- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:13 pm to David_DJS
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:13 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Apologies if this was covered earlier in the threat but - to be clear, are you suggesting that the CDC (and other "big med") didn't purposefully mislead the public (and probably a lot of its MDs) during the pandemic?
I'm not sure where you are getting this from, as it isn't in the post you quoted. The 'purposefully' is doing a lot of work here.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:31 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
If your Google search has led you to believe “psychopathy” (pay attention to the use of quotes) is a diagnosable medical condition today, than you either googled wrong or misinterpreted.
I googled DSM-5 and Psychosis and what i quoted is part of what came up. Are you arguing "psychosis" is not categorized in DSM-5 or are you hung up on psychosis vs psychopathy?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:47 pm to TigerDoc
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:50 pm to BugAC
quote:
are you hung up on psychosis vs psychopathy?
Wait......you believe these are the same thing?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:57 pm to BugAC
quote:
I googled DSM-5 and Psychosis and what i quoted is part of what came up. Are you arguing "psychosis" is not categorized in DSM-5 or are you hung up on psychosis vs psychopathy?
Yes, in medicine particular words have particular meanings. I used quotes for a reason. If you can't appreciate that distinction, you are simply underscoring my point. "Psychopathy" is not a clinical entity with diagnostic criteria in the DSMV. This is not something that one can debate. It's a fact that even Bonds has conceded.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:00 pm to Jimmy Russel
Yeah, that's the system. He says everything about vaccines are corrupt. It's what he does.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:09 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I'm not sure where you are getting this from, as it isn't in the post you quoted. The 'purposefully' is doing a lot of work here.
You engaged the poster "Flats" after he had commented about how dishonest the CDC/others were about Covid. You posted something about it being just his "feelings" ... without stitching the whole exchange together, you came across like you didn't recognize/acknowledge all the misleading, and yes - a lot of it purposeful - that "big med" engaged in over Covid. So I asked the question - are you suggesting that didn't happen?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:33 pm to TigerDoc
quote:They're still itt. All you have to do is hit the back button
See bonds? - he brought a good faith question. You can do it
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:35 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:There you are. I was wondering what happened to you
onmymedicalgrind
quote:
He actually doesn’t have any knowledge or independent thought. He just uses Chat GPT. Not kidding
But keep tripling down on stupid
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:35 pm to somethingdifferent
everyone else can do it. I believe in you.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:38 pm to David_DJS
Yeah I was making fun of him because he’s stupid.
Regardless, my perspective will be different from yours, but what I suspect you want is something to reassure yourself of your opinion and not something close to the truth. If that’s what you want to believe go ahead. At this point there isn’t anything I can say or experiences I can relate that would reflect what you want to hear. You can believe as you like. It won’t make a difference in the end.
Regardless, my perspective will be different from yours, but what I suspect you want is something to reassure yourself of your opinion and not something close to the truth. If that’s what you want to believe go ahead. At this point there isn’t anything I can say or experiences I can relate that would reflect what you want to hear. You can believe as you like. It won’t make a difference in the end.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:40 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:MONEY genius. It's incredible that you can't understand that's a "real problem." Even doctors are saying this
It has been fun watching him describe the problems with peer review without actually mentioning any real problems
Dr. Marcia Angell
Richard Horton
Dr. Fiona Godlee
Because you're being especially obtuse, I'll throw in some more
Journal reviewers are not exempt from bias
Journal reviewers can occasionally fail to detect errors
Who keeps the journals accountable for these issues?
But go on about MUH "SYMPTOMS"
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:42 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Running away. What a winner
Once he did that during our debate, I moved on
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:45 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:Says the person tripling down on stupid
They truly don't know what they don't know and that never seems to inform their opinions
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:45 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Running away. What a winner
If you want to view it that way, thats fine.
I just know there's not enough hours in the day to try to teach a cute little doggy like you calculus. I'm OK with you calling me a quitter for not giving it a go
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:46 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Are there problems with the peer review process, yes or no
I guess you think that means you know more about medicine than people who studied medicine
You won't answer the question. Why is that, tough guy?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:47 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
MONEY genius. It's incredible that you can't understand that's a "real problem."
And again, neither RFK nor Trump are going to be able to unwind the complete regulatory and academic capture.
quote:
Journal reviewers are not exempt from bias
No shite. There is also no real way to combat this, as every human has some degree of bias.
quote:
Journal reviewers can occasionally fail to detect errors
Wow, some hard hitting stuff from our expert peer review …reviewer?
quote:
Who keeps the journals accountable for these issues?
Other scientists and professionals, usually, who have done a pretty good job all things considered. But who watches the watchmen, do you think?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:47 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:If they didn't have the genetic fallacy, they would commit suicide. It's their security blanket.
But you ALWAYS attack the messenger
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:47 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Are there problems with the peer review process, yes or no
Didn't you already copy and paste this into chat GPT the other day
Posted on 9/8/25 at 4:48 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Says the person tripling down on stupid
Oh no what will happen if I quadruple down?
Popular
Back to top


2




