- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA removed U Turn signs because they were “offensive”…
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:19 am to Placekicker
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:19 am to Placekicker
In fairness I get offended when I have to go another half mile to turn around instead of using a perfectly good turnaround point.
0
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:22 am to Placekicker
Ideological insanity is gripping the left to the point of stupidity.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:25 am to nola tiger lsu
quote:
This was news years ago, cmon people. It had to do with anti joyriding laws and gay men searching for other gay men by circling around the same stretch of road. 10 seconds of research would get you context, but no come to the irrational board to air your irrational anger instead. This is a nonstory.
So the traffic signs are offensive because they interfere with gays trying to pick up street whores?
This context makes their bitching even more ridiculous.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:26 am to Placekicker
I understand the alleged history argument, but it seems pretty weak…
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:29 am to Placekicker
Welcome to 2024 when this story first came out.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:02 am to Placekicker
I’d like to take this opportunity to complain about the traffic rules concerning U-turns. As it is, a driver making a right turn on red is supposed to yield to U-turners on their right. It should be the other way around because a right-turner on red driver has to be looking in the complete opposite direction than the u-turner watching for oncoming traffic. The u-turner has everything in front of them AND they are make an unusual move. The rule as it stands now is dangerous.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:11 am to Undertow
quote:
I’d like to take this opportunity to complain about the traffic rules concerning U-turns
Agreed. Here in Pensacola, those rules don’t apply. It’s normal for a person to perform a U turn, someone else to turn right, and a third someone else to turn left into the same lane at the same time.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:51 am to Doctor Strangelove
quote:
don’t get how that’s offensive. What am I missing?
Nothing.
These people don't need a logical or rational reason to be offended. They don't even really need any reason at all.
They're just offended. Perpetually.
I personally cannot fathom such a miserable way of existence. Life is too short, and they're just out looking for reasons to make it miserable.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 12:18 pm to Placekicker
frick this gay world
Posted on 1/18/26 at 12:27 pm to Doctor Strangelove
quote:
I don’t get how that’s offensive. What am I missing?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 12:38 pm to Pepperoni
Of course they were. Rolls eyes. They couldn’t possibly have been put there to prevent traffic accidents.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 12:39 pm to Placekicker
No way this is real. Is it real? I honestly can't tell anymore.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 12:54 pm to Placekicker
These frickin people really have a frickin
Problem
Problem
Posted on 1/18/26 at 1:04 pm to Doctor Strangelove
quote:
What am I missing?
Now Cut #1001 of what originally "death by a thousand cuts."
Posted on 1/18/26 at 1:11 pm to Undertow
quote:
I’d like to take this opportunity to complain about the traffic rules concerning U-turns. As it is, a driver making a right turn on red is supposed to yield to U-turners on their right. It should be the other way around because a right-turner on red driver has to be looking in the complete opposite direction than the u-turner watching for oncoming traffic. The u-turner has everything in front of them AND they are make an unusual move. The rule as it stands now is dangerous.
What’s the rule if I’m making a right turn, and a driver to my right is making a left turn across my lane and I T-bone him? Seems like it should be his fault since I’m oncoming traffic. I’ve seen some rather weird 5-way intersections where this is remedied by “No Turn On Red”.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 1:14 pm to Placekicker
One more thing. Aren’t “one-way” streets bi-phobic? Seems like it would be more inclusive for streets to go both ways.
ETA: similar question for “Exit Only”.
ETA: similar question for “Exit Only”.
This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 1/18/26 at 1:40 pm to Placekicker
Fragile fagsculinity
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:03 pm to nola tiger lsu
quote:
It had to do with anti joyriding laws and gay men searching for other gay men by circling around the same stretch of road.
So sounds to me irregardless of the reason why they kept circling the same stretch of road, the actual act of constantly circling the road was causing traffic hazards, hence the need for the signs.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:15 pm to Placekicker
The same state that gave illiterate foreigners CDL licenses. It doesn't surprise me.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:18 pm to Placekicker
That's so gay.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News