Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us FDA Chief wants all meds to be over the counter unless addictive | Page 4 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: FDA Chief wants all meds to be over the counter unless addictive

Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:05 am to
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11660 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:05 am to
I think this is part of the point. Why legislate to contain costs of insurance, expand access to providers trained in exercising medical judgement and how to safely administer medications when we can just let people assume the risks and the costs themselves. We have a saying in our field that the doctor who treats himself has a fool for a patient - and that's meant to caution people who have medical training about the risks of self-treatment.
Posted by Dee_oh_Dee
Member since Aug 2024
133 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Okay, I’m assuming you disagree with “weeks.” How long do you think it will take? Bc it will happen eventually if anyone can just buy their own abx for a run of the mill viral URI.



What percentage of the world already has access over the counter?

2/3, 3/4, more?



That's a pretty weak argument that the west needs a script to prevent a super bug.


Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5196 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:

That's a fact. A simple search would show posters that in ASIA, Africa, Europe...etc Many nations sell them OTC.


Can you cite where you see that in Europe, antibiotics are allowed OTC?

I am seeing that the EU requires a prescription for all antibiotics, other than some topical creams. Might go under the radar in some european countries but where is it actually legal in the EU from your research?
This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 11:13 am
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
867 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:

There will be superbugs in like a week.
It is a go-to for WAY too many physicians. It is mind-boggling.
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
867 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Make sudafed available on the shelf again.
I have to hire Smurfs during allergy season.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11660 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:14 am to
It depends on what you mean by a superbug - presumably has resistance to all known antibiotics. Thankfully we don't have those, but we have plenty with multi-drug antibiotic resistance. They mean harder to treat infections, longer to get better, more expensive, often only available by IV (so you have to be in hospital where you're at risk of nosocomial infections), more side effects of the big gun antibiotics. We'd be speeding up the clock on antibiotic resistance and it's under-invested in because these meds aren't big money-makers, but that would probably change in a world of OTC antibiotics.
This post was edited on 2/18/26 at 11:15 am
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
5877 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:16 am to
quote:

quote:
unless a drug is unsafe

How will this be determined?


I don't think any of them are "safe" but some have blackbox warnings included. People should be made aware of all the "side effects" of pharmaceuticals.

https://www.drugs.com/
Posted by RFK
Mar-a-Lago
Member since May 2012
2975 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:17 am to
I disagree with this, it will put most pharmacists out of business
Posted by BCvol
Member since Jan 2022
365 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:18 am to
Forgot to bring a med I take daily on a recent vacation to Mexico. It was easier to get there than it would have been in another state for a tenth of the cost.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39538 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:18 am to
This is an exceedingly poor policy.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11660 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:19 am to
Seems like two different instincts here. One is the precautionary “more casual access could push resistance” & the other is “if that’s true we should see it where access is looser”.

The tricky part is that resistance doesn’t show up as “people I know got into trouble”, it shows up in surveillance data over years. Some countries that had easy access actually tightened rules after seeing rising resistance, but it’s also not the only factor - prescribing culture and stewardship matter a lot.

Probably the useful question is what do the actual trends look like in places with OTC access?
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
92723 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

unless a drug is unsafe

How will this be determined?
i'm almost positive if i gobble down a whole bottle of ibuprofen i'll die
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11660 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:33 am to
I’m not sure it’s even a policy yet ( it reads more like a slogan).

“Everything OTC unless unsafe/addictive/needs monitoring” only becomes meaningful once you define monitoring (labs? interaction checks? pregnancy risk? BP follow-up?) and specify the decision pathway for Rx --> OTC switches.

The interesting question isn’t whether the idea is good or bad - it’s what criteria and guardrails you’d actually use. Antibiotics, pseudoephedrine, narrow therapeutic index drugs, pharmacist-gated meds… they all land differently once you get specific.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39538 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Probably the useful question is what do the actual trends look like in places with OTC access?



It does not look great in Colombia, where I know many antibiotics (among other drugs) are sold over the counter. The resistance rate for the first-line medications for E. coli, fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX, appear to have resistance rates above 30% in all the tested specimens. Aminopenicillins, like amoxicillin and ampicillin, have resistance rates above 60%.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31904 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Almost anything can be addictive.

quote:

You should work on your addiction to posting here.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127463 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Almost anything can be addictive.


No.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39538 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:42 am to
quote:

The interesting question isn’t whether the idea is good or bad - it’s what criteria and guardrails you’d actually use. Antibiotics, pseudoephedrine, narrow therapeutic index drugs, pharmacist-gated meds… they all land differently once you get specific.



I'm not sure the policy makers care about the specifics all that much. You can make the argument that even medications like NSAIDs should be more closely monitored given their sundry effects on the body.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127463 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:44 am to
I think a lot of drugs that could’ve been moved OTC have already been moved OTC.

We don’t need people being able to purchase their own Zpack.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137220 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:48 am to
quote:

it’s about keeping the monopoly intact.
Again, you seem to presuppose the AMA gives a rats arse about "the monopoly." The only thing the AMA cares about is royalty revenue from licensing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes.
Posted by captainFid
Never apologize to barbarism
Member since Dec 2014
9910 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 11:50 am to
quote:

FDA Chief wants all meds to be over the counter unless addictive
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram