- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Officer cell phone footage released
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:20 pm to Darnell5445
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:20 pm to Darnell5445
quote:
ICE are not police.
But ICE are police.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:20 pm to hogcard1964
quote:I've asked at least a dozen times for a link to that. Why hasn't anyone been able to produce it?
Fact: She was harassing ICE all day and was planning to continue that
Based on what information?
Her dyke friend.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:21 pm to Figgy
I have no sympathy for anyone other than the ICE agent, the dog and the owners of the two vehicles she demolished.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:22 pm to Darnell5445
quote:
He called her a fricking bitch immediately after shooting her
He called her a fricking bitch like anyone else who got hit by a car would.
quote:
Think for yourself and don't just parrot
This is hilarious. Lecturing people not to parrot anything while you and a handful of idiots parrot the same false narratives page after page.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:22 pm to TX Tiger
Google it. It's all over the internet.
Hell, they're talking about it on NBC nightly right now.
Hell, they're talking about it on NBC nightly right now.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:23 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I've asked at least a dozen times for a link to that. Why hasn't anyone been able to produce it?
If you're not cubbies, you have the exact same programming

Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:25 pm to TX Tiger
So is your point to:
1. Exonerate Good and indict the LEO?
2. Bring down the temperature
3. Balance the perspectives
4. Have a proper conversation about law, order and protesting
Like what's the point? Because it comes off like you are trying to prove her innocence, and that's just not possible with all the evidence. And you haven't moved from that point.
1. Exonerate Good and indict the LEO?
2. Bring down the temperature
3. Balance the perspectives
4. Have a proper conversation about law, order and protesting
Like what's the point? Because it comes off like you are trying to prove her innocence, and that's just not possible with all the evidence. And you haven't moved from that point.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:26 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
That's not cell phone video. It's too steady. That is body cam video
Its a cell phone.
Go to the 19 second mark look at the car's window you can see the reflection of him holding a cell phone.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:30 pm to Darnell5445
quote:
ICE are not police. A police officer would never walk in front of a suspect's vehicle. And if a police officer did somehow find themselves in this dumbasses' position, no they should not fire multiple shots through the driver side window while safely out of harms way. Filming a video the entire time and didn't even drop his cell phone
This “ICE are not police” thing is a semantic distraction. They are empowered to do law enforcement and handed weapons by the federal government. Either way, police or not, they are allowed to defend themselves.
The rest of your post is honing in on details but misses the macro view of the situation.
The lady accelerated right at him and hit him. That happened and none of your critique of his positioning changes that.
I don’t like law enforcement shooting people unnecessarily. I don’t like law enforcement putting themselves in harms way and then killing people. I instinctively and consistently criticize police, because I am generally uncomfortable with giving other citizens power over us, even though I know there is a need for law enforcement.
But again, she accelerated right at him and hit him with the car. Cops ALWAYS shoot people who do that, and it’s always justified based on their claim of self defense in the face of grave injury or death.
This was a tragedy, but we are a civilized people with laws and, thank God, we all have a right to self defense, so we should all be lamenting that it happened but moving on from it.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:34 pm to the808bass
quote:
Narrator: beating a hasty retreat from his most recently indefensible position, The chimpanzee takes a position in a new tree from which he can continue to fling his bodily fluids.
I don't see the PoliBoard as a battle. I'm not here to establish a position and defend it at all costs.
I'm just interested in learning. I appreciate everyone who helps me with that...particularly if I didn't have the right information or my thinking was flawed.
You have helped me understand some things better. Thanks.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:37 pm to kilo
quote:
How much refuse did those departments produce daily? Did the deputies make a mess of the bathrooms?
high angle rescue team and search and rescue. you'd shite your pants if you tried to do what i do
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:38 pm to hogcard1964
quote:Not finding it. Could you kindly provide a link?
Google it. It's all over the internet.
tia
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:41 pm to Earnest_P
quote:
How about if I let Justice Alito explain that one to you:
"We think our decision in Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U. S. 194 (2004) (per curiam) squarely demonstrates that no clearly established law precluded petitioners’ conduct at the time in question. In Brosseau, we held that a police officer did not violate clearly established law when she fired at a fleeing vehicle to prevent possible harm to “other officers on foot who [she] believed were in the immediate area, . . . occupied vehicles in [the driver’s] path[,] and . . . any other citizens who might be in the area.... In Brosseau, an officer on foot fired at a driver who had just begun to flee and who had not yet driven his car in a dangerous manner...."
"We now consider respondent’s contention that, even if the use of deadly force was permissible, petitioners acted unreasonably in firing a total of 15 shots. We reject that argument. It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. As petitioners noted below, “if lethal force is justified, officers are taught to keep shooting until the threat is over.”
9-0 decision in Plumhoff v. Rickard, 2014.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:41 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I've asked at least a dozen times for a link to that. Why hasn't anyone been able to produce it?
Here ya go. LINK
quote:
It was through her involvement in the school community that Good became involved in “ICE Watch” — a loose coalition of activists dedicated to disrupting ICE raids in the sanctuary city.
quote:
Renee Good] was trained against these ICE agents — what to do, what not to do, it’s a very thorough training,” Leesa said. “To listen to commands, to know your rights, to whistle when you see an ICE agent,” she added.
These two idiots were out doing exactly what they were trained to do. They were cosplaying as social justice super heroes, following ice vehicles and intentionally trying to disrupt legal law enforcement operations. The video shows them making clear what they were doing. This incident crystallizes what happens when your super hero fantasy world collides with reality.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:42 pm to TX Tiger
No
I don't care if you refuse to believe it.
...and if you actually looked, you'd find it. I just googled "good's history protesting ice" and there's over 1500 results.
I don't care if you refuse to believe it.
...and if you actually looked, you'd find it. I just googled "good's history protesting ice" and there's over 1500 results.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
A traffic offense isn't a federal crime. ICE doesn't have general law enforcement powers. They can only enforce immigration laws and federal crimes they witness. She doesn't appear to be blocking the street any more than was Agent Ross's SUV.
I'm not trying to be a pain in the arse. Good alone is responsible for her death. She DEFINITELY intended to harass ICE. I just want to see evidence of her crossing the line to interference.
Is it intentional?
Well, yes, yes it is. Your schtick was blown today after your video 'analysis' yesterday.. Everyone is now well aware.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:45 pm to Freauxzen
quote:I've never tried to prove her innocence. You folks keep twisting my words because if you are a Trump supporter then it is your sworn duty to vilify the driver at any cost and anyone who dares question.
Like what's the point? Because it comes off like you are trying to prove her innocence, and that's just not possible with all the evidence. And you haven't moved from that point.
But I'm used to it. That's how this board has always worked.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
This persona is done. Log out in ignominy. Start a new one
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It's a simple question: can an ICE agent arrest an American citizen for a state offense?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:48 pm to Logician
quote:
remember earlier when you said you were "confident" she didn't see the officer in front of her, then i posted several screen shots proving you wrong, and you never replied?
are you still confident in that?
would you say that your repeated lie of "she didn't see him" is just an insane fantasy with no provable fact to back it up?
yeah i missed it. there's hundreds of posts in this thread guy. i'm not hitting refresh every 10 seconds 20 hours a day like stdtiger
and yes, i'm still confident in that. imo - and same as many others in here, she was looking at the guy reaching through her window and yarding on her door. in all videos, you can see the shooter creepin up from the passenger side - apparently having learned nothing from being dragged recently. i do agree when she put it in drive and looked forward, she saw him then, and hence why she turned the wheels to the right to try and avoid him
you make it sound like she stared him down for several seconds and then gunned it full speed with intent to strike him
and honestly, even if she did, guy's a puss. oh noes! i got struck by a car going 5 mph! waaah!
i'd say him popping off 3 rounds in a crowded neighborhood is far more dangerous than a scared woman trying to get away
but maga gonna maga
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:49 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I'm just interested in learning. I appreciate everyone who helps me with that...particularly if I didn't have the right information or my thinking was flawed.
Here's something you can learn. Don't allow the narration from a liar nytimes retard of a video (that illuminates the exact opposite of the retards narration ) impact your perspective.
If you work for that organization you should be assumed to be a stupid dishonest piece of shite.
Think you can learn that?
Popular
Back to top


0







