- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: QB transfer updates
Posted on 12/30/25 at 1:11 am to Epic Cajun
Posted on 12/30/25 at 1:11 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
I don’t think you can sit on your hands if he isn’t granted a waiver before January 2nd.
Does anybody actually know when a decision is supposed to be made with Chambliss eligibility? It was supposed to have been decided two weeks ago but still nothing. Unless there actually was a decision but Ole Miss or whoever is keeping it a huge secret for now and not letting anything out to the public.
0
Posted on 12/30/25 at 1:41 am to DBG
All this says is LSU is contacting and jockeying for all the top QBs. Did anyone expect less with the money they promised?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:45 am to Demonbengal
Think the girlfriend at Tech has that one sewn up
Posted on 12/30/25 at 6:42 am to Robcrzy
quote:
He won’t be! this will be a bad pickup if we get him. He won’t even be ready for Clemson game people need to do their damn research on this injury
Have you?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 6:44 am to Captain Crown
quote:
Think the girlfriend at Tech has that one sewn up
Yep girlfriends can’t transfer until they sit for a year. Sorry fellas.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:11 am to Nado Jenkins83
Well, it might be Chambless, but we are not complicating it.
It’s complicated because we still don’t know if he is eligible.
Are we going to go into the second week of January waiting on Chambliss and the NCAA?
It’s complicated because we still don’t know if he is eligible.
Are we going to go into the second week of January waiting on Chambliss and the NCAA?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:15 am to DBG
I'll drop this without commentary
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:46 am to DBG
Every LSU fan should be excited about what the portal will bring. Lane knows how to build an offense. And expect some big splash moves that will lead to LSU fielding a very productive and exciting LSU offense in 2026.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:47 am to Lester Earl
I assume that epa is for the qb runs?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:00 am to MOT
I forgot where I had it saved from but I believe :
Epa per play is all plays
QB Run rate is epa per run
Epa per play is all plays
QB Run rate is epa per run
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:05 am to Lester Earl
I checked the math for 5 or 6 of them and run rate appears to just be qb runs as a percentage of qb plays, so you’re probably correct with the epa being for all plays.
Which makes it look even worse for those at the bottom.
Which makes it look even worse for those at the bottom.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:10 am to MOT
quote:
qb runs as a percentage of qb plays
I thought that too, but if you compare the first 2, Chiles has a better measure despite less QB runs.
Unless the QB runs stat is just designed runs & not scrambles, which is easily separated. However separating the actual yardage may be a little more difficult.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:11 am to LSUcajun77
quote:
Sean Payton did.
Sean Payton also didn't have unrestricted free agency either. Imagine Carson Palmer tell the Bengals I'm leaving or Donovan McNabb telling the Eagles to piss off; Sean Payton has almost unlimited money and we can throw indoors for at least half the season.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:15 am to Captain Crown
quote:
Think the girlfriend at Tech has that one sewn up
Burrow was considering LSU & Cincinnati. Burrow's girlfriend was at Cincinnati. O still got Joe somehow. Apparently, it can occasionally be defeated.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:37 am to Lester Earl
For Chiles I think the run rate, despite fewer runs, is just a function of being involved in fewer plays. Maybe he was injured?
I wonder if the number of runs reflects total rush attempts, as it shows in their typical stat line, minus the number of times they were sacked. So it would be positive scrambles and designed runs. It seems like that would be an easy formula as opposed to looking at it play by play for everyone.
Regardless, I think being at the top of the list is better than being lower, and some of those names aren’t necessarily the ones being the most talked about. Was that your take away also?
I wonder if the number of runs reflects total rush attempts, as it shows in their typical stat line, minus the number of times they were sacked. So it would be positive scrambles and designed runs. It seems like that would be an easy formula as opposed to looking at it play by play for everyone.
Regardless, I think being at the top of the list is better than being lower, and some of those names aren’t necessarily the ones being the most talked about. Was that your take away also?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:00 am to MOT
quote:
despite fewer runs, is just a function of being involved in fewer plays. Maybe he was injured?
Ah yeah, derp. Need to finish my coffee
quote:
Was that your take away also?
Not a ton, just try and align some of these numbers with the eye test. I have long thought Lagway would be a difficult fix and this kind of backs it up. I think he would really have to lean into the run aspect of his game to make the throwing easier. I’d rather not find out.
Sorsby was my top guy but I think Leavitt has some of the same attributes. Obviously working with a limited sample size in 2025. But he is more in that Corral/Dart mold that Kiffin has had success with before.
I haven’t watched enough of the other guys besides Hoover.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:11 am to OblnTiger
quote:
What makes you so high on Brown? Just curious, maybe I'm missing something. Seems like he has sloppy footwork and mechanics to me.
He does. It leads to inconsistency and spells of inaccuracy. He’s somewhat like Taylen Green in that the athleticism jumps out of the screen, but he makes a lot of mistakes that make you shake your head.
Also worth noting- he’s been with an offensive-minded coach in Golesh, so these things not being ironed out already should be a concern.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 9:18 am
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:13 am to Lester Earl
The Cincinnati kid has some good video out there. Wouldn't mind seeing him in Lane's offense.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:14 am to LSUFreek
quote:
Burrow was considering LSU & Cincinnati. Burrow's girlfriend was at Cincinnati. O still got Joe somehow. Apparently, it can occasionally be defeated.
Cinci was a G5 program at the time, so that part of the equation was pretty out of balance.
Tech may only be in the Big 12 and Lubbock is no paradise, but they have a ton of money and they’re sitting in the playoffs right now. That makes them pretty formidable, girlfriend or not.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:14 am to GeauxLSU4
quote:i mean, couldn't Dante Moore decide to return to Oregon for another season? They might not even be in the market for a QB
Leavitt is from Oregon. I’d have to think they are the leader for him.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News