Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us LSU #1 Overall Seed? | Page 2 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: LSU #1 Overall Seed?

Posted on 5/11/25 at 11:51 am to
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
79979 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:

They seed 1 through 16.



Cool... top 8 is still all that matters.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
79979 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Yeah idiot...I was watching Mcdonald pitch back in the day. I dgaf if we are #1 or not as long as top 8....was just saying we haven't been in position to be 1 in a while this year and finishing like we appear to be might put us there. Of course, some younger edgy punk gonna act like an idiot. Guarantee seen more and been to more LSU baseball games than you, probably at least twice as many. I've seen you post on here...you one of the little emotional bitches when losing.



You calling anyone else emotional here is pretty ironic
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28370 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 11:54 am to
Here’s a good article deep-dive into tournament seeding over the years by the way…

LINK: Baseball tournament seed analysis


quote:

In a sport as wildly unpredictable as baseball, just how important is seeding when it comes to paving a path to the Men's College World Series? One part to the answer: No. 1 regional seeds have accounted for just under 75% of all MCWS participants since the NCAA baseball tournament's current format was introduced in 1999. So, do the top-ranked teams have a fast track to Omaha? According to the data, more often than not, yes. But does the team at the very top of the rankings always win it all? History says no. We'll get to that later. First, let's review the tournament format:
This post was edited on 5/11/25 at 12:03 pm
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
12133 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 11:56 am to
Probably won't have the RPI for that. SOS isn't strong enough. Besides, often times that #16 seed that you pair up with in the SR got hot at the end of the season just in time to host a regional. Not typically a team you want to play
This post was edited on 5/11/25 at 11:58 am
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
67129 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 11:59 am to
Matchups are way more important than claiming the #1 overall seed.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
108338 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

They seed 1 through 16.


But only the top 8 are guaranteed to host a Super Regional.
Posted by Mobiletiggah
Mobile Alabama
Member since Mar 2021
3976 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 12:31 pm to
#1 seeds historically have not faired well at winning it all. Top 8 and home field to get to Omaha is really what matters.
Posted by friendlyobservation
Member since Mar 2024
4504 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 12:33 pm to
isn't #1 seed a curse? I'd rather not have it. Has anyone who was #1 won anything? at least recently? feels like a curse.
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
22360 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 12:36 pm to
Tennessee did last year
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
57247 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Top 8 is all that matters.


Before they seeded 1-16 i would have agreed with this.. all else being equal id rather be paired up with the 16 vs the 9.

Although catching a hot team could happen from 1-8.

Could not care less about the #1 curse. It has to end some time and we've never been #1.

With Hoover being a max of 3 games im less worried about fatigue as well. Lets win out
This post was edited on 5/11/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted by MikeTheTiger71
Member since Dec 2021
4416 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Here’s a good article deep-dive into tournament seeding over the years by the way…


So with Tennessee’s win 2 overall #1 seeds have won. No other seed has more than 3. It’s no better or worse to be a #1 seed. It just shows the relatively random nature of who wins it all.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
79979 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

else being equal id rather be paired up with the 16 vs the 9. Although catching a hot team could happen from 1-8. Could not care less about the #1 curse. It has to end some time and we've never been #1. With Hoover being a max of 3 games im less worried about fatigue as well. Lets win out


With how volatile and imperfect the college baseball ranking/seeding process is, there is little guarantee that the 9 is significantly better than the 16.

All I want is a top 8 and not be paired with an SEC team
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
25087 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Yeah idiot...I was watching Mcdonald pitch back in the day. I dgaf if we are #1 or not as long as top 8....was just saying we haven't been in position to be 1 in a while this year and finishing like we appear to be might put us there. Of course, some younger edgy punk gonna act like an idiot. Guarantee seen more and been to more LSU baseball games than you, probably at least twice as many. I've seen you post on here...you one of the little emotional bitches when losing.


This you, baw?

Posted by stuckintexas
Austin & DFW
Member since Sep 2009
3029 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 1:35 pm to
I just want LSU and Texas on opposite sides of the bracket. Only chance to meet up would be both teams making it all the way to the finals where the Tigers can get some revenge for that series in Austin.
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
14898 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 1:58 pm to
There’s an obvious benefit to 1 versus 8.

Potentially UC Irvine in a super regional instead of Jamie Arnold and Florida State.
Posted by PigDog33
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2021
995 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

if we get to 19 wins, can we skip Hoover? Or treat it like a midweek.


Or try to win it?
Posted by Brotorious
NOLA
Member since May 2013
552 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 2:06 pm to
I appreciate the recognition a #1 is. Amd I don’t know the numbers but it seems rare that the #1 wins it all. 2-4 would be nice. I do think if they finish like you say…depending on Texas..there is a shot at #1.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 2:10 pm to
I wasn't saying I wanted it, but I'm not against it either. I don't believe in that jinx shite. I was just saying they sweep today and win the series next week they will fi ish #2 in the sec to a struggling Texas. That's definitely grounds for a top 3 seed if not 1.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
23994 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 2:13 pm to
Only #1 I care about happens on June 24th
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
9016 posts
Posted on 5/11/25 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Potentially UC Irvine in a super regional instead of Jamie Arnold and Florida State.



Ojeda is very good for Irvine as well
This post was edited on 5/11/25 at 2:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram