Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us So does any leftist on this board honestly believe Ukraine can win the war? | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: So does any leftist on this board honestly believe Ukraine can win the war?

Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:46 am to
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
54047 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:46 am to
quote:

If the answer is no, then why are they so adamant the fighting continues?

Because the war was never about winning. It was always about bleeding Russia so badly that the NWO advancement could continue its eastward march. There was a secondary motive of making money in the usual MIC way, too. But no one ever thought they were going to beat Russia.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28155 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:52 am to
quote:

So does any leftist on this board honestly believe Ukraine can win the war?

How could anyone believe the American colonies could defeat the British Army?

Well, my money and support is always on anyone who is fighting for their existence against foreign rule.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
4806 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Because the war was never about winning. It was always about bleeding Russia


I'm willing to entertain the idea that NATO wants to weaken Russia, but to what end? Are we afraid that Russia is going to firmly align with China, so Russia must be neutered? Does Putin trust China more than he does the West? If this is all about realignments, I'd be looking for ways to improve relations between Russia and the West, not make them worse.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134349 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Russia wants peace talks.
I wish that were true.

Actually, Putin wants Ukraine surrender talks. Big difference.

Don't take my word for it. Kremlin spokesman Peskov said just a few weeks ago that Russia would keep fighting until all of its original objectives were achieved.

It doesn't get any clearer than that...
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:55 am to
Only with American troops on the ground.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
58626 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

What does a "win" look like for Ukraine? They are never getting Crimea back.
There's a less than 5% chance they will ever get the Donbas region back. It's really about where the new lines are drawn.

If a "win" to to you means regaining all their land from 2014 or even 2022, the answer is no.

The best they can hope for now is to limit the amount of land lost.


That's essentially the point I made in a thread the other day.

If "winning" for Ukraine is defined by pushing Russia back behind the pre-war lines then the only way that happens is through direct involvement of US troops. Period. Trump has shown he isn't interested in starting wars, so that possibility is extremely remote.

In other words, the reality of Ukraine's "winning" is that they lose land. How much they lose depends on how long they want to wait before going to the table to sign a peace deal as Russia has the ability to eventually wear them completely down. They and their supporters will need to understand that any deal will likely have two mandatory parts Russia will not negotiate on:

1. Ukraine does not enter NATO
2. Russia keeps much (or all) of the lands they have taken
Posted by Lord of the Hogs
Member since Sep 2023
3570 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 8:58 am to
Because Zelensky wants to try to beg for more money and weapons. That’s the only reason he’s been sitting down with Trump at all.

Putin is wanting peace talks but not while a guy like Zelensky is on the other side. Putin knows Zelensky is faking any kind of peace negotiations.
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4231 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:00 am to
quote:

How does Ukraine want to keep on fighting? Are they the aggressor in this or something?

Zelensky sounded like the agressor last Friday.
Posted by Mushroom1968
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2023
5754 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Well, my money and support is always on anyone who is fighting for their existence against foreign rule.



Most people don’t have a problem with Ukraine defending themselves. We’ve sent enough money, it’s time for that money to stay in our country. Same for Israel
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
4806 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Kremlin spokesman Peskov said just a few weeks ago that Russia would keep fighting until all of its original objectives were achieved.

It doesn't get any clearer than that...


Clarity would mean knowing with certainty their original objectives. Would Russia consider a land corridor to Crimea and an agreement that there will be no NATO membership/security force for Ukraine sufficient?
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 9:07 am
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
7850 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:11 am to
Were you to acknowledge the US contributions/provocations that led to the current crisis, you may be taken seriously. You can't ignore the failure to account for hundreds of billions of dollars in US "aid", and the calls for more $$$, when it's abundantly clear Ukraine has zero chance for victory.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
14328 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:12 am to
Not a leftist.
I’m right of center on religion, social issues, fictional institutional racism, DEI=DIE, ABCXYZ+-= is immoral, their are only two genders and sexes and anything in between is either a physical and/or mental abnormality.

I’m also anti BRICS, N Korea, and Iran.

Can the Ukrainians win this war? Yes.
Will the Ukrainians win this war? Probably not.

Can the Russians win this war? No!

Even if Russia occupies 100% of Ukraine they’ve already lost.
1-Strategically
A) Russia saw NATO expand into the critical Baltic Sea and Arctic with the addition of Sweden and Finland.
B) Moldova’s pro-EU President Maia Sandu has claimed a second term after a tense election run-off seen as a choice between Europe and Russia, with 55% of the vote.
C) China is starting to realize that expansion into Asiatic Russia might be a possibility.
D) The Baltics and Poland are physically isolating Kaliningrad.
2-Economically
A) Close to a million young Russians fled to avoid the draft. Russian demographics cannot afford the loss of one youngster. Another half to three quarters of a million young men have been physically wounded or killed. And who knows the mental toll on this critical demographic?
B) Western capital, technology, and talent have fled. Western industry and workers will think extremely hard about reentering Russia.
C) Russia’s most profitable energy sales were natural gas sold to the West through pipelines. Most of these pipelines are destroyed or easily destroyed by Ukraine.
D) No one trades in the ruble. It is dead. Russia has wasted Western currency trying to prop it up during the war. They have no capital to continue the war past 2025. Worse they have no capital to rebuild their economy from war to peace except predatory China.
E) After fossil fuels, their next most profitable export was military equipment. This war demonstrates just how behind their crap is from Western equipment is.
F) Russia now lacks the technical know how to maintain there frozen eastern oil field that supply China and India.
3- Morale
A) Conscription and casualties have fallen on their Asian population in the East. This worsens the relationship with their Slavic overlords.
B) Conscription and casualties are now becoming more West after the N Korean failure. This is creating anti war feelings that are being temporary suppressed by forced government silence through fear. It’s possible the government can suppress this indefinitely, but if it fails the pressure will cause an explosion.
C) State corruption has been exposed in its depth and breadth! No one knew how extremely widespread and all encompassing it actually is. This has 2 devastating impacts upon the Russians. First, the West and China now realizes the myth of Russian competence and power. This raises the real question of the state of maintenance and actual deployability of their nuclear forces. Second, the Russian people are now aware of the same mythology and implications.
4- Future potential
Putin’s Russia has no good path forward in the near future. They have made their demographic problems worse. They have pissed away decades of savings from fossil fuels in three short years. They have revealed their military impotence to the world including China. They only have predatory Chinese capital for rebuilding. Their people now know their weakness, government suppression, and corruption.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
10863 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:18 am to
quote:

How does Ukraine want to keep on fighting?


Because the people with the power to end the war are not the ones fighting the war. Considering how many fighting age men fled the country, I don't think the average Ukrainian ever wanted to figh.


quote:

Are they the aggressor in this or something?


They are the pawns of globalist scum who have antagonized Russia for 2 decades. Ukrainians are suffering and dying so people like you can "stick it to the Russians" from the comfort of your home.

This war could have ended 2 years ago, but people like Biden and Boris Johnson needed more wealth, and people like you, unaffected by the war, needed more death to satiate your bloodlust.
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
5345 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:41 am to
quote:

They will go 100mph in the opposite direction of anything Trump says. He could say "remember to wear a lifejacket" and fifty leftists would drown by sunrise.





I really think he ought to start doing PSA safety messages on TV and the internet, for agencies like NHTSA and such. "Buckle Up" "get some exercise" "eat healthy"

And just watch the reactions come in. You know the View ladies, Jasmine Crocket, Pelosi, Stephanoplos, etc.. are all going to explode... "who does he think he is telling us to buckle up, I dont have to if I dont want to!!!!"
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
54360 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:43 am to
quote:

I don’t think Ukraine does.


My guess is that IF the Ukrainian people were allowed to vote honestly on it with no interference, they would vote for a Peace agreement now.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47117 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:45 am to
They keep moving the goal posts. Our resident loon TexRidder now supports European troops on the ground in Ukraine. Is there any doubt he will eventually call for your sons and daughters to go there to die for nothing?
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
16934 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

The best they can hope for now is to limit the amount of land lost.


The best they can hope for is to settle where the lines are now. If they wait longer Russia will take more land.

Ukraine is a lost cause. Especially with the US not sending more money or weapons. But Z doesnt want that to happen because if its over then martial law is ended and he is overwhelmingly voted out of office.

All that can be done is end the war and stop the bleeding.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17136 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:51 am to
quote:

How could anyone believe the American colonies could defeat the British Army?


Uhh.. if the UK wasn’t an ocean away and their citizens disconnected from the colonies.. the colonials more than likely wouldn’t have.

If the UK was as close to the US as, say, Cuba, the Revolution may have been a disaster. The US still didnt have a big answer for the UK in 1812.
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
17532 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Putin is wanting peace talks but not while a guy like Zelensky is on the other side. Putin knows Zelensky is faking any kind of peace negotiations.


Couldn’t the Ukrainians and Zelensky think the same thing about Putin and Russia though? How can you be so certain that Putin isn’t faking the peace negotiations? I mean, he’s yet to sit down with any politician for negotiations, from the US or West. If he’s so serious about peace and really wants to stop all the dying, then why doesn’t he seem to be in any hurry to come meet with everyone? Deals can only be made by sitting down with one another and making assurances. Everyone has done those things except for Putin, who also directed his military to invade another country, but he wants peace not war, am I right?
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
54360 posts
Posted on 3/5/25 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Unless the West is willing to mobilize, train, and equip a huge military force to send to Ukraine, then it’s pointless for Ukraine to continue fighting


I get the impression that many of our fellow Americans and many leaders of the EU want this to happen - American war-fighting ground combat units deployed to the Eastern Front to fight the Russian Army. That's just my impression.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram