Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us LSU WBB now projected to be 2 seed (#7 overall) paired with number one overall seed UConn | Page 2 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: LSU WBB now projected to be 2 seed (#7 overall) paired with number one overall seed UConn

Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:31 pm to
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12599 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:31 pm to
Top seed should be paired with #8 overall as their second seed and #2 overall gets # 7 overall as their second seed.
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
22393 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:31 pm to
They try to avoid placing conference teams as the top 2 seeds if at all possible.
Posted by mule74
Watersound Beach
Member since Nov 2004
12687 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:39 pm to
Honestly, I’d rather be in a bracket with anyone but USCe. I think we have a better chance of pulling of an upset over anyone else from just a psychological perspective.
Posted by LSUGrad9295
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
37370 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Us and Vanderbilt can only be placed in UConn or UCLA’s bracket.

That's not right


It actually kinda is. The committee in their reveals has shown that they dont want to put teams from the same league as #1 and #2 in the same region. That is why the regional assignments dont match up with the S-curve. (1v8, 2v7 etc.)

They did some moving around to make sure #4 Texas and #5 Vandy are not in the same region.

What I dont get is this...they could have still paired #1 Uconn with #8 Michigan and #2 UCLA with #7 LSU...but they didnt.
Posted by Allthatfades
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2014
9011 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:48 pm to
There’s no hard rule but they aren’t putting two teams from the same conference 1 and 2 in the same region. If Texas and South Carolina are 1’s and LSU is a 2, it will either be with UConn or UCLA
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
70866 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

What I dont get is this...they could have still paired #1 Uconn with #8 Michigan and #2 UCLA with #7 LSU...but they didnt.


They paired Vandy with ucla is why

The funniest part in all this is SC has the easiest region with these adjustments
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted by Septiger
Member since Nov 2020
3182 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:51 pm to
No big deal but Iowa ahead of LSU is a joke .
Posted by LSUGrad9295
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
37370 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

They paired Vandy with ucla is why


Yeah. Makes sense. They didnt want to put UConn with the best 2 seed (Vandy)
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
79663 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

It actually kinda is. The committee in their reveals has shown that they dont want to put teams from the same league as #1 and #2 in the same region. That is why the regional assignments dont match up with the S-curve. (1v8, 2v7 etc.)

They did some moving around to make sure #4 Texas and #5 Vandy are not in the same region.

What I dont get is this...they could have still paired #1 Uconn with #8 Michigan and #2 UCLA with #7 LSU...but they didnt.

To not have LSU/UCLA for the 3rd straight year
Posted by BrianKellysbuyout
Member since Nov 2025
1103 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Us and Vanderbilt can only be placed in UConn or UCLA’s bracket. And I guess they don’t want to put the top 1 seed and top 2 seed together. So we get stuck there by default.


Exactly. They're only going to give the SEC 2 #1 seeds no matter what, and they're not gonna pair Vandy and LSU with Texas or SC. Either way you slice it, no matter if it's 1,2, or 3 seed, LSU is still going to be paired with the same group of teams.
Posted by lsualum96
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Nov 2005
3446 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 1:21 pm to
So, are you all saying that the reason that LSU is paired with UConn is that after the #8 seed, the next "easiest" matchup in that bracket for UConn would be LSU? So, UConn as the #1 overall should have the easiest path to the final four, under the circumstances?
Posted by semjase
New Smyrna Beach FL
Member since May 2014
15299 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

But we always get dinged for having a coach with conservative values.
That can't beat the "Female Basketball Ryan Clark" at South Carolina.

Racist Dawn always kicks her butt!
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
70866 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

So, are you all saying that the reason that LSU is paired with UConn is that after the #8 seed, the next "easiest" matchup in that bracket for UConn would be LSU? So, UConn as the #1 overall should have the easiest path to the final four, under the circumstances?


Basically. They trying to avoid giving SEC a scenario where the 1-2 seed meet in the elite 8

So they are giving UConn the lowest ranked 2 seed from the SEC (LSU), while UCLA gets Vanderbilt. While Texas and SC the other two 1 seeds would be potentially slated to meet two non SEC teams in the elite 8

Of all the 2 seeds, UConn actually will end up with one of the tougher seeds in the elite 8. Which is technically not fair either but that’s how they have historically done this
Posted by secfballfan
Member since Feb 2016
3511 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 2:39 pm to
UCONN’s dominance is real but is based on their ability to wear teams down in the second half. We have as much depth as them, not doubt they would be favored to beat us (8 or so) BUT would rather play them than UCLA- their bigs would be very tough for our young bigs. IMHO we are one of 2-3 teams who could beat UCON.
Posted by semjase
New Smyrna Beach FL
Member since May 2014
15299 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 2:56 pm to
Nobody is beating the "Women's Basketball Indiana Football Doppelganger" program.

Just go ahead a give them the trophy!
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17448 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Us and Vanderbilt can only be placed in UConn or UCLA’s bracket.

That's not right

Top 4 SEC teams can't be placed in the same region. So if Texas and USC are 1 seeds, LSU and Vandy are left with UConn and UCLA.
Posted by king47
Member since Aug 2020
2000 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 10:13 am to
Didn’t say it mattered just giving the facts
Posted by Supermoto Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2010
10587 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 12:17 pm to
I have no problem with LSU-U CONN matchup. I'm looking forward to it and have been waiting for this since Kim got here.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
33148 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 12:20 pm to
I feel like we’d have a really nice crowd in Ft Worth, and I don’t get the impression this is the same dominant UConn team of the past.


I’d much rather UCONN than UCLA again.
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
31397 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 2:18 pm to
You pick your poison if we make it to the Elite Eight. Who would prefer in a regional final: Texas, SC or UCLA? I'm not convinced that UConn is more "unbeatable" that the other teams.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram