Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Mexican Navy blames NY harbor pilot for crash. | Page 2 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Mexican Navy blames NY harbor pilot for crash.

Posted on 5/24/25 at 10:15 am to
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
19274 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 10:15 am to
Did they ever figure out if the Mexicans sent an Airforce Captain to Captain their only vessel?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62855 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Mexican Navy is literally an oxymoron.


I don’t think you know what an oxymoron is.
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
9142 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 10:16 am to
quote:

the ship may have been stuck in reverse at the time of the crash, but that the pilot was commanding the ship’s captain to keep moving full speed ahead.

Language barrier?
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
13812 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 10:51 am to
Mex should blame the water, too. And currents, wind And gravity.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Mexican Navy blames NY harbor pilot for crash.


That makes me chuckle.
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
1870 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 11:07 am to
quote:

A pilot has the legal responsibility to guide the crew properly in handling the vessel, but the Captain has ultimate responsibility for the vessel in entirety.


What responsibility is more "ultimate" than legal responsibility?

Captain can get fired but the pilot is the one sued into oblivion?
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
8403 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 11:13 am to
We have multiple people saying it’s the captain and others saying it’s the pilot who is in command.

The question is:

If the captain says forward and the pilot says reverse, who had the power at that moment? Does the captain relent or the pilot?
This post was edited on 5/24/25 at 11:14 am
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
19726 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 11:22 am to
quote:

“The pilot on the ship doesn’t know what caused the ship to be rapidly accelerating in a backward direction

It’s nacho fault when the riber pilot says you have to go back.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23323 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 11:43 am to
quote:

It's all recorded on ships now I dont know about a sailboat


Didn't you just read about all ahead, forward and the ship was instead stuck in reverse (throttle)? It was not purely a sail boat. The sails weren't hoisted.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73780 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 12:26 pm to
Why didn't they use a tug like usual with tall ships?
Posted by achenator
Member since Oct 2014
3287 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Why didn't they use a tug like usual with tall ships?


Tugs are there to work the ship on to and away from the dock. Most of the work is still done by the ship's engine and propellor. They had a tug there maybe just to nudge it off the dock, it's expected that the ship would pull away after that. Also, a modern 4000+ HP tug could easily damage a ship like that while maneuvering it.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
73817 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Who is in command when a pilot comes on board? The captain or the pilot?
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
1870 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

If the captain says forward and the pilot says reverse, who had the power at that moment? Does the captain relent or the pilot?


Unless the law says the person not at the controls must physically remove the person at the controls if it appears they are being negligent...a language I highly doubt exists...then ultimate responsibility should fall on whoever is pushing the buttons.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
74454 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

THe pilot does have complete command of the ship


I am not a maritime expert, but I know some. They disagree with this statement.
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
3694 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

A pilot has the legal responsibility to guide the crew properly in handling the vessel, but the Captain has ultimate responsibility for the vessel in entirety.

What responsibility is more "ultimate" than legal responsibility?

Captain can get fired but the pilot is the one sued into oblivion?


First of all, understand that a legally appointed Captain or Master IS the law on board a vessel underway. Read that again. No other legal authority at any level may override the Captain while he or she is in command of the vessel. This most assuredly includes pilots.

That out of the way, legally the pilot can be held liable only for purposely misrepresenting any facts that effect the safety of the personnel onboard or seaworthiness of the vessel. But outside of such misrepresentations, the pilot cannot be held responsible for any problems. That's the Captain's responsibility. As the Captain IS the law, everything is his responsibility because he is under the command of no boss, law officer, court or any other authority. Good, bad or indifferent, the buck stops with him. Always.

Imagine driving down the street with your mother-in-law in the back seat. If she gives you incorrect advice on how to drive the car and there's an accident, you are at fault. With a pilot on a vessel, it's the same thing except your piloting mother-in-law knows the streets very well and you have never been in that town. You may have a justifiable case of the red arse but you're still at fault.

Back to the accident discussed, here's the best explanation of what probably happened.
Posted by td1
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
3157 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

If the captain says forward and the pilot says reverse, who had the power at that moment? Does the captain relent or the pilot?


The captain has ultimate authority over the vessel at all times, pilot on board or not.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
70621 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

It's all recorded on ships now I dont know about a sailboat



It wasnt a sailboat. And if they were not flying this, the Coast Guard should give them a fine


Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
70621 posts
Posted on 5/24/25 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

The captain has ultimate authority over the vessel at all times, pilot on board or not.




Ding ding ding
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
19274 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

I don’t think you know what an oxymoron is.


Prove it
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
38660 posts
Posted on 5/26/25 at 8:49 am to
It may be in some places, but I sure as hell want a local pilot in the Mississippi.


It's a busy place with done tricky currents.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram