you:

"We think our decision in Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U. S. 194 (2004) (per curiam) squarely demonstrates that no clearly established law precluded petitioners’ conduct at the time in question. In Brosseau, we held that a police officer did not violate clearly established law when she fired at a fleeing vehicle to prevent possible harm to “other officers on foot who [she] believed were in the immediate area, . . . occupied vehicles in [the driver’s] path[,] and . . . any other citizens who might be in the area.... In Brosseau, an officer on foot fired at a driver who had just begun to flee and who had not yet driven his car in a dangerous manner...."

"We now consider respondent’s contention that, even if the use of deadly force was permissible, petitioners acted unreasonably in firing a total of 15 shots. We reject that argument. It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. As petitioners noted below, “if lethal force is justified, officers are taught to keep shooting until the threat is over.”

9-0 decision in Plumhoff v. Rickard, 2014.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21281 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

I've asked at least a dozen times for a link to that. Why hasn't anyone been able to produce it?


Here ya go. LINK
quote:

It was through her involvement in the school community that Good became involved in “ICE Watch” — a loose coalition of activists dedicated to disrupting ICE raids in the sanctuary city.


quote:

Renee Good] was trained against these ICE agents — what to do, what not to do, it’s a very thorough training,” Leesa said. “To listen to commands, to know your rights, to whistle when you see an ICE agent,” she added.


These two idiots were out doing exactly what they were trained to do. They were cosplaying as social justice super heroes, following ice vehicles and intentionally trying to disrupt legal law enforcement operations. The video shows them making clear what they were doing. This incident crystallizes what happens when your super hero fantasy world collides with reality.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 5:41 pm
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
18674 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:42 pm to
No

I don't care if you refuse to believe it.

...and if you actually looked, you'd find it. I just googled "good's history protesting ice" and there's over 1500 results.
Posted by AquaAg84
Member since May 2013
3677 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

A traffic offense isn't a federal crime. ICE doesn't have general law enforcement powers. They can only enforce immigration laws and federal crimes they witness. She doesn't appear to be blocking the street any more than was Agent Ross's SUV.

I'm not trying to be a pain in the arse. Good alone is responsible for her death. She DEFINITELY intended to harass ICE. I just want to see evidence of her crossing the line to interference.




Is it intentional?

Well, yes, yes it is. Your schtick was blown today after your video 'analysis' yesterday.. Everyone is now well aware.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39289 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Like what's the point? Because it comes off like you are trying to prove her innocence, and that's just not possible with all the evidence. And you haven't moved from that point.
I've never tried to prove her innocence. You folks keep twisting my words because if you are a Trump supporter then it is your sworn duty to vilify the driver at any cost and anyone who dares question.
But I'm used to it. That's how this board has always worked.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

This persona is done. Log out in ignominy. Start a new one


I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It's a simple question: can an ICE agent arrest an American citizen for a state offense?

Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
4123 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

remember earlier when you said you were "confident" she didn't see the officer in front of her, then i posted several screen shots proving you wrong, and you never replied?

are you still confident in that?

would you say that your repeated lie of "she didn't see him" is just an insane fantasy with no provable fact to back it up?


yeah i missed it. there's hundreds of posts in this thread guy. i'm not hitting refresh every 10 seconds 20 hours a day like stdtiger
and yes, i'm still confident in that. imo - and same as many others in here, she was looking at the guy reaching through her window and yarding on her door. in all videos, you can see the shooter creepin up from the passenger side - apparently having learned nothing from being dragged recently. i do agree when she put it in drive and looked forward, she saw him then, and hence why she turned the wheels to the right to try and avoid him
you make it sound like she stared him down for several seconds and then gunned it full speed with intent to strike him
and honestly, even if she did, guy's a puss. oh noes! i got struck by a car going 5 mph! waaah!
i'd say him popping off 3 rounds in a crowded neighborhood is far more dangerous than a scared woman trying to get away
but maga gonna maga
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24271 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

I'm just interested in learning. I appreciate everyone who helps me with that...particularly if I didn't have the right information or my thinking was flawed.


Here's something you can learn. Don't allow the narration from a liar nytimes retard of a video (that illuminates the exact opposite of the retards narration ) impact your perspective.

If you work for that organization you should be assumed to be a stupid dishonest piece of shite.

Think you can learn that?
Jump to page
Page First 31 32 33 34 35 ... 40
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 33 of 40Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram